Neighbors and Friends: How Do Right-wing Parties Compensate for Globalization?

Ftergioti, Stamatia (2017): Neighbors and Friends: How Do Right-wing Parties Compensate for Globalization?

Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between globalization and party positions accounting for potential differences between left- and right-wing parties. According to our theoretical priors we expect that parties respond to globalization in a different way depending on their ideology and social groups of representation. The empirical analysis is based on a panel model of 34 political parties in 17 Western European countries between 1970 and 2010. We find that right-wing parties move leftward in response to globalization while left-wing parties do not alter their position, or move rightward. Additionally, we find that parties ideological positions are affected by foreign parties’ positions of the same ideological bloc giving support to party policy diffusion argument. The main findings appear remarkably robust to additional econometric techniques such as instrumental variables, Jackknife and methods that account for cross-sectional dependence. The findings in total give support for the existence of party system convergence towards left due to the right-wing party moderation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: party’s position; globalization; partisan politics; panel data
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies

References

Adam, A., & Kammas, P. (2007). Tax policies in a globalized world: Is it politics after all? Public Choice, 133, 321–341.

Adams, J., Clark, M., Ezrow, L., & Glasgow, G. (2004). Understanding change and stability in party ideologies: Do parties respond to public opinion or to past election results? British Journal of Political Science, 34(4), 589–610.

Adams, J., Clark, M., Ezrow, L., & Glasgow, G. (2006). Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and the electoral consequences of European parties’ policy shifts, 1978-1998. American Journal of Political Science, 41(1), 149–174.

Adams, J., Haupt, A., & Stoll, H. (2009). What moves parties? The role of public opinion and global economic conditions in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 42(5), 611–39.

Adams, J., & Somer-Topcu, Z. (2009). Do parties adjust their policies in response to rival parties’ policy shifts? Spatial theory and the dynamics of party competition in twenty-five democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 825–846.

Alesina, A., & Rosenthal, H.(1989). Partisan cycles in congressional elections and the macroeconomy. American Political Science Review, 83(2), 373–398.

Armingeon, K., Isler, C., Knopfel L., Weisstanner D., & Engler, S. (2015). Comparative political data set 1960-2013. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.

Beck, N., & Katz, J. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time–series cross–section data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634–647.

Beck, N., & Katz, J. (2011). Modeling Dynamics in Time-Series-Cross-Section Political Economy Data. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 331–352.

Bergh, A., & Nilsson, T. (2010). Do liberalization and globalization increase income inequality? European Journal of Political Economy, 26, 488–505.

Böhmelt, T., Ezrow, L., Lehrer, R., & Ward, H. (2016). Party Policy Diffusion. American Political Science Review, 110(2). 397–410.

Boix, C. (1998). Political parties, growth and equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Budge, I., Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., & Tanenbaum, E. (2001). Mapping policy preferences: estimates for parties, electors, and governments 1945-1998. New York: Oxford University Press.

Burgoon, B. (2012). Partisan embedding of liberalism: How trade, investment, and immigration affect party support for the welfare state. Comparative Political Studies, 45, 606–635.

Cameron, D. (1978). The expansion of the public economy: A comparative analysis. The American Political Science Review, 72(4), 1243–1261.

DeHoyos, R. E., & Sarafidis, V. (2006). Testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel data models. The Stata Journal, 6(4), 482–496.

Döring, H., & Manow, P. (2016). Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov): Information on parties, elections and cabinets in modern democracies. Available online: http://parlgov.org/

Dorussen, H. & Nanou, K. (2013). European integration and electoral democracy: How the European Union constrains party competition in the Member State. European Journal of Political Research, 52, 71–93.

Dreher, A. (2006a). Does globalization affect growth? Empirical evidence from a new index. Applied Economics, 38, 1091–1110.

Dreher, A. (2006b). The influence of globalization on taxes and social policy: an empirical analysis for OECD countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 22,179–201.

Dreher, A., & Gaston, N. (2007). Has globalization really had no effect on unions? Kyklos, 60(2), 165–186.

Dreher, A., Gaston, N. & Martens, P. (2008a). Measuring globalization–gauging its consequences. New York: Spinger.

