Digit ratio (2D:4D) predicts pro-social behavior in economic games only for unsatisfied individuals

Brañas-Garza, Pablo and Espín, Antonio M. and Garcia, Teresa and Kovářík, Jaromír (2018): Digit ratio (2D:4D) predicts pro-social behavior in economic games only for unsatisfied individuals.

Abstract

Prenatal exposure to hormones, and to sex hormones in particular, exerts organizational effects on the brain and these have observable behavioral correlates in adult life. There are reasons to expect that social behaviors—which are fundamental for the evolutionary success of humans—might be related to biological factors such as prenatal sex hormone exposure. Nevertheless, the existing literature is inconclusive as to whether and how prenatal exposure to testosterone and estrogen, proxied by the second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D:4D), may predict non-selfish behavior. Here, we investigate this question using economic experiments with real monetary stakes and analyzing five different dimensions of social behavior in a comparatively large sample of Caucasian participants (n=560). For both males and females, our results show no robust association between right- or left-hand 2D:4D and generosity, bargaining, or trust-related behaviors. Since 2D:4D is thought to be a marker for status, we set-up and test the hypothesis that 2D:4D explains prosocial behavior only for people with low subjective wellbeing who are in need for status. Using two different measures of subjective wellbeing, we find considerable support for our hypothesis, especially among males. These results contribute to the debate regarding the context-dependent interpretation of the effect of prenatal hormone exposure on behavior by suggesting that important moderating factors may explain the differing results in the literature. In particular, we uncover the importance of accounting for the subjective nature of need for status, which has been largely overlooked in previous work.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Social Preferences, Economic Games, Digit Ratio, Life Satisfaction
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D64 - Altruism ; Philanthropy

References

Abeler, J., & Nosenzo, D. (2015). Self-selection into laboratory experiments: pro-social motives versus monetary incentives. Experimental Economics, 18(2), 195-214.

Allaway, H.C., Bloski, T.G., Pierson, R.A., & Lujan, M.E. (2009). Digit ratios (2D:4D) determined by computer-assisted analysis are more reliable than those using physical measurements, photocopies, and printed scans.American Journal of Human Biology; 21: 365–370.

Al-Ubaydli, O., Jones, G., & Weel, J. (2016). Average player traits as predictors of cooperation in a repeated prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 64, 50-60.

Amin, Z., Canli, T., & Epperson, C. N. (2005). Effect of estrogen-serotonin interactions on mood and cognition. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 4(1), 43-58.

Anderson, C., Kraus, M. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Keltner, D. (2012). The local-ladder effect: Social status and subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 23(7), 764-771.

Appel, H., Gerlach, A. L., & Crusius, J. (2016). The interplay between Facebook use, social comparison, envy, and depression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9, 44-49.

Ashraf, N., Bohnet, I., & Piankov, N. (2006). Decomposing trust and trustworthiness. Experimental Economics, 9(3), 193-208.

Auger, J., Le Denmat, D., Berges, R., Doridot, L., Salmon, B., Canivenc-Lavier, M. C., & Eustache, F. (2013). Environmental levels of oestrogenic and antiandrogenic compounds feminize digit ratios in male rats and their unexposed male progeny. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 280(1768), 20131532.

Auyeung, B., Baron-Cohen, S., Ashwin, E., Knickmeyer, R., Taylor, K., Hackett, G., & Hines, M. (2009). Fetal testosterone predicts sexually differentiated childhood behavior in girls and in boys. Psychological Science, 20(2), 144-148.

Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211(4489), 1390-1396.

Aycinena, D., Baltaduonis, R., & Rentschler, L. (2014). Risk preferences and prenatal exposure to sex hormones for ladinos. PLoS ONE, 9(8), e103332.

Baron-Cohen, S., Knickmeyer, R. C., & Belmonte, M. K. (2005). Sex differences in the brain: implications for explaining autism. Science, 310(5749), 819-823.

Bartels M, Van den Berg SM, Sluyter F, Boomsma DI, de Geus EJC (2003) Heritability of cortisol levels: Review and simultaneous analysis of twin studies. Psychoneuroendocrinology 28:121–137.

