Berka, Martin (2006): Non-linear adjustment in law of one price deviations and physical characteristics of goods. Forthcoming in: Review of International Economics
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_8606.pdf Download (307kB) | Preview |
Abstract
At a level of individual goods, heterogeneity of marginal transaction costs, proxied by price-to-weight ratios and stowage factors, explains a large part of the variation in thresholds of no-adjustment and conditional half-lives of law of one price deviations. Prices of heavier more voluminous) goods deviate further before becoming mean-reverting. Moreover, after becoming mean-reverting, prices of heavier goods converge more slowly. Together with measures of pricing power, market size, distance and exchange rate volatility, these factors explain up to 43% of variation in no-adjustment threshold estimates across 52 goods in US-Canada post Bretton Woods monthly CPI data and are robust in a broader 5-country dataset. They open two avenues for the importance of marginal transaction costs in accounting for real exchange rate persistence: through (a) generating persistence in individual real exchange rate components, and (b) accentuating it by the process of aggregation of heterogeneous components (”aggregation bias” of Imbs, et al. 2005).
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Institution: | Massey University, Department of Commerce |
Original Title: | Non-linear adjustment in law of one price deviations and physical characteristics of goods |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Law of One Price Deviations; Real Exchange Rate Persistence; Non-Linearities; transaction costs; Physical Weight; Physical Volume; Threshold Autregres-sive Models |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F36 - Financial Aspects of Economic Integration F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F31 - Foreign Exchange |
Item ID: | 8606 |
Depositing User: | Prof Martin Berka |
Date Deposited: | 06 May 2008 05:16 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 04:36 |
References: | [1] American Automobile Manufacturers' Association. Motor Vehicles Facts and Figures. AAMA, Washington, D.C., 1996. [2] Anindya Banerjee, Massimiliano Marcellino, and Chiara Osbat. Some cautions on the use of panel methods for integrated series of macro-economic data. manuscript, July 2001. [3] Caroline Betts and Michael B. Devereux. Exchange rate dynamics in a model of pricing- to-market. Journal of International Economics, 50(1):215-244, February 2000. [4] Fabian Bornhorst. On the use of panel unit root tests on cross-sectionally dependent data: an application to PPP. Working Paper ECO 2003/24, European University Institute, November 2003. [5] Ariel Burstein, Joao C. Neves, and Sergio Rebelo. Distribution costs and real ex- change rate dynamics during exchange-rate-based stabilizations. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50:1189-1214, September 2003. [6] Shiu-Sheng Chen and Charles Engel. Does "aggregation bias" explain the PPP puzzle? Working Paper 10304, NBER, February 2004. [7] Mario Crucini, Chris Telmer, and Marios Zachariadis. Dispersion in real exchange rates. Mimeo, Vanderbilt University, Carnegie Mellon University, Ohio State Univer- sity, February 2000. [8] Mario Crucini, Chris Telmer, and Marios Zachariadis. Understanding European real exchange rates. American Economic Review, 95(3):724-738, June 2005. [9] James E. Ertel and Edward B. Fowlkes. Some algorithms for linear splines and piecewise linear regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71:640{648, 1976. [10] C.W.J. Granger and Timo TerÄasvirta. Modelling Nonlinear Economic Relationships. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993. [11] Michael Grossmann and Sarah Markowiz. Alcohol regulation and violence on college campuses. Working Paper 7129, NBER, May 1999. [12] Jonathan Gruber, Anindya Sen, and Mark Stabile. Estimating price elasticities when there is smuggling: the sensitivity of smoking to price in Canada. Working Paper 8962, NBER, May 2002. [13] Bruce Hansen. Inference in TAR models. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econo- metrics, 2(1):1-14, April 1997. [14] David Hummels. Have international transportation costs declined? University of Chicago, July 1999. [15] David Hummels. Time as a trade barrier. Purdue University, July 2001. [16] David Hummels. Towards a geography of trade costs. University of Chicago, September 2001. [17] David Hummels and Alexandre Skiba. Shipping the good apples out? An empirical confirmation of the Alchian-Allen conjecture. Journal of Political Economy, 112:1384{ 1402, 2004. [18] Jean Imbs, Haroon Mumtaz, Morten O. Ravn, and Helene Rey. Non linearites and real exchange rate dynamics. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(2-3):639- 649, April May 2003. [19] Jean Imbs, Haroon Mumtaz, Morten O. Ravn, and Helene Rey. Aggregation bias does explain the PPP puzzle. Discussion Paper 5237, CEPR, September 2005. [20] Jean Imbs, Haroon Mumtaz, Morten O. Ravn, and Helene Rey. PPP strikes back: Aggregation and the real exchange rate. Quarterly Journal of Economics, forthcoming, 2005. [21] Lutz Kilian and Mark P. Taylor. Why is it so di±cult to beat the random walk forecast of exchange rates? Journal of International Economics, 60:87{107, May 2003. [22] David E. Lebow and Jeremy B. Rudd. Measurement error in the consumer price index: Where do we stand? Finance and Economic Discussion Papers 61, The Federal Reserve Board, December 2001. [23] Johan Lyhagen. Why not use standard panel unit root tests for testing PPP. Working Papers Series in Economics and Finance 413, Stockholm School of Economics, Decem- ber 2000. [24] Dennis Novy. Is the iceberg melting less quickly? international trade costs after world war ii. University of Cambridge manuscript, July 2006. [25] Dennis Novy. Trade costs in a model of pricing-to-market. University of Cambridge manuscript, July 2006. [26] Maurice Obstfeld and Alan M. Taylor. Nonlinear aspects of goods-market arbitrage and adjustment: Heckschers commodity points revisited. Journal of the Japanese and International Economics, (11):441-479, 1997. [27] Paul G. J. O'Connel. The overvaluation of purchasing power parity. Journal of Inter- national Economics, 44:1-19, 1998. [28] David H. Papell. Searching for stationarity: Purchasing power parity under the current float. Journal of International Economics, (43):313-332, 1997. [29] Melissa A. A. Rodrigues, Maria Lucia A. Borges, Adriana S. Franca, Leandro S. Oliveira, and Paulo C. Correa. Evaluation of physical characteristics of coffee dur- ing roasting. Manuscript, December 2003. [30] Timo TerÄasvirta. Specification, estimation and evaluation of smooth transition au- toregressive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(425):208-218, March 1994. [31] Howell Tong. Non-linear Time Series: A Dynamic Systems Approach. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1990. [32] Ruey S. Tsay. Nonlinearity tests for time series. Biometrika, 73(2):461-466, August 1986. [33] Ruey S. Tsay. Testing and modeling threshold autoregressive processes. Journal of the American Statisctical Association, 84(405):231-240, March 1989. [34] Asaf Zussman. Limits to arbitrage: Trading frictions and deviations from purchasing power parity. Manuscript, December 2002. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/8606 |