Dreher, A., Sturm, J., & Ursprung, H.W. (2008b). The impact of globalization on the composition of government expenditures: evidence from panel data. Public Choice, 134, 263–292.

Driscoll, J., & Kraay, A. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics. 80(4), 549–560.

Ezrow, L., & Hellwig, T. (2014). Responding to voters or responding to markets? Political parties and public opinion in an era of globalization. International Studies Quarterly, 58, 816–827.

Ezrow, L., Böhmelt, T., & Lehrer, R. (2017). Exploring the effects of party policy diffusion on parties’ election strategies. IHS Political Science Series Working Paper, No. 144.

Garrett, G. (1998). Partisan politics in the global economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Garrett, G. (2001). Globalization and government spending around the world. Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(4), 3–29.

Garrett, G., & Mitchell, D. (2001). Globalization, government spending and taxation in the OECD. European Journal of Political Research, 39, 145–177.

Green, J. & Hobolt, S. (2008). Owning the issue agenda: Party strategies and vote choice in British election. Electoral Studies, 27, 460–476 .

Haupt, A. B. (2010). Parties' responses to economic globalization: What is left for the left and right for the right? Party Politics, 16(1), 5–27.

Herwartz, H., & Theilen, B. (2014). Partisan influence on social spending under market integration, fiscal pressure and institutional change. European Journal of Political Economy, 34, 409–424.

Hibbs, D. (1987). The American political economy: Macroeconomics and electoral politics. Harvard University Press.

Hickman, D. C., & Onley, W. W. (2011). Globalization and investment in human capital. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 64(4), 654–672.

Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regression with cross-sectional dependence. The Stata Journal, 7(3), 281–312.

Hwang, W., & Lee, H. (2014). Globalization, Factor Mobility, Partisanship and Compensation policies. International Studies Quarterly, 58, 92–105.

Imbeau, L.M. (2009). Do they walk like they talk? Speech and action in policy processes. Springer, Heidelberg.

Kayser, M. A. (2009). Partisan Waves: International Business Cycles and Electoral Choice. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 950–970.

Klingemann, H-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., Budge, I., & McDonald. M. (2006). Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, European Union, and OECD 1990-2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Laver, M., & Budge, I. (1992). Measuring policy distances and modeling coalition formation. Party policy and government coalitions, 15–40.

Leibrecht, M., Klien, M., & Onaran, O. (2011). Globalization, welfare regimes and social protection expenditures in Western and Eastern European countries. Public Choice, 148, 569–594.

Meinhard, S., & Potrafke, N. (2012). The globalization–welfare state nexus reconsidered. Review of International Economics, 20(2), 271–287.

McDonald, M., & Budge, I. (2005). Elections, Parties, Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mikhaylov, S., Laver, M., & Benoit, K. (2012). Coder Reliability and Misclassification in the Human Coding of Party Manifestos. Political Analysis, 20(1), 78–91.

Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic model with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1417–1426.

OECD (2013). Economic Outlook: Annual Projections. No 93.

Osterloh, S., & Debus, M. (2012). Partisan politics in corporate taxation. European Journal of Political Economy, 28, 192–207.

Pesaran, M.H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, 0435, University of Cambridge.

Rodrik, D. (1997). Has globalization gone too far? Washington, D, C.: Institute for International Economics.

Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger government? Journal of Political Economy, 106, 997–1032.

Roodman, D. (2009). A note to the Theme of Too Many Instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158.

Staiger, D. & Stock, J.H. (1997). Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments. Econometrica, 65(3), 557–586.

Volkens, A., Lehmann, P., Matthieß, T., Merz, N., & Regel, S. (2016): The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG / CMP / MARPOR). Version 2016b. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).

Walter, S. (2010). Globalization and the welfare state: Testing the microfoundations of the compensation hypothesis. International Studies Quarterly, 54, 403–426.

Ward, H., Ezrow, L., & Dorussen, H. (2011). Globalization, party positions, and the median voter. World Politics, 63(3), 509–547.

Ward, D., Kim, J., Graham, M., Tavits, M. (2015). How economic integration affects party issue emphases. Comparative Political Studies, 1–33.

Williams, L. (2015). It’s all relative: Spatial positioning of parties and ideological shifts. European Journal of Political Research. 54(1), 141–59.