Barrett-Connor, E., von Mühlen, D. G., & Kritz-Silverstein, D. (1999). Bioavailable testosterone and depressed mood in older men: the Rancho Bernardo Study.The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 84(2), 573-577.

Berenbaum, S. A., & Beltz, A. M. (2011). Sexual differentiation of human behavior: effects of prenatal and pubertal organizational hormones. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 32(2), 183-200.

Bohnet, I., & Zeckhauser, R. (2004). Trust, risk and betrayal. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4), 467-484.

Bos, P. A., Terburg, D., & Van Honk, J. (2010). Testosterone decreases trust in socially naive humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(22), 9991-9995.

Bosch-Domènech, A., Brañas-Garza, P., & Espín, A. M. (2014). Can exposure to prenatal sex hormones (2D: 4D) predict cognitive reflection? Psychoneuroendocrinology, 43, 1-10.

Branas-Garza, P., Galizzi, M., & Nieboer, J. (in press). Experimental and self-reported measures of risk taking and digit ratio (2D: 4D): evidence from a large, systematic study. International Economic Review,

Branas-Garza, P., & Kovářík, J. (2013). Digit Ratios and Social Preferences: a Comment on Buser (2012), Chapman University Working Paper 13-31.

Branas-Garza, P., Kovářík, J., & Neyse, L. (2013). Second-to-fourth digit ratio has a non-monotonic impact on altruism. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e60419. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12299

Branas-Garza, P., Meloso, D. & Miller, L. (2017). Strategic risk and response time across games. International Journal of Game Theory 46(2): 511-523.

Brañas-Garza, P., & Rustichini, A. (2011). Organizing effects of testosterone and economic behavior: Not just risk taking. PLoS ONE, 6(12), e29842.

Burks, S. V., Carpenter, J. P., Goette, L., & Rustichini, A. (2009). Cognitive skills affect economic preferences, strategic behavior, and job attachment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(19), 7745-7750.

Burnham, T. C. (2007). High-testosterone men reject low ultimatum game offers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274(1623), 2327-2330.

Buser, T. (2012). Digit ratios, the menstrual cycle and social preferences. Games and Economic Behavior, 76(2), 457-470.

Buskens, V., Raub, W., Van Miltenburg, N., Montoya, E. R., & Van Honk, J. (2016). Testosterone administration moderates effect of social environment on Trust in Women Depending on second-to-fourth digit ratio. Scientific Reports, 6, 27655.

Cabrales, A., Espín, A. M., Kujal, P., & Rassenti, S. (2017). Humans' (incorrect) distrust of reflective decisions. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2945364.

Capraro, V., Corgnet, B., Espín, A. M., & Hernán-González, R. (2017). Deliberation favours social efficiency by making people disregard their relative shares: evidence from USA and India. Royal Society Open Science, 4(2), 160605.

Cecchi F., Duchoslav, J. (2018). The Effect of Prenatal Stress on Cooperation: Evidence from Violent Conflict in Uganda, European Economic Review, 101: 35-56.

Cesarini, D., Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., Johannesson, M., Lichtenstein, P., & Wallace, B. (2008). Heritability of cooperative behavior in the trust game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(10), 3721-3726.

Cesarini, D., Dawes, C. T., Johannesson, M., Lichtenstein, P., & Wallace, B. (2009). Genetic variation in preferences for giving and risk taking. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(2), 809-842.

Charness, G., & Grosskopf, B. (2001). Relative payoffs and happiness: an experimental study. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 45(3), 301-328.

Chen, C., Decety, J., Huang, P. C., Chen, C. Y., & Cheng, Y. (2016). Testosterone administration in females modulates moral judgment and patterns of brain activation and functional connectivity. Human Brain Mapping, 37(10), 3417-3430.

Cohen-Bendahan, C. C., Van de Beek, C., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2005). Prenatal sex hormone effects on child and adult sex-typed behavior: methods and findings. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 29(2), 353-384.

Corgnet, B., Espín, A. M., & Hernán-González, R. (2015). The cognitive basis of social behavior: cognitive reflection overrides antisocial but not always prosocial motives. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 287.

