Development as a ‘Norms-Rights Transition Process’ Through Public Action

Pillai N., Vijayamohanan (2003): Development as a ‘Norms-Rights Transition Process’ Through Public Action.

Abstract

The present paper has constituted the background source for a number of studies; it sets out to build up an interpretation of the conception of poverty in its multidimensional existence within the framework of human rights, human development and decentralization. Here we discuss the various implications of the links and linkages among human rights, freedom and development to develop a theoretical framework. Within this, we start from the original conception of poverty in terms of minimum rights to resources, by which people are seen as entitled, as citizens, to a minimum income. This is then extended to the comprehensive conception of development as freedom, a la AK Sen, approaching poverty in terms of right to freedom. We argue that political freedom has substantial linkages towards social and economic freedom, all together constituting development, seen as ‘removal of major sources of unfreedom’ of both income and non-income dimensions. In the hard core constitution of development/poverty, seen in terms of the most basic human right to life, the former (income dimension) specifies the right to resources, and thus to employment guarantee, while the latter signifies the right to building up human capital by means especially of health and education. Here we delineate the dynamic sequence of development as entitlement → access → freedom. This highlights the significance of the role of the state in opening up opportunities, that is, creating capabilities. Here individual freedom is taken up as a social commitment. we argue that community participation in development process through decentralisation of state power and functionings constitutes an autonomous and hence ideal means of targeting and tackling development issues through co-operatives. This in turn implies that the degree of decentralisation of power of a state is an indicator of its concern for and commitment to human development. This all the more becomes pertinent in the context of liberalisation drives by a state in its teleological transformation of role reduction. And the liberalisation drives by the concerned state thus imply a human rights violation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Development, human rights, poverty, freedom, decentralization, entitlement, access
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O15 - Human Resources ; Human Development ; Income Distribution ; Migration

References

1. Amar, Akhil Reed (1998) The Bill of Rights. New Haven: Yale U.P.

2. Beetham, D. (1995) "Human Rights and Political Theory: What Future for Economic and Social Rights?” Political Studies, 43 (Special Issue), 41-60

3. Berlin, Isaiah (1969). ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’ in his Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 118-72.

4. Beveridge, William (1944). Full Employment in a Free Society. London: Allen and Unwin.

5. Cranston, Maurice (1967) “Human Rights: Real and Supposed,” in D.D. Raphael, ed., Political Theory and the Rights of Man. Bloomington, IN: Indiana U.P., pp. 43-51

6. Cranston, Maurice (1967). ‘Liberalism’ in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Paul Edwards, ed. New York: Macmillan and the Free Press: 458-461.

7. Cranston, M. (1973) What Are Human Rights? London: Bodley Head

8. Christman, J. (1991) ‘Liberalism and Individual Positive Freedom’, Ethics, 101, pp. 343-59.

9. Dasgupta, P. (1993) An Inquiry into Wellbeing and Destitution. Oxford: Clrendon Press.

10. Dreze, Jean and Sen, AK. (1995) India: Economic Development and Social Opportunity. Delhi/Oxford: OUP.

11. Feinberg, J. (1973) Social Philosophy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

12. Freeden, Michael (1978). The New Liberalism: An Ideology of Social Reform. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

13. Galbraith, JK (1998) Created Unequal: The Crisis in American Pay. New York: The Free Press.

14. Gaus, Gerald F. (1983a). The Modern Liberal Theory of Man. New York: St. Martin's Press.

15. Gaus, Gerald F. (1983b). ‘Public and Private Interests in Liberal Political Economy, Old and New’ in Public and Private in Social Life, S.I. Benn and G.F. Gaus, eds. New York: St. Martin's Press: 183-221.

16. Gibbs, B. (1976), Freedom and Liberation, London: Chatto and Windus.

17. Griffin, J. (2001) ‘First Steps in an Account of Human Rights.’ European Journal of Philosophy 9: 306-327

18. Kannan, KP and Pillai, N. Vijayamohanan (2005) ‘Public Action as Participatory Development: Kerala Experience Reinterpreted’ in Prof. Arjun K. Sengupta (Ed.) Reflections on the Right to Development, Centre for Development and Human Rights, New Delhi, Sage Publications, New Delhi: 208-242.

19. Kannan, KP and Pillai, N. Vijayamohanan (2007) ‘Conceptualizing Social Security in a Human Development and Rights Perspective’ Indian Journal of Human Development Vol. 1, No. 1; January; pp. 31 – 51.

