Communities of Practice and Virtual Learning Communities: Benefits, barriers and success factors

Fontainha, Elsa and Gannon-Leary, Pat (2008): Communities of Practice and Virtual Learning Communities: Benefits, barriers and success factors. Published in: eLearning Papers No. Special edition 2008 (2008): pp. 20-29.

Abstract

A virtual Community of Practice (CoP) is a network of individuals who share a domain of interest about which they communicate online. The practitioners share resources (for example experiences, problems and solutions, tools, methodologies). Such communication results in the improvement of the knowledge of each participant in the community and contributes to the development of the knowledge within the domain. A virtual learning community may involve the conduct of original research but it is more likely that its main purpose is to increase the knowledge of participants, via formal education or professional development. Virtual learning communities could have learning as their main goal or the elearning could be generated as a side effect. Virtual communities of practice (CoPs) and virtual learning communities are becoming widespread within higher education institutions (HEIs) thanks to technological developments which enable increased communication, interactivity among participants and incorporation of collaborative pedagogical models, specifically through information communications technologies (ICTs) They afford the potential for the combination of synchronous and asynchronous communication, access to -and from- geographically isolated communities and international information sharing. Clearly there are benefits to be derived from sharing and learning within and out with HEIs. There is a sense of connectedness, of shared passion and a deepening of knowledge to be derived from ongoing interaction. Knowledge development can be continuous, cyclical and fluid. However, barriers exist in virtual CoPs and these are defined by the authors and illustrated with quotes from academic staff who have been involved in CoPs.Critical success factors (CSFs) for a virtual CoP are discussed. These include usability of technology; trust in, and acceptance of, ICTs in communication; a sense of belonging among members; paying attention to cross-national and cross-cultural dimensions of the CoP; shared understandings; a common sense of purpose; use of netiquette and user-friendly language and longevity. The authors recognise the enormous potential for the development of CoPs through e-mail discussion lists and discussion boards but have themselves experienced the difficulties inherent in initiating such a community. These are corroborated and illustrated with text from interviews with academic staff. Much of the literature on CoPs emanates from outside Europe, despite the fact that e-learning articles have a large diffusion around Europe. The authors suggest further exploration of this topic by identifying and studying CoPs and virtual learning communities across EU countries.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Communities of practice; collaborative; informal learning; interactivity; usability; e-learning
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A20 - General; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification

References

Alfaro, J. et al (2006) Understanding Change, Adapting to Change, Shaping the Future, Change Drivers, Trends & Core Tensions for European Learning Systems & Educational Policies, Learning in Europe; Observatory on National and International Evolution, LEONIE Project, retrieved June 14 from http://www.education-observatories.net/leonie/outputs/LEONIE_Executive_Summary_2006.pdf

Anderson, R. H. et al.: (1995), Universal Access to E-mail-Feasibility and Societal Implications, RAND Report MR-650-MF, retrieved June 6, 2007 from from http://www.rand.org:80/publications/MR/MR650/

Andrews T. & Schwarz G. (2002) Preparing students for the virtual organisation: an evaluation of learning with virtual learning technologies. Educational Technology and Society 5(3), 54–65.

Andrusyszyn M., Iwasiw C. & Goldenberg D. (1999) Computer conferencing in graduate nursing education: perceptions of students and faculty. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 30(6), 272–278.

Bos, N., Zimmerman, A., Olson, J., Yew, J., Yerkie, J., Dahl, E., et al. (2007). From shared databases to communities of practice: A taxonomy of collaboratories. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), article 16. retrieved June 6, 2007 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue2/bos.html

Broady-Preston, J., Felice, J. and Marshall, S. (2006) Building better cutomer relationships: case studies from Malta and the UK. Library management, 27 (6/7), 430-445

Broady-Preston, J and Felice, J. (2006) Customers, relationships and libraries: University of Malta – a case study. ASLIB proceedings, 58 (6), 525-536.

Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P. (2002) The social life of information. Boston : Harvard Business School Press.

Brown, J.S., Collins, A. & Duguid, S. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42

Campbell, M. & Uys, P. (2007) Identifying success factors of ICT in developing a learning community: Case study Charles Sturt University Campus-Wide Information Systems, 24 (1) 17-26.

Chavis, D.M., Hogge, J., McMillan, D. & Wandersman, A. (1986), Sense of community through Brunswick’s lens: a first look, Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 24-40.

