Berka, Martin (2006): Non-linear adjustment in law of one price deviations and physical characteristics of goods. Forthcoming in: Review of International Economics
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_8606.pdf Download (307kB) | Preview |
Abstract
At a level of individual goods, heterogeneity of marginal transaction costs, proxied by price-to-weight ratios and stowage factors, explains a large part of the variation in thresholds of no-adjustment and conditional half-lives of law of one price deviations. Prices of heavier more voluminous) goods deviate further before becoming mean-reverting. Moreover, after becoming mean-reverting, prices of heavier goods converge more slowly. Together with measures of pricing power, market size, distance and exchange rate volatility, these factors explain up to 43% of variation in no-adjustment threshold estimates across 52 goods in US-Canada post Bretton Woods monthly CPI data and are robust in a broader 5-country dataset. They open two avenues for the importance of marginal transaction costs in accounting for real exchange rate persistence: through (a) generating persistence in individual real exchange rate components, and (b) accentuating it by the process of aggregation of heterogeneous components (”aggregation bias” of Imbs, et al. 2005).
| Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
|---|---|
| Institution: | Massey University, Department of Commerce |
| Original Title: | Non-linear adjustment in law of one price deviations and physical characteristics of goods |
| Language: | English |
| Keywords: | Law of One Price Deviations; Real Exchange Rate Persistence; Non-Linearities; transaction costs; Physical Weight; Physical Volume; Threshold Autregres-sive Models |
| Subjects: | F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F36 - Financial Aspects of Economic Integration F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F31 - Foreign Exchange |
| Item ID: | 8606 |
| Depositing User: | Prof Martin Berka |
| Date Deposited: | 06 May 2008 05:16 |
| Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 04:36 |
| References: | [1] American Automobile Manufacturers' Association. Motor Vehicles Facts and Figures. AAMA, Washington, D.C., 1996. [2] Anindya Banerjee, Massimiliano Marcellino, and Chiara Osbat. Some cautions on the use of panel methods for integrated series of macro-economic data. manuscript, July 2001. [3] Caroline Betts and Michael B. Devereux. Exchange rate dynamics in a model of pricing- to-market. Journal of International Economics, 50(1):215-244, February 2000. [4] Fabian Bornhorst. On the use of panel unit root tests on cross-sectionally dependent data: an application to PPP. Working Paper ECO 2003/24, European University Institute, November 2003. [5] Ariel Burstein, Joao C. Neves, and Sergio Rebelo. Distribution costs and real ex- change rate dynamics during exchange-rate-based stabilizations. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50:1189-1214, September 2003. [6] Shiu-Sheng Chen and Charles Engel. Does "aggregation bias" explain the PPP puzzle? Working Paper 10304, NBER, February 2004. [7] Mario Crucini, Chris Telmer, and Marios Zachariadis. Dispersion in real exchange rates. Mimeo, Vanderbilt University, Carnegie Mellon University, Ohio State Univer- sity, February 2000. [8] Mario Crucini, Chris Telmer, and Marios Zachariadis. Understanding European real exchange rates. American Economic Review, 95(3):724-738, June 2005. [9] James E. Ertel and Edward B. Fowlkes. Some algorithms for linear splines and piecewise linear regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71:640{648, 1976. [10] C.W.J. Granger and Timo TerÄasvirta. Modelling Nonlinear Economic Relationships. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993. [11] Michael Grossmann and Sarah Markowiz. Alcohol regulation and violence on college campuses. Working Paper 7129, NBER, May 1999. [12] Jonathan Gruber, Anindya Sen, and Mark Stabile. Estimating price elasticities when there is smuggling: the sensitivity of smoking to price in Canada. Working Paper 8962, NBER, May 2002. [13] Bruce Hansen. Inference in TAR models. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econo- metrics, 2(1):1-14, April 1997. [14] David Hummels. Have international transportation costs declined? University of Chicago, July 1999. [15] David Hummels. Time as a trade barrier. Purdue University, July 2001. [16] David Hummels. Towards a geography of trade costs. University of Chicago, September 2001. [17] David Hummels and Alexandre Skiba. Shipping the good apples out? An empirical confirmation of the Alchian-Allen conjecture. Journal of Political Economy, 112:1384{ 1402, 2004. [18] Jean Imbs, Haroon Mumtaz, Morten O. Ravn, and Helene Rey. Non linearites and real exchange rate dynamics. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(2-3):639- 649, April May 2003. [19] Jean Imbs, Haroon Mumtaz, Morten O. Ravn, and Helene Rey. Aggregation bias does explain the PPP puzzle. Discussion Paper 5237, CEPR, September 2005. [20] Jean Imbs, Haroon Mumtaz, Morten O. Ravn, and Helene Rey. PPP strikes back: Aggregation and the real exchange rate. Quarterly Journal of Economics, forthcoming, 2005. [21] Lutz Kilian and Mark P. Taylor. Why is it so di±cult to beat the random walk forecast of exchange rates? Journal of International Economics, 60:87{107, May 2003. [22] David E. Lebow and Jeremy B. Rudd. Measurement error in the consumer price index: Where do we stand? Finance and Economic Discussion Papers 61, The Federal Reserve Board, December 2001. [23] Johan Lyhagen. Why not use standard panel unit root tests for testing PPP. Working Papers Series in Economics and Finance 413, Stockholm School of Economics, Decem- ber 2000. [24] Dennis Novy. Is the iceberg melting less quickly? international trade costs after world war ii. University of Cambridge manuscript, July 2006. [25] Dennis Novy. Trade costs in a model of pricing-to-market. University of Cambridge manuscript, July 2006. [26] Maurice Obstfeld and Alan M. Taylor. Nonlinear aspects of goods-market arbitrage and adjustment: Heckschers commodity points revisited. Journal of the Japanese and International Economics, (11):441-479, 1997. [27] Paul G. J. O'Connel. The overvaluation of purchasing power parity. Journal of Inter- national Economics, 44:1-19, 1998. [28] David H. Papell. Searching for stationarity: Purchasing power parity under the current float. Journal of International Economics, (43):313-332, 1997. [29] Melissa A. A. Rodrigues, Maria Lucia A. Borges, Adriana S. Franca, Leandro S. Oliveira, and Paulo C. Correa. Evaluation of physical characteristics of coffee dur- ing roasting. Manuscript, December 2003. [30] Timo TerÄasvirta. Specification, estimation and evaluation of smooth transition au- toregressive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(425):208-218, March 1994. [31] Howell Tong. Non-linear Time Series: A Dynamic Systems Approach. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1990. [32] Ruey S. Tsay. Nonlinearity tests for time series. Biometrika, 73(2):461-466, August 1986. [33] Ruey S. Tsay. Testing and modeling threshold autoregressive processes. Journal of the American Statisctical Association, 84(405):231-240, March 1989. [34] Asaf Zussman. Limits to arbitrage: Trading frictions and deviations from purchasing power parity. Manuscript, December 2002. |
| URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/8606 |

