Relacje międzyorganizacyjne

Klimczuk-Kochańska, Magdalena (2016): Relacje międzyorganizacyjne. Published in: Zarządzanie, organizacje i organizowanie - przegląd perspektyw teoretycznych (2016): pp. 345-356.

Abstract

Polish Abstract: Znaczenie współpracy międzyorganizacyjnej stale rośnie. Kooperacja odgrywa ważną rolę w procesach tworzenia nowych produktów i usług, a tylko niewielka grupa firm może pozwolić sobie na działanie w pojedynkę (Hamel, Doz i Prahalad, 1989, s. 133). Rozwój strategii współpracy pozwala przedsiębiorstwu na zajęcie lepszej pozycji konkurencyjnej na rynku. Wspólnie z partnerami może ono wypracowywać usprawnienia w ofercie rynkowej czy zdobywać wiedzę o nowych rynkach zbytu. Kooperacja wiąże się z bliskością organizacyjną podmiotów oraz tworzeniem sieci międzyorganizacyjnych (ang. inter-organizational networks). Sieć międzyorganizacyjna jest zorganizowaną formą działalności gospodarczej, którą kieruje jedno lub kilka przedsiębiorstw, dążących do osiągnięcia przewagi konkurencyjnej (Sydow, 1997, s. 20). Wśród podstawowych rodzajów gospodarczych układów sieciowych wymienić można alianse strategiczne, spółki joint ventures, klastry gospodarcze czy organizacje wirtualne. Jak wynika z analiz przeprowadzonych przez Amalyę L. Oliver i Marka Ebersa (1998), w badaniach nad relacjami międzyorganizacyjnymi w latach 1980-1996 najczęściej korzystano z perspektywy podejścia zasobowego (ang. resource-based view) i teorii sieci społecznych (ang. social network theory), ale wyjaśnienia tendencji do rozwoju relacji sieciowych można poszukiwać również w ekonomii neoinstytucjonalnej, teorii gier czy dorobku różnorodnych szkół zarządzania strategicznego.

English Abstract: The importance of inter-organizational cooperation is constantly growing. Cooperation plays an important role in the processes of creating new products and services, and only a small group of companies can afford to act alone (Hamel, Doz and Prahalad, 1989, p. 133). The development of a cooperation strategy allows the company to take a better competitive position on the market. Together with partners, it can develop improvements in the market offer or gain knowledge about new sales markets. Cooperation is related to the organizational proximity of entities and the creation of inter-organizational networks. An inter-organizational network is an organized form of economic activity, which is managed by one or several enterprises seeking to achieve a competitive advantage (Sydow, 1997, p. 20). The basic types of economic network systems include strategic alliances, joint ventures, economic clusters or virtual organizations. As results from the analyzes carried out by Amalya L. Oliver and Marek Ebers (1998), in the research on the inter-organizational relations in the years 1980-1996, the most frequently used were the resource-based view and social network theories. theory), but the explanations of the tendency to develop network relations can also be sought in neoinstitutional economics, game theory or the achievements of various strategic management schools.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Inter-organizational Relations
• Language: Polish
• Keywords: Inter-organizational Relations
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D85 - Network Formation and Analysis: Theory; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L14 - Transactional Relationships ; Contracts and Reputation ; Networks

References

Becattini, G. (1979). Dal settore industriale al distretto industriale. Alcune considerazioni sull�funita di indagine dell�feconomia industrial. Rivista di Economia e Politica Industriale, 1, 7.21.

Becattini, G. (1986). The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion. W: F. Pyke, G. Becattini, W. Sengenberger (red.), Industrial districts and inter-firm co-operation in Italy (s. 37.51). Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.

Beckert, J. (1996). Economic action what is sociological about economic sociology? Uncertainty and the embeddedness of economic action. Theory and Society, 25(6), 803.840.

Bogers, M. (2011). The open innovation paradox: knowledge sharing and protection in R&D collaborations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(1), 93.117.

Bradach, J.L. (1997). Using the plural form in the management of restaurants chains. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 276.303.

Bradach, J.L., Eccles, R.G. (1989). Price, authority, and trust. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 97.118.

Brandenburger, A.M., Nalebuff, B.J. (1996). Co-opetition: 1. A revolutionary mindset that combines competition and cooperation 2. The game theory strategy that�fs changing the game of business. New York: Currency Doubleday.

Byrne, J.A., Brandt, R., Port, O. (1993). The virtual corporation. The company of the future will be the ultimate in adaptability. Business Week, 8 February 1993, 36.40.

Cannon, J.P., Achrol, R.S., Gundlach, G.T. (2000). Contracts, norms, and plural form governance.

Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 28(2), 180.194.

Carayannis, E.G., Campbell, D.F.J. (2012). Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems. 21st-century democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for development. New York: Springer.

Magdalena Klimczuk-Kochańska . Relacje mi.dzyorganizacyjne 353 Chesbrough, H.W. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.

