The environmental impact of globalization on Latin America: a prospective approach

Chichilnisky, Graciela and Gallopin, G. (2000): The environmental impact of globalization on Latin America: a prospective approach. Published in: Managing Human-Dominated Ecosystems (2001): pp. 271-303.

Abstract

Current changes in Latin America include the abandonment of the economic pattern of import substitution, a growing opening of the national economies, a continental wave of political democratization, an apparent economic recovery from the "lost decade" (the 1980s), a growing social polarization, a worsening of environmental problems, the growing influence of the market, and the most intense urbanization process on the planet. The aim of this paper is not to discuss the advantages or disadvantages of the prevailing economic pattern, but only to analyze some of the possible environmental implications derived from the way of insertion of the countries of the region in the global economy. The region as a whole is relatively well endowed in terms of natural resources. With little more than 8% of the global population, Latin America has 23% of the potentially arable land, 10% of the cultivated land, 17% of the pastures, 22% of the forests (and 52% of the tropical forests), and 31% of the permanently usable freshwater. It has not less than 3% of the world reserves of fossil fuel and 19% of the technically usable hydroelectric Power.

Regarding economic globalization, the general argument from the environmental point of view is not that international trade is negative and that autarchy is desirable, but rather that a certain degree of regulation is necessary to reach a "sustainable free trade." The technological aspect of globalization is so important that it is possible to speak of a true techno-economic revolution or Knowledge Revolution (see also Chichilnisky's chapter in this book), led by microelectronics and the information technologies, and accompanied by a constellation of developments based on new technologies intensive in science (biotechnology, new materials, new energy sources, nanotechnology, etc.). From the point of view of their environmental implications, many of the new and emergent technologies exhibit interesting differences with the previous technological paradigm. The attributes of the new paradigm having higher strategic interest can be characterized as ambivalence, flexibility, and knowledge-intensivity. The technical potential for ecologically sustainable development is higher today than in any moment of the past. However, the direction toward which the trajectories of the new techno-economic paradigm seem to be moving suggests that, unless Latin America adopts active and sustained strategies to carry out the necessary social, economic, and technological structural changes, the mentioned technical potential is likely to materialize only in the most advanced countries, with the region running the serious danger of concentrating the perverse effects of the techno-economic revolution.

A prospective analysis was carried out, based on simple simulation models of the ecosystemic transformations associated to land use in each of the 18 major lifezones represented in Latin America. Two basic socioeconomic scenarios were defined by the whole region: the reference scenario and the sustainable scenario. The reference scenario suggests the type of environmental consequences associated with land use that an unrestricted and unregulated opening of the economies (in the context of an absence or widespread weakness of environmental and social policies) would have. The sustainable scenario shows that, from the ecological and technological points of view, it is possible to change direction toward a much more desirable long-term situation, without too large direct economic costs. Implications of strategic importance for the sustainable development of the region are identified.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Latin America; environment; urbanization; natural resources; sustainable free trade; globalization; technology; ecosystems; modeling; climate change; resource extraction; overuse
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products; N - Economic History > N5 - Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment, and Extractive Industries > N56 - Latin America ; Caribbean; F - International Economics > F0 - General > F01 - Global Outlook

References

Berry, A. 1995. The Social Challenge of the New Economic Era in Latin America. FO- CAL/CIS Discussion Paper. Centre for International Studies, Toronto.

CDMA-ALC (Comision de Desarrollo y Medio Ambiente de America Latina y El Car- ibe). 1990. Nuestra Propia Agenda. IDB/UNDP, Washington, D.C.

Chayanov, A. V 1925. Published by the Moscow Institute of Scientific Research of Agri- cultural Economy. Spanish translation 1974. La organizacion de la unidad economca campesina. Nueva Vision, Buenos Aires..

Chichilnisky, G. 1993. North South trade, property rights and the dynamics of renewable resources. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics [Oxford University Press] 4(2): 219-248.

Chichilnisky, G. 1994a. North South Trade and the Global Environment. American Eco- nomic Review 84(4): 851-874.

Chichilnisky, G. 19946. Traditional comparative advantages vs. increasing returns to scale: NAFTA and the WTO. CHECK In M. di Matteo Baldassarri & R. Mundel (editors), International Problems of Economic Interdependence St. Martin Press.

Chichilnisky, G. 1995. Strategies for trade liberalization in the Americas. Pp. 165-188 in Trade Liberalization in the Western Hemisphere. InterAmerican Development Bank, United Nations, Economic Comission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) Washington, D.C.

Chichilnisky, G. 1995-1996. The economic value of the Earth's resources. Invited Per- spectives article in Trends in Ecology and Evolution (TREE) 135-140.

Chichilnisky, G. 1996. Trade regimes and GATT Resource intensive vs. knowledge in- tensive growth. Economic Systems 20: 147-181.

Chichilnisky, G. 1997. Ecology and the Knowledge Revolution. Plenary Lecture at the Na- tional-Academy of Sciences Second Forum on Biodiversiry, "Nature and Human Soci- ety," 27-29 October 1997, Washington, D.C., published in the Proceedings (P Raven, editor).

