Chichilnisky, Graciela
(2011):
*Catastrophic Risks with Finite or Infinite States.*
Published in: International Journal of Ecological Economics & Statistics (IJEES
, Vol. 23,
(2011): pp. 1-18.

Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_88760.pdf Download (208kB) | Preview |

## Abstract

Catastrophic risks are rare events with major consequences, such as market crashes, catastrophic climate change, asteroids or the extinction of a species. We show that classic expected utility theory based on Von Neumann axioms is insensitive to rare events no matter how catastrophic. Its insensitivity emerges from a requirement of continuity (e.g. Arrow's Monotone Continuity Axiom, and its relatives as defined by De Groot, Hernstein and Milnor) that anticipate average responses to extreme events. This leads to countably additive measures and `expected utility' that are insensitive to extreme risks. In a new axiomatic extension, the author (Chichilnisky 1996, 2000, 2002) requires equal treatment of rare and frequent events, deriving the new decision criterion the axioms imply. These are expected utility combined with purely finitely additive measures that focus on catastrophes, and explain the presistent observations of distributions with "fat tails" in earth sciences and financial markets. Continuity is based on the `topology of fear' introduced in Chichilnisky (2009), and is linked to Debreu's 1953 work on Adam Smith's Invisible Hand. The balance between the classic and the new axioms tests the limits of non- parametric estimation in Hilbert spaces, Chichilnisky (2008).. extending the foundations of probability & statistics (Chichilnisky 2009 and 2010) to include "black swans" or rare events, and finite as well as infinite state spaces.

Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|

Original Title: | Catastrophic Risks with Finite or Infinite States |

English Title: | Catastrophic Risks with Finite or Infinite States |

Language: | English |

Keywords: | catastrophic risks, choice under uncertainty, black swans, green economics, incompleteness of mathematics, axiom of choice |

Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics |

Item ID: | 88760 |

Depositing User: | Graciela Chichilnisky |

Date Deposited: | 31 Aug 2018 23:44 |

Last Modified: | 12 Oct 2019 16:40 |

References: | Allais, M.,1988, The general theory of random choices in relation to the invariant cardinal utility function and the specific probability function. In Munier, B.R. (ed.) Risk Decision and Rationality, Reidel Dordrecht The Netherlands, p: 233- 289. Arrow, K., 1963, Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing. Yrjo Jahnsson Lectures, Yrjo Jahonssonin Saatio, Helsinki , 1971, and North Holland, Amsterdam. Cass, D., Chichilnisky, G. and Wu, H., 1996, Individual Risks and Mutual Insurance. Econometrica, 64 (2), 333-341. Chanel, O. and Chichilnisky, G., 2007, Experimental Validation of Axioms of Choice under Uncertainty Involving Fear, Working Paper GREQAM, Universite de Marseille. Chichilnisky, G., 1977, Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Optimal Economic Growth, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 2, 61, 504-520. Chichilnisky, G., 1996, Updating Von Neumann Morgenstern Axioms for Choice under Uncertainty Proceedings of a Conference on Catastrophic Risks, The Fields Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Toronto Canada. Chichilnisky, G., 2000, An Axiomatic Approach to Choice under Uncertainty with Catastrophic Risks. Resource and Energy Economics, 22, 221-231 Chichilnisky, G., 2002, Catastrophic Risk, Encyclopedia of Environmetrics, edited by Abdel H. El Shaarawi and Walter W. Piegorsch, published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, Volume 1, 274-279. Chichilnisky, G., 2006, Catastrophic Risks: The Need for New Tools, Financial Instruments and Institutions, Symposium on the Privatization of Risk - Social Science Research Council, New York June. Chichilnisky, G., 2009, The Topology of Fear, presented at the NBER conference in honor of Gerard Debreu at UC Berkeley, November 2005, Journal of Mathematical Economics, in press. Chichilnisky, G., 2009, NP Estimation in Hilbert Spaces: the Limits of Econometrics, presented at University of Essex Conference in Honor of Rex Bergstrom (org. Peter Philips) June 2006, Econometric Theory, 25, 1-17. Chichilnisky, G., 2009, The Foundations of Statistics with Black Swans, Mathematical Social Sciences, 54, 2, 184-192. Chichilnisky, G., 2009, The Foundations of Probability with Black Swans, Journal of Probability and Statistics, 2010. Chichilnisky, G., 2009, La paradox des marches vertes, Les Echos Chichilnisky, G. and Eisenberger, 2010, Asteroids, Journal of Probability and Statistics, 2010. Chichilnisky, G., Kim, D. and Wu, H. M., 2005, An Axiomatic Approach to Equity Premium, Working Paper, Columbia University, Yale University, and National University of Taiwan. Chichilnisky, G. and Wu, H. M., 2006, General Equilibrium with Endogenous Uncertainty and Default, Journal of Mathematical Economics, 42, 499-524. Hernstein, N. and Milnor, J., 1953, An Axiomatic Approach to Measurable Utility, Econometrica, 21, 291-297. Machina, M., 1982, Expected Utility Analysis without the Independent Axiom, Econometrica, 50, 277- International Journal of Ecological Economics & Statistics Debreu, G. 1954, Valuation Equilibrium and Pareto Optimum, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 40, 588-92. United Nations, 1997, Millenium Report 2000. "A Note on Weak --Chichilnisky Rules." Social Choice and Welfare 14, 2, 357-59. De Groot, M. H., 1970, Optimal Statistical Decisions, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey. Godel, K., 1940, The Consistency of Axiom of Choice and the Continuum Hypothesis. Annals of Mathematical Studies 3, Princeton University Press, Princeton New Jersey, USA. Kahneman, M. and Tversky, A., 1979, Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions under Risk, Econometrica, 47, 2, 263-291. Le Doux, J., 1996, The Emotional Brain, Simon and Schuster. Machina, M., 1989, Dynamic Consistency and Non-Expected Utility Models of Choice under Uncertainty, Journal of Economic Literature, 27, 1622-1688, December. Mehra, R., 2003, The Equity Premium: Why Is It a Puzzle? Financial Analysts Journal, Jan/Feb: 54 69, pp 54-69. Mehra, R., and Prescott, E.C., 1985, The Equity Premium: A Puzzle, Journal of Monetary Economics, 15, 2, 145-161. Rietz, T.A., 1988, The Equity Risk Premium: A Solution, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 1, 117 131. Tversky, A. and Wakker, P., 1995, Risk Attitudes and Decision Weights, Econometrica, 6, 1225-1280. Posner, R., 2004, Catastrophes, Risk and Resolution, Oxford University Press. Villegas, C., 1964, On Quantitative Probability V � Algebras, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 35, 1789 - 1800. Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O., 1944, Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour, Princeton University Press. Weil, P., 1989, The Equity Premium Puzzle and the Risk-Free Rate Puzzle, Journal of Monetary Economics, 24, 3, 401-421 |

URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/88760 |