Culpan, R. (2002). Global business alliances: theory and practice. Quorum Books: Westport.

Dagnino, G.B., Padula, G., (2002). Coopetition strategy. A new kind of interfirm dynamics for value creation. EURAM . the European Academy of Management Annual Conference, Stockholm, 9.11 May 2002. Pozyskano z: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228605296_Coo petition_Strategy_A_New_Kind_of_Interfirm_Dynamics_for_Value_Creation (12.12.2015).

Doz, Y. L., Hamel G. (1998). Alliance advantage. The art of creating value through partnering.

Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Dussauge, P., Garrette, B., Mitchell, W. (2000). Learning from competing partners: outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia. Strategic Management Journal, 21(2), 99.126.

Dyer, J.H., Kale, P., Singh, H. (2004). When to ally and when to acquire. Harvard Business Review, 81(7.8), 109.115.

Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The triple helix . university . industry . government relations: a laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, 14(1), 14.19.

Faulkner, D. (1995). International strategic alliances: Co-operate to compete. London: McGraw-Hill.

Frankel, R., Schmitz Whipple, J., Frayer, D.J. (1996). Formal versus informal contracts: achieving alliance success. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 26(3), 47.63.

Gomes-Casseres, B. (1994). Group versus group: how alliance networks compete. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 62.74.

Gomes-Casseres, B. (1996). The alliance revolution: the new shape of business rivalry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure. The problem of embeddedness.

American Journal of Sociology, 91(1), 481.510.

Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and network. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293.317.

Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397.420.

Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 371.385.

Hagel, J., III, Brown, J.S. (2006), Organizacja jutra. Zarz.dzanie talentem, wspo.prac. i specjalizacj..

Gliwice: Wydawnictwo Helion.

Hamel, G., Doz, Y.L., Prahalad, C.K. (1989). Collaborate with your competitors . and win.

Harvard Business Review, 67(1), 133.139.

Hamel, G., Prahalad, C.K. (1993). Strategy as stretch and leverage. Harvard Business Review, 71(2), 75.84.

Harrigan, K.R. (1985). Joint ventures, alliances, and corporate strategy. Washington, DC: Beards Books.

Harrigan, K.R. (1988). Strategic alliance and partner asymmetries. Management International Review, 28, 53.72.

Inkpen, A.C. (2001). Strategic alliances. W: Oxford Handbook of International Business (s. 402.427). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Karthik, I.N.S. (2002). Learning in strategic alliances: an evolutionary perspective. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 6(5), 1.14.

Khanna, T., Gulati, R., Nohria, N. (1998), The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 193.210.

354 IV. ZASOBY, KLIENCI I PARTNERZY Kogut, B. (1991). Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire. Management Science, 37(1), 19.33.

Larsson, R., Bengtsson, L., Henriksson, K., Sparks, J. (1998). The interorganizational learning dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organization Science, 9(3), 285.305.

Malmberg, A., Maskell, P. (2002). The elusive concept of localization economies: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environment and Planning, 34(3), 429.449.

Markusen, A. (1996). Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts. Economic Geography, 72(3), 293.313.

Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics. An introductory volume. 8th edition. London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd.

Mowshowitz, A. (1986). Social dimensions of office automation. Advances in Computers, 25, 335.404.

Mowshowitz, A. (1997). Virtual organization. Communications of the ACM, 40(9), 30.37.

Oliver, A.L., Ebers, M. (1998). Networking network studies: an analysis of conceptual configurations in the study of inter-organizational relationships. Organization Studies, 19(4), 549.583.

Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time.

Boston, MA: Paper Beacon.

Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: The Free Press.

Porter, M.E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. London: MacMillan.

Porter, M.E. (2001). Grona a konkurencja. Nowe programy dzia.ania firm, pa.stw i instytucji. W: M.E. Porter (red.), Porter o konkurencji (s. 245.357). Warszawa: PWE.

Powell, W.W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295.336.

Pyke, F., Sengenberger, W. (red.) (1992). Industrial districts and local economic regeneration.

Geneva: International Institute of Labour Studies.

Rosenfeld, S.A. (1997). Bringing business clusters into the mainstream of economic development.

European Planning Studies, 5(1), 3.23.

Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Stabell, C.B., Fjeldstad, O.D. (1998). Configuring value for competitive advantage: on chains, shops, and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 413.437.

Storper, M. (1995). The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies. Journal of European Urban and Regional Studies, 2(3), 191.221.

Storper, M. (1997). The regional world. Territorial development in a global economy. New York: Guilford.

Sydow, J. (1997). Mitbestimmung und neue Unternehmensnetzwerke. Gutersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung und Hans-Bockler-Stiftung.

Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674.698.

Vyas, N.M., Shelburn, W.L., Rogers, D.C. (1995). An analysis of strategic alliances: forms, functions and framework. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 10(3), 47.60.

Williamson, O.E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. New York: The Free Press.

Williamson, O.E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269.296.