Forestland and household welfares in North Central Provinces, Vietnam

Quang Tran, Tuyen and Viet Nguyen, Thanh (2018): Forestland and household welfares in North Central Provinces, Vietnam. Published in: Land Use Policy , Vol. 79, (3 August 2018): pp. 10-19.

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of forestland on household income, poverty and inequality among households in Vietnam’s poorest rural districts, the North Central Provinces, using data from the Quantitative Socio-Economic Survey for Emission Reduction-Program (ERP) Provinces Areas [QSESERPA]. Local people are extremely poor, with 54% living below the poverty line. Forest income constitutes about 17% of their total income; only wage income (37%) ranks higher. Surprisingly, those better off depend on forest income more than the poor do. Such income is comprised mainly of non-timber forest plants (77%), followed by timber products (18%). Our micro-econometric analysis indicates that gaining access to more forestland would increase household per capita income and reduce the incidence and intensity of poverty, even after controlling for all other variables in the model. In addition, we find that forest income was the second largest contributor to overall income inequality and had the largest marginal effect on it. A policy implication here is that increasing the access of the poor to forest resources and improving their efficiency in forest management could have a substantial effect on income, poverty and inequality in the study area.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: forestland; forest income; fractional probit; Gini decomposition; shortfall
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q15 - Land Ownership and Tenure ; Land Reform ; Land Use ; Irrigation ; Agriculture and Environment; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q24 - Land; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R2 - Household Analysis

References

Adams, R. H. (1991). The effects of international remittances on poverty, inequality, and development in rural Egypt (Vol. 86). Washington, D.C: International Food Research Institute.

Angelsen, A., Jagger, P., Babigumira, R., Belcher, B., Hogarth, N. J., Bauch, S., . . . Wunder, S. (2014). Environmental income and rural livelihoods: a global-comparative analysis. World Development, 64, S12-S28.

Behera, B. (2009). Explaining the performance of state–community joint forest management in India. Ecological Economics, 69(1), 177-185.

Coudouel, A., Hentschel, J. S., & Wodon, Q. T. (2002). Poverty measurement and analysis. In J. Klugman (Ed.), A Sourcebook for poverty reduction strategies (Vol. 1, pp. 27-74). Washington, D.C: World Bank.

Das, N. (2010). Incidence of forest income on reduction of inequality: Evidence from forest dependent households in milieu of joint forest management. Ecological Economics, 69(8), 1617-1625.

De Jong, W., & Van Hung, T. (2006). Forest Rehabilitation in Vietnam: Histories, Realities, and Future: Histories, Realities, and Future: CIFOR.

Foster, J., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures. Econometrica, 53(3), 761-766.

GSO. (2015). Results of Vienam Household Living Standard Survey 2014. Hanoi, Vietnam: General Statistical Office.

Hogarth, N. J., Belcher, B., Campbell, B., & Stacey, N. (2013). The role of forest-related income in household economies and rural livelihoods in the border-region of Southern China. World Development, 43, 111-123.

Jann, B. (2016). Estimating Lorenz and concentration curves. Stata Journal, 16(4), 837-866.

Kar, S. P., & Jacobson, M. G. (2012). NTFP income contribution to household economy and related socio-economic factors: Lessons from Bangladesh. Forest Policy and Economics, 14(1), 136-142.

Lerman, R. I., & Yitzhaki, S. (1985). Income inequality effects by income source: a new approach and applications to the United States. The review of economics and statistics, 151-156.

MARD. (2016). Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF), Emission Reductions Program Document (ER-PD),ER Program Name and Country: Vietnam. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. Hanoi, Vietnam.

Mcelwee, P. D. (2008). Forest environmental income in Vietnam: household socioeconomic factors influencing forest use. Environmental conservation, 35(2), 147-159.

MDRI. (2016). Quantitative socio-economic survey for Emission Reduction Program (ER-P) provinces area. Mekong Development Research Institute. Hanoi, Vietnam.

Muller, D., Epprecht, M., & Sunderlin, W. D. (2006). Where are the poor and where are the trees?: targeting of poverty reduction and forest conservation in Vietnam: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).

Nguyen, H. T. (2009). Human ecological analysis of land and forest use by the Hmong people for harmonising with the governmental reforestation program in Vietnam. (MSc), Technischen Universität Dresden, Germany.

Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. (1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401 (k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 619-632.

PricewaterhouseCoopers [PWC]. (2016). Doing Business in Vietnam. Hanoi, Vietnam: PricewaterhouseCoopers (Vietnam) Ltd.

Rahut, D. B., Behera, B., & Ali, A. (2016). Do forest resources help increase rural household income and alleviate rural poverty? Empirical evidence from Bhutan. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 25(3), 187-198.

Stark, O., Taylor, J. E., & Yitzhaki, S. (1986). Remittances and inequality. The Economic Journal, 96(383), 722-740.

Sunderlin, W. D., & Huynh, T. B. (2005). Poverty alleviation and forests in Vietnam. Jakarta, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).

The National Assembly. (2004). Law on Forest Protection and Development. (No. 29/2004/QH11). Hanoi, Vietnam: The National Assembly of Vietnam.

Thulstrup, A. W. (2015). Livelihood resilience and adaptive capacity: Tracing changes in household access to capital in Central Vietnam. World Development, 74, 352-362.

To, P. X., Dressler, W. H., Mahanty, S., Pham, T. T., & Zingerli, C. (2012). The prospects for payment for ecosystem services (PES) in Vietnam: a look at three payment schemes. Human Ecology, 40(2), 237-249.

Tran, T. Q. (2015a). Nonfarm employment and household income among ethnic minorities in Vietnam. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28(1), 703-716. doi:10.1080/1331677X.2015.1087872

Tran, T. Q. (2015b). Socio-Economic Determinants of Household Income among Ethnic Minorities in the North-West Mountains, Vietnam. Croatian Economic Survey, 17(1), 139-159.

Tran, T. Q. (2016). Income sources and inequality among ethnic minorities in the Northwest region, Vietnam. Environment, development and sustainability, 18(4), 1239-1254.

Tran, T. Q., Lim, S., Cameron, M., & Vu, H. V. (2014). Farmland loss, nonfarm diversification and inequality among households in Hanoi's peri-urban areas, Vietnam. International development planning review, 36(3), 357-379.

Tran, T. Q., Nguyen, S. H., Vu, H. V., & Nguyen, V. Q. (2015). A note on poverty among ethnic minorities in the Northwest region of Vietnam. Post-communist economies, 27(2), 268-281.

Van de Walle, D., & Cratty, D. (2004). Is the emerging non‐farm market economy the route out of poverty in Vietnam? Economics of Transition, 12(2), 237-274.

Vietnamembassy-usa. (2017). Vietnam: Geography. Retrieved from http://vietnamembassy-usa.org/vietnam/geography

WB. (2005). Chapter 4: Measures of poverty. In WB (Ed.), Introduction to poverty analysis (pp. 69-82). Washington D.C: World Bank Institute.

WB. (2011). Vietnam Development Report 2011: Natural Resources Management, Joint development partner report to the Vietnam Consultative Group Meeting, Hanoi, December 7–8, 2010. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

WB. (2016). Vietnam: Sustainable Plantation and Livelihoods for Low-income Farmers. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/en/results/2016/04/12/vietnam-sustainable-plantation-and-livelihoods-for-low-income-farmers

Wunder, S., Angelsen, A., & Belcher, B. (2014). Forests, livelihoods, and conservation: broadening the empirical base. World Development, 61(1), 1-11.