Facilitating economic development through the reform of economic instruction

Osipian, Ararat (2004): Facilitating economic development through the reform of economic instruction.

Abstract

Economic development in many ways depends on the level of human capital in the national economy, including that of economists. Market reforms in the former Soviet Bloc urged drastic changes in economic curriculum necessary to prepare the next generation of economic leaders. This paper states that the reform of economic instruction in the Former Soviet Union should focus on both learning and action. The incorporation of mathematical methods into the new economic curriculum will occur based on close cooperation among mathematicians and economists. The new economic instruction will have an interdisciplinary character and a multidisciplinary setting. There are several second order organizational changes that need to be made. Bachelor and Master’s Degrees should replace the five-year degree. Changes in the curriculum should include separation of core courses and electives including those from other majors, detail-oriented content of the courses, a decreased number of classes per semester and increased time for each class. Faculty retraining should be coordinated both within and between the universities. Financial incentives should be created to encourage the instructors to participate in retraining, to change the content and method of the instruction, and to work effectively in the classroom.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: economics, economic instruction, education, reform, transition
• Subjects: P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions > P36 - Consumer Economics ; Health ; Education and Training ; Welfare, Income, Wealth, and Poverty; A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A22 - Undergraduate; P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P21 - Planning, Coordination, and Reform

References

Ailes, C., & Rushing, F. (1991). Soviet Math and Science Educational Reforms during Perestroika. Technology in Society, 13, pp. 109-122. Alexeev, M., Gaddy, C., & Leitzel, J. (1992). Economics in the Former Soviet Union. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6(2), pp. 137-148. Azrael, J. (1965). Patterns of Polity-Directed Educational Development: Soviet Union. In: Education and Political Development, ed. by James Coleman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Berger, M. (1981). Coping with Anarchy in Organizations. In: Annual Handbook for Group Facilitators, ed. by John E. Jones and J. William Pfeiffer. San Diego, CA: University Associates. Birnbaum, R. (1988). How Colleges Work: The Cybernetics of Academic Organization and Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Blodgett, R., & Schnitzer, M. (1965). Soviet Teaching and Research in Economics. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. Brue, S., & MacPhee, C. (1995). From Marx to Market: Reform of the University Economics Curriculum in Russia. The Journal of Economic Education, 26(2), pp. 182-194. Clune, W. (1998). Toward a Theory of Systemic Reform: The Case of Nine NSF Statewide Systemic Initiatives. National Institute for Science Education Research Monograph #16. Madison, WI: NISE. Curriculum for the Master of Arts in Economics Program for the Academic Year 2003-2004. New Economic School, Moscow, http://www.nes.ru/english/about/program.htm, accessed May 22, 2004. Dolan, E., & Lindsey, D. (1991). Economics, 6-th edition. Orlando, FL: Dryden. Flynn, J. (1988). Russia’s ‘University Question’: Origins to Great Reforms 1802-1863. In: History of Universities. Vol. VII, ed. by L. Brockliss. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1978. Samuelson in Soviet Russia: A Report. Journal of Economic Literature, 16, pp. 560-573. Judy, R. (1960). Economics at Moscow State University. Cambridge, MA: Russian Research Center, Harvard University. Katalog Uchebnyh Programm Ekonomicheskogo Fakulteta MGU po Napravleniyu “Ekonomika,” 1995 [Course Catalogue for Economics Majors at the School of Economics in Moscow State University, 1995]. Moscow: Ekonomicheski Fakultet MGU. Katalog Uchebnyh Programm Ekonomicheskogo Fakulteta MGU po Napravleniyu “Ekonomika,” 1998-1999, 1999-2000 [Course Catalogue for Economics Majors at the School of Economics in Moscow State University, 1998-1999, 1999-2000]. Moscow: Ekonomicheski Fakultet MGU. Katalog Uchebnyh Programm Ekonomicheskogo Fakulteta HGU po Napravleniyu “Ekonomika,” 1995 [Course Catalogue for Economics Majors at the School of Economics in Kharkov State University, 1995]. Kharkov: Ekonomicheski Fakultet HGU. Kolesov, V. (2002). O vaucherizacii vysshego obrazovanija [About Voucherization of Higher Education]. Moscow: MGU. http://www.econ.msu.ru/dp.php3?id=254, accessed December 24, 2002. Kovzik, A., & Watts, M. (2001). Reforming Undergraduate Instruction in Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine. The Journal of Economic Education, 32, pp. 78-92. McConnell, C., & Brue, S. (1990). Economics, 11-th edition. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. McLaughlin, M. (1987). Learning From Experience: Lessons From Policy Implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), pp. 171-178. Peterson, P., McCarthey, S., & Richard Elmore, R. (1996). Learning from School Restructuring. American Educational Research Journal, 33(1), pp. 119-153. Rushing, F. (1994). The Changing Face of Economic Instruction in Russia. In: An International Perspective on Economic Education, ed. by William B. Walstad. Boston, MA: Kluwer. Shiller, R., Boycko, M., & Korobov, V. (1992). Hunting for Homo Sovieticus: Situational Versus Attitudinal Factors in Economic Behavior. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Tsagolov, N. (1973). Kurs Politicheskoi Ekonomii [A Course in Political Economy, 3-rd edition]. Moscow: Ekonomika. Vinovskis, M. (1996). An Analysis of Concept and Uses of Systemic Educational Reform. American Educational Research Journal, 33(1), pp. 53-85.