Ciolek, T.M. ed. (2000) “The Internet in 2000: Opportunities and Disadvantages to Scholarly Work (results of an online brainstorming session)” History Education Forum (HEF) 7 Dec p. 1-16, Dept of History, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, retrieved June 6, 2007 from www.ciolek.com/PAPERS/brainstorm-mar00.html

Commission of the European Communities (2003) eLearning: Designing tomorrow’s education. Mid-term report SEC (2003) 905 retrieved June 14, 2007 from http://ec.europa.eu/education/programmes/elearning/doc/mid_term_report_en.pdf

Commission of the European Communities (2006) i2010 - First annual report on the European information society {COM(2006)215} retrieved June 14, 2007 from http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/i2010/docs/annual_report/2006/sec_2006_604_en.pdf

Cramton, C. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12, 346–371. . Cummings, J., & Kiesler, S. (2005). Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Social Studies of Science, retrieved June 6, 2007 from http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~kiesler/publications/PDFs/CummingsKieslerWeb0305.pdf

Ellis, D., Oldridge, R. and Vasconcelos, A. (2004), Community and virtual community , Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38,145–186

Eraut, M. (2003) Editorial. Learning in Health and Social Care. 2 (3), 117-122.

European Commission (2007) The European Research Area: New Perspectives - Green Paper. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, retrieved August 7, 2007 from http://ec.europa.eu/research/era/pdf/era-greenpaper_en.pdf

Fowler, C. & Mayes, J. (1999) Learning relationships from theory to design. Association for Learning Technology Journal. 7 (3), 6-16

Fox, S. (2000) Communities of Practice, Foucault and Actor-Network Theory. Journal of Management Studies. 37 (6), 853-867

Fox, S. (2000) An actor-network critique of community in higher education: implications for networked learning. Studies in Higher Education, 30 (1) 95-110

Gannon-Leary, P. (1998) The ethics of electronic mail. IRISS International Conference, Bristol UK, retrieved Aug 6, 2007 from http://www.intute.ac.uk/socialsciences/archive/iriss/papers/paper11.htm

Gannon-Leary, P (1999) . The ethics of email. In Pourciau, L.J. (Ed.), Ethics and Electronic Information in the 21st Century. Indiana: Purdue U.P., 165-190

Geibert, R. (2000) Integrating Web-based instruction into a graduate nursing program taught via videoconferencing. Challenges and solutions. Computers in Nursing 18(1), 26–34.

Gibson, C.B. & Manuel, J.A. (2003), Building trust: effective multicultural communication processes in virtual teams, In Gibson, C.B. & Cohen, S.G. (Eds.), Virtual Teams that Work. San Francisco, CA: Wiley & Sons, 59-86.

Gillis, A. Jackson, W. Braid, A. MacDonald, P. & MacQuarrie, M. (2000) The learning needs and experiences of women using print-based and CD-ROM technology in nursing distance education. Journal of Distance Education. 15(1), 1-20

Hinds, P.J. & Wesiband, S.P. (2003), Knowledge sharing and shared understanding in virtual teams, In Gibson, C.B. & Cohen, S.G. (Eds.), Virtual Teams that Work. San Francisco, CA: Wiley & Sons 21-36

Hlapanis, G. & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2007) The school-teacher’s learning community: matters of communication analysis. Technology Pedagogy and Education 16 (2) 133-152

Hollingshead, A. B. (1998). Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 659–671

Hong K.-S., Lai K.-W. & Holton D. (2003) Students’ satisfaction and perceived learning within a web-based course. Educational Technology and Society 6(1), 116–124.

Jarvenpaa, S., & Leidner, D. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791–815.

Johnson, C. M. (2001). A survey of current research on online communities of practice. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(1), 45-60.

Kelly, P., Gale, K., Wheeler, S. & Tucker, V. (2007) Taking a stance: promoting deliberate action through online postgraduate professional development. Technology Pedagogy and Education 16 (2) 153-176.

Kirkup G. (2002) Identity, community and distributed learning. In Lea, M. & Nicoll, K. (Eds.). Distributed Learning: Social, Cultural Approaches to Practice. London: Routledge/Falmer, 182-195.

Kirschner, P.A. & Lai, K-W (2007) Online communities of practice in education Technology Pedagogy and Education 16 (2) 127-132.

Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.

McLellan, H. (1995). Situated Learning Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications

McMillan, D. (1996), Sense of community, Journal of Community Psychology,. 24, 315-25.

