Chichilnisky, Graciela (1994): Traditional comparative advantage vs. increasing returns to scale: NAFTA and the GATT. Published in: International Problems of Economic Interdependence (1994): pp. 161-197.
Download (10MB) | Preview
Regional free trade zones have been unexpectedly successful in the last decade. Since 1980 the European Community enlarged significantly its membership and its scope. It now includes southern European countries, and market-integrating features allowing goods, people, services and capital to flow freely around an area accounting for about one fourth of world economic output. Based on economies of scale - we find a condition that determine whether trading blocks Such as NAFTA and the EU are complementary with and encourage global free trade - when this condition fails, instead, trading blocks undermine free trade.
It is the purpose of this paper to re-examine the positive and negative aspects of trading blocs as they relate to gains from free trade. The paper is primarily a discussion of conceptual issues, although it is based on facts and on particular cases which are of interest to the trade liberalization in the Americas.
We take a somewhat different approach to a familiar issue. Rather than asking the standard question of whether regional blocs help or hinder global free trade, we ask a more detailed question: what type of customs union is likely to lead to a trade war between the blocs, and what type of customs union is, instead, likely to lead to expanded global trade. In practical terms: what type of trade policies within the blocs will provide economic incentives for expanding free trade.
We shall compare the impact on the world economy of free trade blocs which are organized around two alternative principles: one is traditional comparative advantages, the other is economies of scale. The aim is to determine how the patterns of trade inside the blocs determine the trade relations among the blocs.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Traditional comparative advantage vs. increasing returns to scale: NAFTA and the GATT|
|Keywords:||trading blocs; free trade; trade wars; international trade; international policy; comparative advantage; economies of scale; patterns of trade; GATT; NAFTA; EC; trade diversion; resources; emissions; protectionism; returns to scale; interdependence; global environment|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F18 - Trade and Environment
F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F12 - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies ; Fragmentation
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O19 - International Linkages to Development ; Role of International Organizations
|Depositing User:||Graciela Chichilnisky|
|Date Deposited:||21. Apr 2008 14:19|
|Last Modified:||18. Feb 2013 01:27|
AMELUNG T.: "Tropical Deforestation as an International Economic Problem", Linz (Austria), Egon Sohmen Foundation, Paper presented at the Conference on Economic Evolution and Environmental Concerns, August 30-31, 1991.
BARBIER E.B. - BURGER J.C. - MARKANDYA A.: «The Economics of Tropical Deforestation, Ambio», vol. 20, n. 2, 1991, pp. 55-8.
BINKLEY C.S. - VINCENT J.R.: "Forest Based Industrialization: a Dynamic Perspective", Washington (D.C.), World Bank, Forest Policy Issues Paper, 1990.
CHICHILNISKY G.: "Terms of Trade and Domestic Distribution: Export Led Growth with Abundant Labor", Journal of Development Economics, n. 8, 1981, pp. 163-92.
CHICHILNISKY G. - HEAL G.: The Evolving International Economy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987.
CHICHILNISKY G.: "A General Equilibrium Theory of North-South Trade", Part 1: Equilibrium Analysis, Essays in Honor of Kenneth Arrow, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1986, pp. 3-56.
CHICHILNISKY G.: "Global Environment and North-South Trade" Stanford, Stanford Institute for Theoretical Economics, Stanford University, Technical Report, n. 31, 1991.
CHICHILNISKY G.: "North-South Trade and the Dynamics of Renewable Resources", Columbia University, Working Paper, 1992.
CHICHILNISKY G.: "Customs Unions with Economies of Scale", Columbia University, Working Paper, 1992.
DADZIE K.: "Accelerating the Development Process: Challenges for National and International Policies in the 1990's", Report by the Secretary General of UNCTAD to UNCTAD VIII, New York, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 1991.
HYDE W.F. - NEUMANN D.H.: "Forest Economics in Brief-with Summary Observations for Policy Analysis", Washington (DC), World Bank, First Report on Agricultural and Rural Development, 1991.
KENNAN J. - RIEZMAN R.: "Do Big Countries Win Tariff Wars", Economic Review, vol. 29, n. 1, 1988, pp. 81-5.
KENNAN J. - RIEZMAN R.: "Optimal Tariff Equilibria with Customs Union", Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. XXIII, n. 1, 1990, pp. 70-83.
KRUGMAN P.: "The Move to Free Trade Zones", Department of Economics, MIT, Working Paper, 1991.
KRUGMAN P. - OBSTFELT M.: International Economics, Illinois, Boston, London, Scott, Foresman and Companv, 1988.
LERNER A.: "The Symmetry Between Import and Export Taxes", Economica, n. 3, 1936, pp. 306-13.
MEADE J.: The Theory of Customs Unions, Amsterdam, North-Holland, 1955.
MEADE J.: The Theory of Indicative Planning, London, Allen Unwin, 1971.
METZLER L.: "Tariffs the Terms of Trade and Distribution of National Income", Journal of Political Economy, n. 57, 1949, pp. 1-29.
NICHOLSON W.: Microeconomic Theory, Hinsdale (Ill.), The Dryden Press, 1978.
RIEZMAN R.: "Customs Unions and the Core", Journal of International Economics, n. 19, 1985, pp. 355-65.
VINER J.: The Customs Union Issue, New York, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.