Gender Robustness of Overconfidence and Excess Entry

Danková, Katarína and Servátka, Maroš (2018): Gender Robustness of Overconfidence and Excess Entry.

Abstract

Camerer and Lovallo (1999) present a thought-provoking experimental evidence that overconfidence might lead to excess entry into markets. As their findings are based on the majority of the sessions exclusively consisting of male participants, we replicate their experiment while including both men and women in all of our sessions. We are able to only partially replicate their main finding that the market entry decisions are driven by overconfidence. Surprisingly we also find that self-selection significantly decreases the entry rate. However, this is also where we observe gender differences in the entry rate – males who self-select into the experiment actually enter more often, which is in line with Camerer & Lovallo’s observation. Our experiment thus points out that the overconfidence effect is sensitive to the participants’ gender and experimental conditions.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Experiment, Gender, Market Entry, Overconfidence, Real Effort, Replication, Robustness
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments; D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations; D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D47 - Market Design

References

Alicke, M. D. (1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1621.

Alpert, M. & Raiffa, H. (1982). A progress report on the training of probability assessors.

Barber, B. M. & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 261-292.

Bénabou, R. & Tirole, J. (2002). Self-confidence and personal motivation. Quarterly journal of economics, 871-915.

Bénabou, R. & Tirole, J. (2003). Self-knowledge and self-regulation: An economic approach. The psychology of economic decisions, 1, 137-167.

Beyer, S. (1990). Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59, 960.

Buehler, R., Griffin, D. & Ross, M. (1994). Exploring the" planning fallacy": Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of personality and social psychology, 67, 366.

Camerer, C. & Lovallo, D. (1999). Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. American economic review, 306-318.

Christensen-Szalanski, J. J. & Bushyhead, J. B. (1981). Physicians' use of probabilistic information in a real clinical setting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 7, 928.

Christoffersen, S. & Sarkissian, S. (2002). Location overconfidence. McGill University.

Clayson, D. E. (2005). Performance overconfidence: Metacognitive effects or misplaced student expectations? Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 122-129.

Collins, S. M., James, D., Servátka, M. & Woods, D. (2017). Price-setting and attainment of equilibrium: Posted offers versus an administered price. Games and Economic Behavior, 106, 277-293.

Cooper, D. J. & Kagel, J. H. (2009). The role of context and team play in cross-game learning. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7, 1101-1139.

Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D. & Subrahmanyam, A. (1998). Investor psychology and security market under‐and overreactions. the Journal of Finance, 53, 1839-1885.

Danková, K. (2015). Experiments on reciprocity, social comparison and overconfidence. Mimeo: University of Canterbury.

Deaves, R., Luders, E. & Luo, G. Y. (2009). An experimental test of the impact of overconfidence and gender on trading activity. Review of Finance, 13, 555-575.

Dunning, D., Meyerowitz, J. A. & Holzberg, A. D. (1989). Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57, 1082.

Fischbacher, U. (2007). Z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10, 171-178.

Forbes, W. (2009). Behavioural finance, John Wiley & Sons. Gervais, S. & Odean, T. (2001). Learning to be overconfident. Review of Financial studies, 14, 1-27.

Glaser, M., Langer, T. & Weber, M. (2005). Overconfidence of professionals and lay men: Individual differences within and between tasks?

Glaser, M., Langer, T. & Weber, M. (2007). On the trend recognition and forecasting ability of professional traders. Decision Analysis, 4, 176-193.

Healy, P. & Moore, D. (2007). Bayesian overconfidence.

Hoelzl, E. & Rustichini, A. (2005). Overconfident: Do you put your money on it?*. The Economic Journal, 115, 305-318.

Kirchler, E. & Maciejovsky, B. (2002). Simultaneous over-and underconfidence: Evidence from experimental asset markets. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 25, 65-85.

Klayman, J., Soll, J. B., Gonzalez-Vallejo, C. & Barlas, S. (1999). Overconfidence: It depends on how, what, and whom you ask. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 79, 216-247.

Kruger, J. (1999). Lake wobegon be gone! The" below-average effect" and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. Journal of personality and social psychology, 77, 221.

Locke, P. R. & Mann, S. C. House money and overconfidence on the trading floor. AFA 2002 Atlanta Meetings, 2001.

Lundeberg, M. A., Fox, P. W. & Puncochar, J. (1994). Highly confident but wrong: Gender differences and similarities in confidence judgments. Journal of educational psychology, 86, 114.

Malmendier, U. & Tate, G. (2005). Ceo overconfidence and corporate investment. The journal of finance, 60, 2661-2700.

Messick, D. M., Bloom, S., Boldizar, J. P. & Samuelson, C. D. (1985). Why we are fairer than others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 480-500.

Moore, D. A. & Cain, D. M. (2007). Overconfidence and underconfidence: When and why people underestimate (and overestimate) the competition. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 197-213.

Presson, P. K. & Benassi, V. A. (1996). Illusion of control: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 493.

Roll, R. (1986). The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of business, 197-216.

Selten, R. & Güth, W. Equilibrium point selection in a class of market entry games. Games, Economic Dynamics, and Time Series Analysis, 1982. Springer, 101-116.

Simon, M. & Houghton, S. M. (2003). The relationship between overconfidence and the introduction of risky products: Evidence from a field study. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 139-149.

Soll, J. B. & Klayman, J. (2004). Overconfidence in interval estimates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 299.

Svenson, O. (1981). Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers? Acta Psychologica, 47, 143-148.

Taylor, S. E. & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological bulletin, 103, 193.

Weinberg, B. A. (2009). A model of overconfidence. Pacific Economic Review, 14, 502-515.

Windschitl, P. D. & Chambers, J. R. (2004). The dud-alternative effect in likelihood judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 198.