Frequency of testing. Lessons from a field experiment in higher education.

Cid, Alejandro and Cabrera, José María and Bernatzky, Marianne (2017): Frequency of testing. Lessons from a field experiment in higher education.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of frequent testing on the performance of undergraduate freshmen. Methodology The impact evaluation of the intervention is designed as a field experiment -a randomized control trial. First, instructor divided the class in groups of three students in a joint-liability framework, a setting that fosters peer monitoring among students. Then, the groups were randomly assigned to high-frequency testing (tests on a weekly schedule) or a low-frequency testing (tests on a biweekly schedule). Each testing condition lasted for 15 weeks, and data on academic achievement were collected both before and after the intervention. Findings Although high-frequency groups show a higher mean performance on academic results, the findings do not indicate a definitive improvement in performance in weekly versus biweekly testing. We related our findings with recent discoveries on students’ perception of frequent assessments and its relation to motivation. Originality A large body of educational literature investigates the effect of the frequency of testing on learning performance. Less attention has been devoted to explore the mechanisms behind that relationship. We contribute to this emerging literature analyzing the effect of test frequency on a sample of Uruguayan university students, in a novel setting (a joint-liability framework), exploring mechanisms and suggesting lessons for future research.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Keywords: frequent assessment; intrinsic motivation; grades; perceptions; classroom field experiment; feedback; procrastination
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions

References

Adesope, O. O., Trevisan, D. A., & Sundararajan, N. (2017). Rethinking the Use of Tests: A Meta-Analysis of Practice Testing. Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 659- 701.

Adkins, J. K., & Linville, D. (2017). Testing Frequency in an Introductory Computer Programming Course. Information Systems Education Journal, 15(3), 22.

Ariely, D., & Wertenbroch, K. (2002). Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: Selfcontrol by precommitment. Psychological science, 13(3), 219-224.

Azmat, G., & Iriberri, N. (2010). The importance of relative performance feedback information: Evidence from a natural experiment using high school students. Journal of Public Economics, 94(7), 435-452.

Bandiera, O., Larcinese, V., & Rasul, I. (2015). Blissful ignorance? A natural experiment on the effect of feedback on students' performance. Labour Economics, 34(European Association of Labour Economists 26th Annual Conference), 13-25.

Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kinnan, C. (2015). The miracle of microfinance? Evidence from a randomized evaluation. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(1), 22-53.

Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1991). Effects of frequent classroom testing. The Journal of Educational Research, 85(2), 89-99.

Becchetti, L., & Pisani, F. (2010). Microfinance, Subsidies and Local Externalities. Small Business Economics, 34(3), 309-321.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, 5(1), 7-74.

Bloom, N., Eifert, B., Mahajan, A., McKenzie, D., & Roberts, J. (2013). Does management matter? Evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128, 1-51.

Cabrera, J.M., & Cid, A. (2017). Gender Differences to Relative Performance Feedback: A Field Experiment in Education. Working paper, Universidad de Montevideo. Retrieved from:http://fcee.um.edu.uy/investigacion/areas/

Cabrera, J.M., & Cid, A. (2013). Joint-Liability vs. Individual Incentives in the Classroom. Lessons from a Field Experiment with Undergraduate Students. Working Paper. Retrieved from: http://www2.um.edu.uy/jmcabrera/Research/Jointly_Liability_vs_Individual_Incentives_28012014.pdf

Crepón, B., Devoto, F., Duflo, E., & Perienté, W. (2011). Impact of microcredit in rural areas of Morocco: Evidence from a randomized evaluation. J-PAL working paper. Retrieved from http://economics.mit.edu/files/6659.

De Paola, M., & Scoppa, V. (2011). Frequency of examinations and student achievement in a randomized experiment. Economics of Education Review, 30(6), 1416-1429.

Domenech, J., Blazquez, D., De la Poza, E., & Mun͂oz-Miquel, A. (2015). Exploring the impact of cumulative testing on academic performance of undergraduate students in Spain. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 27(2), 153-169.

Duflo, E., Banerjee, A., Glennerster, R., & Kinnan, C. (2013). The Miracle of Microfinance? Evidence from a randomized evaluation. NBER Working Paper No. 18950.

Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Does your assessment support your students’ learning. Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 3-31.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112.

Kika, F. M., McLaughlin, T. F., & Dixon, J. (1992). Effects of frequent testing of secondary algebra students. The Journal of Educational Research, 85(3), 159-162.

Murphy, D. P., & Stanga, K. G. (1994). The effects of frequent testing in an income tax course: An experiment. Journal of Accounting Education, 12(1), 27-41.

Rossi, M. (2014). The impact of individual wealth on posterior political power. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 106, 469-480.

Schrank, Z. (2016). An Assessment of Student Perceptions and Responses to Frequent Low-stakes Testing in Introductory Sociology Classes. Teaching Sociology, 44(2), 118-127.

Vaessen, B. E., van den Beemt, A., van de Watering, G., van Meeuwen, L. W., Lemmens, L., & den Brok, P. (2017). Students’ perception of frequent assessments and its relation to motivation and grades in a statistics course: a pilot study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 872-886.