Kirrane, Chris (2003): The Choice of Exchange Rate Regimes for EU Accession Countries. Published in: European Political Economy Review , Vol. No. 2, No. Autumn (1 August 2003): pp. 188-206.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_88877.pdf Download (523kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article examines the institutional changes of Central Banks and the exchange rate regimes of Eastern European countries joining the EU. Current regimes and how they need to evolve in order to meet the entry criteria of the EU and EMU are looked at. In addition, the degree to which the candidate countries meet the accession criteria and compare them with the performance of the latest EU entrants will be studied. After concluding that the accession criteria do not necessarily favour a particular exchange rate regime, the pros and cons of the two plans considered as the most stable, currency board and inflation target will be analysed. Under these two regimes, the respect of the criteria of low inflation and exchange rate stability is likely to produce strong tensions.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Choice of Exchange Rate Regimes for EU Accession Countries |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Exchange rate regimes |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E42 - Monetary Systems ; Standards ; Regimes ; Government and the Monetary System ; Payment Systems |
Item ID: | 88877 |
Depositing User: | Dr Christopher Kirrane |
Date Deposited: | 15 Sep 2018 07:54 |
Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2019 12:38 |
References: | BALASSA, B. (1964). The Purchasing Power Parity Doctrine: A Reappraisal, Journal of Political Economy, December. BAYOUMI, T. and P. R. MASSON (1994). Fiscal flows in the United States and Canada: Lessons for monetary union in Europe. Discussion Paper 1057, Centre for Economic Policy Research (November). BEAUMONT C., R. CORKER, R. VAN ELKAN and D. IAKOVA (2000). Exchange Rate Regimes in Selected Advanced Transition Economies-Coping with Transition, Capital Inflows, and EU Accession. IMF Policy Discussion Paper PDP/00/3. BERD (2000). Transition Report 2000, London, UK. BERGLOF, E and ROLAND, G. (2000). From Regatta to ‘Big Bang’ - The Impact of the EU Accession Strategy on Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe, IMF Working Paper, August. BUITER, W. (1997). The economic case for monetary union in the European Union. in C.Deissenberg, R.F. Owen and D. Ulph eds. European Economic Integration, supplement to the Review of International Economics, 5(4): pp. 0-35. BUITER, W. H. and SIBERT, A. S. (2000). Targets, Instruments and Institutional Arrangements for an Effective Monetary Authority, Seventh L.K. Jha Memorial Lecture, October, Reserve Bank of India. CAGAN, P. (1956). The monetary dynamics of hyperinflation, in Milton Friedman ed. Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money, Chicago, the University of Chicago Press. CALVO, G. A. and LEIDERMANN, L. (1992). Optimal inflation tax under pre-commitment: Theory and evidence. American Economic Review (March), pp. 179-94. CHANG, Roberto and VELASCO, Andres (1998). Financial fragility and the exchange rate regime. NBER Working Paper 6469 (March). CHRISTOFFERSON, P. F. and WESCOTT, R.F. (1999). Is Poland Ready for Inflation Targeting? IMF Working Paper WP/99/41. DELLA PAOLERA, G. and TAYLOR, A. (1999). Internal versus external convertibility and developing country financial crisis: Lessons from the Argentinean bank bailout of the 1930’s. NBER Working Paper 7386 (October). FISCHER, S. (1994). Russia and the Soviet Union Then and Now, in O.J. Blanchard, K.A. Froot and J.D. Sachs eds. The Transition in Eastern Europe, Vol. 1. Country Studies, pp. 221-252. NBER, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London. FISCHER, S. (2001). Exchange Rate Regimes: Is the Bipolar View Correct?, Mimeo, IMF, January. FRANKEL, J. A. (1999).No single currency regime is right for all countries or at all times. NBER Working Paper 7338 (September). GHOSH, A. R., GULDE, A.-M. and WOLF, H. C. (2000). Currency boards: more than a quick fix, Economic Policy, 31, October 2000, pp. 271-335. GULDE, A.-M., KÄHKÖNEN, J. and KELLER, P. (2000). Pros and Cons of Currency Board Arrangements in the Lead-up to EU Accession and Participation in the Euro Zone, IMF Policy Discussion Paper, PDP/00/1, January, HESTON, A., NUXOLL, D. A. and SUMMERS, R. (1994). The Differential-Productivity Hypothesis and Purchasing-Power Parities: Some New Evidence, Review of International Economics; 2(3), October, pp. 227-43. KAREKEN, J. WALLACE, and N. (1981). The indeterminacy of equilibrium exchange rates, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 96, May, pp. 207-22. KIRRANE, C. (1996). Maastrict and Monetary Cooperation. European Economic Integration Review, Vol. 14, p.49-59. KIRRANE, C. (2003). The IMS and the Euro. European Political Economy Review No. 1 (March 2003), pp. 153-65 MASSON, P. R. (1999). Monetary and exchange rate policy of transition economies of Central and Eastern Europe after the launch of EMU. IMF Policy Discussion Paper PDP/99/5. MCKINNON, R. I. (1963). Optimum currency areas. American Economic Review 53 (September), pp. 717-25. MISHKIN, F. S. (2000). “Inflation targeting in emerging market countries.” NBER Working Paper 7618. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/88877 |