Corgnet, B., Espín, A. M., Hernán-González, R., Kujal, P., & Rassenti, S. (2016). To trust, or not to trust: cognitive reflection in trust games. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 64, 20-27.

Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448-74.

Cueva, C., Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I., Mata-Pérez, E., Ponti, G., Sartarelli, M., Yu, H., & Zhukova, V. (2016). Cognitive (ir) reflection: New experimental evidence. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 64, 81-93.

Davis, E. P., & Sandman, C. A. (2010). The timing of prenatal exposure to maternal cortisol and psychosocial stress is associated with human infant cognitive development. Child Development, 81(1), 131-148.

De Neys, W., Hopfensitz, A., & Bonnefon, J. F. (2013). Low second-to-fourth digit ratio predicts indiscriminate social suspicion, not improved trustworthiness detection. Biology Letters, 9(2), 20130037.

Ebstein, R. P., Israel, S., Chew, S. H., Zhong, S., & Knafo, A. (2010). Genetics of human social behavior. Neuron, 65(6), 831-844.

Eisenegger, C., Haushofer, J., & Fehr, E. (2011). The role of testosterone in social interaction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(6), 263-271.

Eisenegger, C., Naef, M., Snozzi, R., Heinrichs, M., & Fehr, E. (2010). Prejudice and truth about the effect of testosterone on human bargaining behaviour. Nature 463, 356– 359.

Ermisch, J., Gambetta, D., Laurie, H., Siedler, T., & Noah Uhrig, S. C. (2009). Measuring people's trust. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 172(4), 749- 769.

Espín, A. M., Exadaktylos, F., & Neyse, L. (2016a). Heterogeneous motives in the trust game: a tale of two roles. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 728.

Espín, A. M., Moreno-Herrero, D., Sánchez-Campillo, J., & Martín-Rodríguez, J. A. (2016b). Do envy and compassion pave the way to unhappiness? Social preferences and life satisfaction in a Spanish city. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1-27.

Espinosa, M. P., & Kovářík, J. (2015). Prosocial behavior and gender. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 88.

Extremera, N., Durán, A., & Rey, L. (2009). The moderating effect of trait meta-mood and perceived stress on life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(2), 116-121.

Extremera, N., & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2005). Perceived emotional intelligence and life satisfaction: Predictive and incremental validity using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(5), 937-948.

Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425(6960), 785.

Felwah S. Al-Zaid, AbdelFattah A. Alhader, Laila Y. AL-Ayadhi (2015). The second to fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) in Saudi boys with autism: A potential screening tool, Early Human Development 91(7), 413-415.

Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25-42.

Fries, A. B. W., Ziegler, T. E., Kurian, J. R., Jacoris, S., & Pollak, S. D. (2005). Early experience in humans is associated with changes in neuropeptides critical for regulating social behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(47), 17237-17240.

Gächter, S., Herrmann, B., & Thöni, C. (2004). Trust, voluntary cooperation, and socio- economic background: survey and experimental evidence.Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4), 505-531.

Galizzi, M. M., & Nieboer, J. (2015). Digit ratio (2D: 4D) and altruism: evidence from a large, multi-ethnic sample. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9.

Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(4), 367-388.

Harris JA, Vernon PA, Boomsma DI (1998) The heritability of testosterone: A study of Dutch adolescent twins and their parents. Behavioural Genetics 28:165–171.

Holm, H. J., & Danielson, A. (2005). Tropic trust versus Nordic trust: experimental evidence from Tanzania and Sweden. The Economic Journal, 115(503), 505-532.

Kemper, C.J. and Schwerdtfeger, A. Comparing indirect methods of digit ratio (2D:4D) measurement. American Journal of Human Biology 2009; 21: 188–191

Knickmeyer, R., Baron-Cohen, S., Raggatt, P., & Taylor, K. (2005). Foetal testosterone, social relationships, and restricted interests in children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(2), 198-210.

Konow, J., & Earley, J. (2008). The hedonistic paradox: Is homo economicus happier?. Journal of Public Economics, 92(1), 1-33.