Chichilnisky, G. 1998. The Knowledge Revolution: Its impact on consumption and re- source use. In S. Fukuda-Parr (editor), 1998 Human Development Report United Nations Development Program, New York.

Chichilnisky, G. & G. Heal. 1998. Economic returns from the biosphere. Nature 391: 629-631.

Daly, H. & R. Goodland. 1994. An ecological-economic assessment of deregulation of in- ternational commerce under GATT. Ecological Economics 9: 73-92.

De Bellevue, E. B., E. Hitzel, K. Cline, J. A. Benitez, J. Ramos-Miranda & O. Segura. 1994. The North American Free Trade Agreement: An ecological-economic synthe- sis for the United States and Mexico. Ecological Economics 9: 53-71.

Dourojeanni, M. J. 1982. Renewable Natural Resources of Latin America and the Carib- bean: Situation and Trends. World Wildlife Fund, Washington, D.C.

ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean). 1995. Panorama Social de America Latina. CEPAL, Santiago, Chile.

ECLAC. 2000. Equidad, desarrollo y ciudadania. CEPAL, Santiago, Chile.

Ekins, P, C. Folke & R. Constanza. 1994. Trade, environment and development: The issues in perspective. Ecological Economics 9: 1-12.

FAO-FNUAP-IIASA. 1984. Capacidades potenciales de carga demografica de las tierras del mundo en desarrollo. FAO, Rome.

Furtado, C. 1984. O futuro da America Latina. Pp. 67-72 in Seminario. A Crise Presente e o Futuro da America Latina. SP, 1984. Anais. SP, CESP, 1985.

Gallopin, G. C. 1980. Development and environment: An illustrative model. Journal of Policy Modelling 2: 239-254.

Gallopin, G. C. 1990a. Rapport Ecologique sur Notre Planete. Relations N1 564: 247-250.

Gallopin, G. C. 19906. The environmental sustainability of development and technologi- cal change in Latin America and the Caribbean. LC/L. 577 (Sem.56/2); 8 August 1990; United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean - ECLAC-; Santiago de Chile.

Gallopin, G. C. 1991. Human dimensions on global change: Linking the global and the local processes. International Social Science Journal 130: 707-718.

Gallopin, G. 'C. 1992. Science, technology and the ecological future of Latin America. World Development 20(10): 1391-1400.

Gallopin, G. C. 1994. Impoverishment and Sustainable Development. A Systems Ap- proach. International Institute of Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, Canada.

Gallopin, G. C. (Editor). 1995. El Futuro Ecologico de un Continente. Una Vision Prospectiva de la America Latina. United Nations University Press and Fondo de Cultura Economica, Mexico, D.F. Two volumes.

Gallopin, G. C. 1995a. Medio ambiente, desarrollo y cambio tecnologico en la America Latina. Pp. 483-539 in G. C. Gallopin (editor), El Futuro Ecologico de un Continente. Una Vision Prospectiva de la America Latina. United Nations University Press and Fondo de Cultura Economca, Mexico, D.F. Volume Il.

Gallopin, G. C. & C. A. Barrera. 1980. A Semi-quantitative mathematical model of the interactions between ecological and socio-economic factors in the Chaco Province (Argentina). Manuscript, Grupo de Analisis de Sistemas Ecologicos. S.C. Bariloche, Argentina.

Gallopin, G. C. & P Raskin. 1998. Windows on the Future: Global Scenarios & Sustainability. Environment 40(3): 6-11 & 26-31.

Gallopin, G. C. & M. Winograd. 1992. Obstaculos y oportunidades para el desarrollo sustentable en America Latina. Pp. 1-30 in Fundacion MAPFRE, Problematica futura del Medio Ambiente en America Latina. Editorial MAPFRE, Madrid.

Gallopin, G. C. & M. Winograd. 1995. Ecological prospective for tropical Latin America. Pp. 13-44 in T Nishizawa & J. I. Uitto (editors), The Fragile Tropics of Latin America: Sustainable Management of Changing Environments. United Nations Uni- versity Press, Tokyo.

Gallopin, G. C., M. Winograd. & I. Gomez. 1991. Ambiente y Desarrollo en America Latina y el Caribe: Problemas, Oportunidades, y Prioridades. Grupo de Andlisis de Sistemas Ecologicos, S.C. Bariloche, Rfo Negro, Argentina.

Gomez, I. A. & G. C. Gallopin. 1995. Potencia l agrfcola de la America Latina. Pp. 497- 547 in G. C. Gallopin (editor), El Futuro Ecologico de un Continente. Una Vision Prospectiva de la America Latina. United Nations University Press and Fondo de Cultura Economca, Mexico, D.F. Volume I.

Grossman, R. & A. Krueger. 1991. Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research WP 3914, Harvard Uni- versity, Cambridge Massachusetts.

