Cid, Alejandro and Cabrera, José María (2017): Allocation of Usufruct Rights in Informal Markets: Evidence form the Streets. Published in: Economic Analysis Review , Vol. 32, No. 2 (October 2017): pp. 39-64.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_84736.pdf Download (470kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We analyze the results of a policy of massive allocation of usufruct rights to cuidacoches: persons performing surveillance of parked vehicles in the streets. Surprisingly, despite the low cost and the considerable benefits to legally acquiring the right of use on the block, half of the potential beneficiaries have rejected the subscription to the program. In order to understand this market and the mobility between being in the legal framework or outside the law, we built a unique database containing economic and sociodemographic information from cuidacoches in Montevideo. We highlight four findings: the heterogeneity in the reasons for accepting or rejecting the legal framework; the protection of the right of usufruct on the block as the main perceived benefit of complying with the legal framework; the desire to change jobs for the vast majority, and the low saving capacity.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Allocation of Usufruct Rights in Informal Markets: Evidence form the Streets |
English Title: | Allocation of Usufruct Rights in Informal Markets: Evidence form the Streets |
Language: | Spanish |
Keywords: | Usufruct rights; property rights; social mobility; aspirations; labor market |
Subjects: | I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J4 - Particular Labor Markets O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O12 - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development |
Item ID: | 84736 |
Depositing User: | Alejandro Cid |
Date Deposited: | 21 Feb 2018 07:42 |
Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2019 23:44 |
References: | ACEMOGLU, D. y D. AUTOR (2011). “Skills, tasks, and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings”, Handbook of labor economics 4, pp. 1043-1171. ACEMOGLU, D., S. JOHNSON y J.A. ROBINSON (2001). “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation”, American Economic Review 91 (5), pp. 1369-1401. ACEMOGLU, D., S. JOHNSON y J.A. ROBINSON (2012). “Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long Run”, Handbook of Economic Growth 1A, pp. 386-472. ALBRECHT, J., L. NAVARRO y S. VROMAN (2009). “The Effects of Labor Market Policies in an Economy with an Informal Sector”, The Economic Journal 119 (539), pp. 1105-1129. BANERJEE, V.A. y E. DUFLO (2011). Poor Economics: a radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. Public Affairs, New York. 60 REVISTA DE ANALISIS ECONOMICO, VOL. 32, Nº 2 BANERJEE, V.A. y E. DUFLO (2006). “The Economic Lives of the Poor”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, pp. 1-28. BESLEY, J.T., K.B. BURCHARDI y M. GHATAK (2012). “Incentives and the De Soto Effect”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 127 (1), pp. 237-282. BESLEY, J.T., K.B. BURCHARDI y M. GHATAK (2010). “Property Rights and Economic Development”, Handbook of Development Economics 5, pp. 4525-4595. BESLEY, J.T. (1995). “Property Rights and Investment Incentives: Theory and Evidence from Ghana”,Journal of Political Economy 103 (5), pp. 903-937. BUCHELI, M. y R. CENI (2007). “Informality: Sectoral Selection and Earnings in Uruguay”. Documento de Trabajo 20/07. Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, UdelaR. CRAWFORD, V.P. y J. MENG (2011). “New York City Cab Drivers’ Labor Supply Revisited: Reference-Dependent Preferences with Rational-Expectations Targets for Hours and Income”, American Economic Review 101, pp. 1912-1932. DE PAULA, A. y J.A. SCHEINKMAN (2011). “The Informal Sector: An Equilibrium Model and Some Empirical Evidence from Brazil”, The Review of Incomes and Wealth 57 (1), pp. 1-22. DEMSETZ, H. (1967). “Towards a Theory of Property Rights”, American Economic Review P&P 57 (2), pp. 347-359. FIELD, E. (2007). “Entitled to Work: Urban Property Rights and Labor Supply in Peru”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 122 (4), pp. 1561-1602. FIELDS, S.G. (2004). “A Guide to Multisector Labor Market Models”, Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Working Papers, pp. 1-50. FUGAZZA, M. y J. JACQUES (2003). “Labor Market Institutions, Taxation and the Underground Economy”, Journal of Public Economics 88, pp. 395-418. GALIANI, S. y E. SCHARGRODSKY (2010). “Property Rights for the Poor: Effects of land titling”, Journal of Public Economics 94, pp. 700-729. GANDELMAN, N. (2009). “Inter-Generational Effects of Titling Programs: Physical vs. Human Capital” Documento de investigación Nº 50, Universidad ORT. GËRXHANI, K. (2004). “The Informal Sector in Developed and Less Developed Countries”, Public Choice, pp. 1-29. HIRSHLEIFER, J. (1995). “Anarchy and Its Breakdown”, Journal of Politic Economy 103 (1), pp. 26-52. LANJOUW, O.J. y P.I. LEVY (2002). “Untitled: A Study of Formal and Informal Property Rights in Urban Ecuador”, Economic Journal 112 (482), pp. 986-1019. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/84736 |