20. Kannan, KP and Pillai, N. Vijayamohanan (2009) ‘Basic Socio-Economic Security in Rural India and China: A Comparative Study of Selected Villages’, Indian Journal of Human Development. Vol. 3, No. 2, July - December, pages 239-263.

21. Kant, Immanuel, (1965 [1797]). The Metaphysical Elements of Justice, John Ladd, trans. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

22. Locke, John (1975 [1690]). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Peter H. Nidditch, ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press.

23. Marshall, T.M. (1965) Class, Citizenship, and Social Development. Garden City, NY: Anchor.

24. Macpherson, C. B. (1973) Berlin's Division of Liberty, in C. B. Macpherson, Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

25. Miller, D. (1983) ‘Constraints on Freedom’, Ethics, 94, pp. 66-86.

26. Milne, A. J. M. (1968) Freedom and Rights, London: George Allen and Unwin.

27. Nozick, R. (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia, New York: Basic Books.

28. O’Connor, J. (1973) The Fiscal Crisis of the State. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

29. Oppenheim, F. E.(1981) Political Conceps: A Reconstruction, Oxford, Blackwell.

30. Pillai, N. Vijayamohanan (2004a) Governance and Human Development: Experiences of Kerala: Meant as a background chapter for Kerala Human Development Report 2005. Centre for development Studies, Trivandrum.

31. Pillai, N. Vijayamohanan (2004b) Infrastructure and Human Development in Kerala: Meant as a background chapter for Kerala Human Development Report 2005. Centre for development Studies, Trivandrum.

32. Pillai, N. Vijayamohanan (2005) Poverty Reduction through Social Security in Kerala: Meant as a background chapter for Kerala Human Development Report 2005. Centre for development Studies, Trivandrum.

33. Rawls, John. (2001) Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U.P.

34. Rudra, Ashok (1995) ‘The Basic Needs Concept and Its Implementation in Indian Development Planning’ in Cameron, John, et al. (ed.) (1995) Poverty and Power: The Role of Institutions and the Market in Development. Delhi: OUP.

35. Seers, Dudley (1969) ‘The Meaning of Development’ in Lehman, D. (ed.) (1979) Development Theory. London: Cass.

36. Sen, A., (1985) ‘Well-being, Agency and Freedom’, Journal of Philosophy, 82: 169-221.

37. Sen, AK. (1988) ‘Freedom and Choice: Concept and Content’, European Economic Review, (Papers and Proceedings), 32.

38. Sen, A., (1992), Inequality Reexamined, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

39. Sen, AK.(1999a) Development as Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.

40. Sen, AK (1999b) ‘Human Rights and Economic Achievements’ in Bauer, JR and Bell, DA (ed.) The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights. Cambridge: CUP.

41. Sen, AK (2000) ‘Consequential Evaluations and Practical Reason’, Journal of Philosophy, XCVII (9).

42. Sen, A., (2002) Rationality and Freedom, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

43. Sen, AK and Wolfensohn, JD. (1999) “Development: a coin with two sides”, The Hindu, 6 May 1999

44. Stephens, JD. (1979) The Transition from capitalism to Socialism. London: Macmillan.

45. Steiner, H. (1994) An Essay on Rights, Oxford: Blackwell.

46. Streeten, Paul (1994) ‘Human Development: Means and Ends.’ American Economic Review 84 (May): 232–37.

47. Sunstein, Cass (2001) Designing Democracy. New York: Oxford U.P.

48. Taylor, C. (1979) ‘What's Wrong with Negative Liberty’, in A. Ryan (ed.), The Idea of Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press, reprinted in Miller 1991.

49. Therborn, G. (1984 ) ‘The Prospects of Labour and the Transformation of Advanced Capitalism’, New Left Review 145, May-June: 5 – 38.

50. Waldron, Jeremy (1993) Liberal Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.

51. Wellman, Carl (1999) The Proliferation of Rights: Moral Progress or Empty Rhetoric? Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

52. Wolfensohn, James (1999) A Proposal for a Comprehensive Development Framework. Washington DC: World Bank. Processed.

53. U N (1999) Independent expert’s Report

54. UNDP (1990) The Human Development Report 1990: Definition and Measurement of Human Development. Paris: Economica.

55. UNDP (2000) Human Development Report 2000. Oxford: OUP.