Kovářík, J., Brañas-Garza, P., Davidson, M. W., Haim, D. A., Carcelli, S., & Fowler, J. H. (2017). Digit ratio (2D: 4D) and social integration: An effect of prenatal sex hormones. Network Science, 5(4), 476-489.

Kuppens, P., Realo, A., & Diener, E. (2008). The role of positive and negative emotions in life satisfaction judgment across nations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 66.

Lane, T. (2017). How does happiness relate to economic behaviour? A review of the literature. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 68, 62-78.

Lin, N. (1999). Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 467-487.

Lombardo, M. V., Ashwin, E., Auyeung, B., Chakrabarti, B., Lai, M. C., Taylor, K., ... & Baron-Cohen, S. (2012). Fetal programming effects of testosterone on the reward system and behavioral approach tendencies in humans. Biological Psychiatry, 72(10), 839-847.

Lutchmaya, S., Baron-Cohen, S., Raggatt, P., Knickmeyer, R., & Manning, J. T. (2004). 2nd to 4th digit ratios, fetal testosterone and estradiol.Early Human Development, 77(1), 23-28.

Lyubomirsky, S., & Ross, L. (1997). Hedonic consequences of social comparison: a contrast of happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1141.

Manning J. T. (2002). Digit ratio: A Pointer to Fertility, Behavior, and Health. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Manning, J. T., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & Sanders, G. (2001). The 2nd to 4th digit ratio and autism. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 43(3), 160- 164.

Manning, J. T., Churchill, A. J., & Peters, M. (2007). The effects of sex, ethnicity, and sexual orientation on self-measured digit ratio (2D: 4D).Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(2), 223-233.

Manning, J.T. & Fink, B., 2008. Digit ratio (2D:4D), dominance, reproductive success, asymmetry, and sociosexuality in the BBC Internet Study. American Journal of Human Biology, (20), pp.451-461.

Manning, J., Kilduff, L., Cook, C., Crewther, B., & Fink, B. (2014). Digit ratio (2D: 4D): a biomarker for prenatal sex steroids and adult sex steroids in challenge situations. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 5, 9.

Mazur A., & Booth, A. (1998). Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(3), 353-363.

Millet, K. (2011). An interactionist perspective on the relation between 2D: 4D and behavior: An overview of (moderated) relationships between 2D: 4D and economic decision making. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 397-401.

Millet, K., & Buehler, F. (2018). A Context Dependent Interpretation of Inconsistencies in 2D: 4D findings: The moderating role of status relevance. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 11, 254.

Millet, K., & Dewitte, S. (2006). Second to fourth digit ratio and cooperative behavior. Biological Psychology, 71(1), 111-115.

Millet, K., & Dewitte, S. (2007). Digit ratio (2D: 4D) moderates the impact of an aggressive music video on aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(2), 289-294.

Millet, K., & Dewitte, S. (2009). The presence of aggression cues inverts the relation between digit ratio (2D: 4D) and prosocial behaviour in a dictator game. British Journal of Psychology, 100(1), 151-162

Morelli, S. A., Ong, D. C., Makati, R., Jackson, M. O., & Zaki, J. (2017). Empathy and well-being correlate with centrality in different social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(37), 9843-9847.

Neyse, L. & Brañas-Garza, P. (2014): Digit Ratio Measurement Guide. Munich Repository 54134.

Nowak, M. A. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314(5805), 1560-1563.

O'Connor, P. J., Morgan, W. P., Raglin, J. S., Barksdale, C. M., & Kalin, N. H. (1989). Mood state and salivary cortisol levels following overtraining in female swimmers. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 14(4), 303-310.

Owens, M. J., & Nemeroff, C. B. (1994). Role of serotonin in the pathophysiology of depression: focus on the serotonin transporter. Clinical Chemistry, 40(2), 288-295.

Pope, H. G., Kouri, E. M., & Hudson, J. I. (2000). Effects of supraphysiologic doses of testosterone on mood and aggression in normal men: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 57(2), 133-140.

Repetti, R. L., Taylor, S. E., & Seeman, T. E. (2002). Risky families: family social environments and the mental and physical health of offspring.Psychological Bulletin, 128(2), 330.

