Jamal, Haroon (2018): The Exploration of Subjective Well-being in the Context of Pakistan.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_87950.pdf Download (681kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper contributes to the literature on the subjective well-being (SWB) by providing empirical evidence regarding the correlates of SWB in the context of Pakistan. Instead of using single measure of life satisfaction or happiness to represent the level of SWB, a composite index with four different aspects; overall life satisfaction, happiness, financial satisfaction and subjective health status is developed for Pakistan using World Value Survey 2012 data. Differences in self-reported evaluation of current well-being are statistically explored through socio-demographic and behavioral characteristics of respondents.
The statistical exercise reveals that law and order situation or feeling ofinsecurity in neighborhood is the most significant factor which is impacting SWB with large negative marginal effect.Similarly, variables representing vulnerability to poverty and security are also statistically significant with an inverse relation with SWB. In contrast, the results reveal that religiosity plays a positive and significant role in explaining differences in SWB. Nonetheless, the marginal positive impact of religiosity is much less than the negative impacting factors.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Exploration of Subjective Well-being in the Context of Pakistan |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Subjective Well-being, Life satisfaction, Happiness, Determinants, Pakistan |
Subjects: | I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O53 - Asia including Middle East |
Item ID: | 87950 |
Depositing User: | Haroon Jamal |
Date Deposited: | 16 Jul 2018 16:27 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 13:10 |
References: | Adelman, I. and Morris, C. T. (1972), “The Measurement of Institutional Characteristics of Nations: Methodological Considerations”, The Journal of Development Studies Alexander, A. & C. Welzel (2011), “Islam and Patriarchy: How Robust Is Muslim Supportfor Patriarchal Values?” World Values Research 4(2): 40-70 Andrews, F. M. and Withey, S. B. (1976), Social Indicators of Well-Being: America’s Perception of Life Quality, Plenum, (New York) Baird, B., Lucas, R., and Donellan M. (2010),“Life Satisfaction Across the life Span: Findings From two Nationally Representative Panel Studies”,Social Indicators Research, 99, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9584-9 Blanchflower, D.G. and Oswald, A. (1998), “What makes an entrepreneur?” Journal of Labor Economics, 16, 26-60, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209881 Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004),“Well-being over time in Britain and the USA Journal ofPublic Economics, 88 BukenyaJames O., Tesfa G. Gebremedhin andPeter V. Schaeffer,(2003),“Analysis of Rural Quality of Life and Health: A Spatial Approach”, Economic Development Quarterly, Volume: 17 issue: 3, page(s): 280-293 Campbell, A. (1974), “Quality of life is a psychological phenomenon”, in: B. Strumpel (ed.) Subjective Elements of Well-Being (OECD, Paris), pp. 9–19 Christopher G. Ellison (1991), “Religious Involvement and Subjective Well-Being”, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Vol. 32(1) Cummins, R.A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J. et al. (2003), “Developing A National Index of Subjective Wellbeing: The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index”, Social Indicators Research 64: 159. Diener, E., Gohm, C., Suh, E., &Oishi, S. (1998), “Similarity of the relations between marital status and subjective well-being across cultures”, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31 (4) Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999), “Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress”, Psychological Bulletin, 125 Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008), Do We Really Know What Makes us Happy? A Review of the Economic Literature on the Factors Associated With Subjective Well-Being.Journal of Economic Psychology, 29 Emma Samman (2007), “Psychological and Subjective Well-being: A Proposal for Internationally Comparable Indicators”, Oxford Development Studies, 35:4, 459-486, DOI: 10.1080/13600810701701939 Ferrante, F. (2009), “Education, Aspirations and Life Satisfaction”, Kyklos, 62: 542-562, Ferrer-i-Carbonell, Ada and Gowdy, John (2007),“Environmental Degradation and Happiness”, Ecological Economics, 60, 509-516 Frey, B. S. (2008),“Happiness: A revolution in economics”, Munich Lectures in Economics Graham, C. (2004),“Can happiness research contribute to development economics?” Massachusetts Avenuedevelopment seminar, Economic and Governance Studies Programs, The Brookings Institution Graham, C. (2005),“The economics of happiness”, World Economics, 6(3) Layard, R. (2005), Happiness: Lessons from a New Science, London: Allen Lane Lucas, R. (2007), Adaptation and the Set-Point Model of Subjective Well-Being. Does Happiness Change after Major Life Events? Current Directions in Psychological Science 16(2): 75-79 MastekaasaA. (1994), “Psychological Well-Being and Marital Dissolution: Selection Effects?” Journal of Family Issues, Volume: 15 issue: 2, Issue published: June 1, 1994 Martin, P. (2005),Making Happy People: The Nature of Happiness and its Origins in Child-hood, London and New York: Fourth Estate. Myers, D. G. (2000), “The funds, friends, and faith of happy people”, American Psychologist, 55, 56–67 Paloma, M. M., & Pendleton, B. F. (1990), “Religious domains and general well-being”, Social IndicatorsResearch, 22, 255-276, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00301101 Schimmel, J. (2009),“Development as happiness: The subjective perception of happiness and UNDP’sanalysis of poverty, wealth and development”, Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(1) Schwarz, Norbert and Fritz Strack (1999), ‘Reports of Subjective Well-Being: JudgmentalProcesses and Their Methodological Implications.’ In: Daniel Kahneman, Ed Dienerand Norbert Schwarz (eds.) Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 61-84 Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., and Fitoussi, J. (2009), “Report by the commission on the measurement of economicperformance and social progress.Retrieved from http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en/index.htm Tavakol, M., and Dennick, R. (2011),“Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha”, International Journal of MedicalEducation, 2, 53–55 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/87950 |