Milstead J. & Nelson R. (1998) Preparation for an online asynchronous university doctoral course: lessons learned. Computers in Nursing 16(5), 247–258.

Moule, P. (2006) Developing the Communities of Practice, Framework for On- Line Learning Electronic Journal of E-learning, 4 (2) 133-140.

Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human Computer Interaction, 15, 139–179.

Petersen, K.B. (2007) e-Learning in Virtual Communities of Practice – And Beyond? Research Findings Based on Interviews with Students and Teachers in Second Language e-Learning Settings in Denmark. Proceedings of the 2nd Interntional Conference on e-Learning, New York, 28-29 June, np.

Raven, A. (2003), Team or Community of Practice Aligning Tasks, Structures and Technologies In Gibson, C.B. & Cohen, S.G. (Eds.), Virtual Teams that Work. San Francisco, CA: Wiley & Sons 292-306.

Robey, D., Khoo, H.M. & Powers, C. (2000). Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams. IEEE transaction on professional communication, 43 (1), 51-66.

Rogers, J. (2000) Communities of practice: A framework for fostering coherence in virtual learning communities Educational Technology and Society. 3 (3), 1-12.

Schmitz, J. and Fulk, J, (1991) Organizational colleagues, media richness, and electronic mail: a test of the social influence model of technology use Communication-Research. 18 Aug. 487-523.

Schrum, L. (1998). On-line education: A study of emerging pedagogy. In Cahoon, B. (Ed.), Adult Learning and the Internet, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 53–61.

Schwen, T. & Hara, N. (2003). Community of practice: A metaphor for online design?, The Information Society, 19, 257-270.

Seddon, K. & Postlethwaite, K. (2007) Creating and testing a model for tutors and participants to support the collaborative construction of knowledge online. Technology Pedagogy and Education 16 (2) 177-198.

Smith, P., Barty, K. & Stacey, E. (2005) Limitations of an established community of practice in developing online innovation, Breaking down boundaries: international experience in open, distance and flexible education. Proceedings of the 17th ODLAA conference, pp. 1-6, ODLAA, Adelaide.

Stacey, E., Smith, P.J. & Barty, K. (2004). Adult learners in the workplace: Online learning and communities of practice, Distance Education, 25 (1), 107-124.

Stokols, D., Fuqua, J., Gress, J., Harvey, R., Phillips, K., Baezconde-Garbanati, L, et al. (2003). Evaluating transdisciplinary science. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 5(Suppl. 1), S21–39.

Stokols, D., Harvey, R., Gress, J., Fuqua, J., & Phillips, K. (2005). In vivo studies of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration: Lessons learned and implications for active living research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(Suppl. 2), 202–213.

Stuckey, B. & Smith, J.D. (2004), Building sustainable communities of practice, in Hildreth, P. & Kimble, C. (Eds.), Knowledge Networks: Innovation through Communities of Practice, Hershey, PA: Idea Group.150-164.

Szulanski, G. (1992). Sticky Knowledge: Barriers to Knowing in the Firm. London: Sage Publications.

Tomes N. (2001) Technology-supported collaborative learning. In Falchicov, N. (Ed.) Learning Together – Peer Tutoring in Higher Education. London: Falmer, 275–291.

Trayner, B., Smith, J.D. & Bettoni, M. (2006) Participation in international virtual learning communities A social learning perspective CPsquare! ...the community of practice on communities of practice, retrieved June 6, 2007 from http://www.cpsquare.org/News/archives/Webist_Setubal_Final.pdf

Turkle S. (1997) Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. Touchstone Press, New York.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978), Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Warhurst, R. (2003) Learning to lecture: situating the knowing and learning of higher education teaching. Paper presented at British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Edinburgh, September

Wegerif R. (1998) The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. The Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 2(1), 34–39.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, : Cambridge University Press.

Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

White, I.K. and Pagano, R (2007) Making It Stick: The use of Online Discussion Fora to Support Continuing Professional Development in Higher Education Communities of Practice. Proceedings of the 2nd Interntional Conference on e-Learning, New York, 28-29 June, np.

Winkworth, I. and Gannon-Leary, P.(1999) Library performance measures: government perspectives. Paper presented at: 3rd Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services, Longhirst, Northumberland, August 26-31.

Wubbels, T. (2007) Do we know a community of practice when we see one? Technology Pedagogy and Education 16 (2) 225-233.