Romano, M., Rubolini, D., Martinelli, R., Alquati, A. B., & Saino, N. (2005). Experimental manipulation of yolk testosterone affects digit length ratios in the ring- necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus). Hormones and Behavior, 48(3), 342-346.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141-166.

Ryckmans, J., Millet, K., & Warlop, L. (2015). The influence of facial characteristics on the relation between male 2D: 4D and dominance. PLoS ONE, 10(11), e0143307.

Sanchez-Pages, S., & Turiegano, E. (2010). Testosterone, facial symmetry and cooperation in the prisoners' dilemma. Physiology & Behavior, 99(3), 355-361.

Sánchez-Pagés, S., & Turiegano, E. (2013). Two studies on the interplay between social preferences and individual biological features. Behaviour, 150(7), 713-735.

Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45(3), 513.

Schwarz, N., Strack, F., Kommer, D., & Wagner, D. (1987). Soccer, rooms, and the quality of your life: Mood effects on judgments of satisfaction with life in general and with specific domains. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17(1), 69-79.

Sirgy, M. J. (2012). The psychology of quality of life: Hedonic well-being, life satisfaction, and eudaimonia (Vol. 50). Springer Science & Business Media.

Smyth, J., Ockenfels, M. C., Porter, L., Kirschbaum, C., Hellhammer, D. H., & Stone, A. A. (1998). Stressors and mood measured on a momentary basis are associated with salivary cortisol secretion. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23(4), 353-370.

Suh, E., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Triandis, H. C. (1998). The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 482.

Talarovičová, A., Kršková, L., & Blažeková, J. (2009). Testosterone enhancement during pregnancy influences the 2D: 4D ratio and open field motor activity of rat siblings in adulthood. Hormones and Behavior, 55(1), 235-239.

Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2002). Self-esteem and socioeconomic status: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(1), 59-71.

Van den Bergh, B., & Dewitte, S. (2006). Digit ratio (2D: 4D) moderates the impact of sexual cues on men's decisions in ultimatum games. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 273(1597), 2091-2095.

Van Eck, M., Berkhof, H., Nicolson, N., & Sulon, J. (1996). The effects of perceived stress, traits, mood states, and stressful daily events on salivary cortisol. Psychosomatic Medicine, 58(5), 447-458.

Van Honk, J., Montoya, E. R., Bos, P. A., Van Vugt, M., & Terburg, D. (2012). New evidence on testosterone and cooperation. Nature, 485(7399), E4.

Van Lange, P. A., De Bruin, E., Otten, W., & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 733.

Verduyn, P., Lee, D. S., Park, J., Shablack, H., Orvell, A., Bayer, J., ... & Kross, E. (2015). Passive Facebook usage undermines affective well-being: Experimental and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(2), 480.

Wallace, B., Cesarini, D., Lichtenstein, P., & Johannesson, M. (2007). Heritability of ultimatum game responder behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(40), 15631-15634.

Wingfield, J. C., Maney, D. L., Breuner, C. W., Jacobs, J. D., Lynn, S., Ramenofsky, M., & Richardson, R. D. (1998). Ecological bases of hormone—behavior interactions: the “emergency life history stage”. American Zoologist, 38(1), 191-206.

Zak, P. J., Kurzban, R., Ahmadi, S., Swerdloff, R. S., Park, J., Efremidze, L., ... & Matzner, W. (2009). Testosterone administration decreases generosity in the ultimatum game. PLoS ONE, 4(12), e8330.

Zethraeus, N., Kocoska-Maras, L., Ellingsen, T., Von Schoultz, B. O., Hirschberg, A. L., & Johannesson, M. (2009). A randomized trial of the effect of estrogen and testosterone on economic behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(16), 6535-6538.

Zheng, Z. & Cohn, M.J., 2011. Developmental basis of sexually dimorphic digit ratios. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, pp.1628916294.

Zilioli, S., Imami, L., & Slatcher, R. B. (2015). Life satisfaction moderates the impact of socioeconomic status on diurnal cortisol slope. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 60, 91- 95.