Herrera, A. O. 1986. The new technological wave and the developing countries: Prob- lems and options. Pp. 140-153 in E. MacLeod (editor), Technology and the Human Prospects. Frances Pinter, London.

Kristrom, B. 1996. Income Elasticity of the Demand for Environmental Goods and Ser- vices. Working Paper, Swedish Agricultural University, Umea.

Maletta, H. 1988. Macroeconomic Constraints on Soil Conservation in Andean Peasant Agriculture. Report to the Grupo de Analisis de Sistemas Ecologicos, S.C. Bariloche, Argentina.

Nochteff, H. 1987. Revolucion Tecnologica, Autonomfa Nacional, y Democracia. Monogr. e Inf. de Investigacion N1 59. FLACSO, Buenos Aires.

Perez, C. 1986. Las nuevas tecnologfas: Una vision de conjunto. Pp. 44-89 in C. Ominami (editor), La Tercera Revolucion Industrial. Impactos Internacionales del Actual Viraje Tecnologico. Grupo Editor Latinoamericano, Buenos Aires.

PNUD (Programs de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo; United Nations Develop- ment Programme-UNDP-). 1989. Documento Tocnico y Declaracion Regional sobre la Pobreza. PNUD, Bogota, Colombia.

PNUMA-AECI-MOPU (Programs de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente- PNUMA-, Agencia Espanola de Cooperacion Internacional-AECI- y Ministerio de Obras Publicas y Urbanismo-MOPU). 1990. Desarrollo y Medio Ambiente en America Latina y el Caribe: Una vision evolutiva. MOPU, Madrid, Espana.

Repetto, R. 1993. Trade and the Environment: Achieving Comp] ementarities and Avoid- ing Conflicts. WRI. Washington, D.C.

Ropke, I. 1994. Trade, development and sustainability-A critical assessment of the "free trade dogma." Ecological Economics 9: 13-22.

Runnalls, D. & A. Cosbey. 1992. Trade and Sustainable Development: A Survey of the Issues and a New Research Agenda. International Institute for Sustainable Develop- ment, Winnipeg.

Schaper, M. 1999. Impactos ambientales de los cambios en la estructura exportadora en nueve parses de America Latina y el Caribe: 1980-1995. Serie Medio ambiente y desarollo No. 9, Comision Economica para America Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), Santiago, Chile.

Schwartz, P 1991. The Art of the Long View. Doubleday, New York.

Schneider, S. H. 1989. The Greenhouse Effect: Science and policy. Science 243: 771-781.

Sedjo, R.A. 1989. Forests: A tool to moderate global warming? Environment 31(1): 14- 20.

Silva, J. E. da (Editor). 1994. Consideracoes sobre o use actual e potencial das terras do Cerrado sob o aspecto da sustentabilidade agricola. In: Strategies for Sustainable Agricultural Land Use in the Lowland Savannas of South America (SSALLSSA).

Annex I. Country Documents. Project Proposal, CIAT Cali.

South Centre, The. 1996. Liberalization and globalization. The issues at stake for the South and for UNCTAD. South Letter NI 25, Vols. 1 & 2: 2-7.

Sunkel, O. & N. Gligo (Editors). 1980. Estilos de desarrollo y medio ambiente en la America Latina. Fondo de Cultura Economica, Mexico. Two volumes.

Tabatabai, H. 1995. Poverty and inequality in developing countries: A review of evi- dence. In: G. Rodgers & R. Van der Hoeven (editors), The Poverty Agenda: Trends and Policy Options. ILO, Geneva.

The World Bank. 2000. World Development Report 2000/2001. Attacking Poverty. Ox- ford University Press, Oxford.

Thurow, L. 1996. The Future of Capitalism: How Today's Economic Forces Shape

Tomorrow's World. William Morrow, New York.

United Nations. 1994. World Population 1994. Population Division. Department for

Economic and Social Information and Policy Analysis; ST/ESA/SER.A/142, New York.

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 1996. Human Development Re- port 1996. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.

UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 1999. Global Environment Outlook 2000. Earthscan, London.

Winograd, M. 1995. Simulacion del use de tierras: Escenarios predominante y sostenible. Pp. 371-482 in G. C. Gallopin (editor), El Futuro Ecologico de un Continente. Una Vision Prospectiva de la America Latina. United Nations University Press and Fondo de Cultura Economica, Mexico, D.F Volume I.

Winograd, M. 1995a. Indicadores ambientales para Latinoamerica y el Caribe: Hacia la Sustenta-bilidad en el Uso de Tierras. IICA, San Jose, Costa Rica.

Winograd, M. 1995b. Anexo de los Capitulos 1 y 2. Clasificacion de los Grandes Ecosistemas por Zonas de Vida. Pp. 164-180 and 371-482 in G. C. Gallopin (editor), El Futuro Ecologico de un Continente. Una Vision Prospectiva de la Amdrica Latina. United Nations University Press and Fondo de Cultura Economica, Mexico, D.F. Volume I.

WRI (World Resources Institute). 1996. World Resources 1996-97. WRI/UNEP/UNDP/ WB. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.