Syed, Jawad and Murray, Peter A. (2006): The participation of women in multidisciplinary action teams. Published in: Making the Link: Affirmative Action and Employment Relations No. 17 (2006): pp. 65-72.
Download (86kB) | Preview
This paper argues the case for increasing the participation of women in multidisciplinary action teams as a means for making better use of gender diversity. We argue that conventional diversity management practices involve a narrow approach towards increasing women’s participation in employment. We suggest it is imperative that organisations and multidisciplinary action teams learn to integrate skilled and talented women and men into a single, cohesive work culture that enhances teams’ performing capacities. Based on recent work by the authors, we then build on the belief that women are a key resource for improving the integrative and interpretive abilities of teams, including the capacity of the team generally to deal with difficult and complex scenarios. The paper builds a relationship between feminine values, team-member diversity, and communication skills such as listening and speaking up. In particular, we examine some evidence relating to the communication patterns of women and how they may assist multi-disciplinary action teams.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The participation of women in multidisciplinary action teams|
|Keywords:||diversity management; feminine values; teams; women|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O15 - Human Resources ; Human Development ; Income Distribution ; Migration
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J16 - Economics of Gender ; Non-labor Discrimination
|Depositing User:||Jawad Syed|
|Date Deposited:||29. May 2008 03:54|
|Last Modified:||22. Feb 2013 03:47|
Akan, O.H. 2005, The role of concrescent conversation in the performing stage of work groups, Team Performance Management, 11(1/2), 51-62
Appelbaum, S.H., Audet, L. and Miller, J.C. 2003, Gender and leadership? Leadership and gender? A journey through the landscape of theories, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24(1), 43-51
Austin, J.L. 1962, How to Do Things with Words, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Barham, K., Fraser, J. and Heath, L. 1988, Management for the Future, Foundation of Management Education/ Ashridge Management College.
Bartol, K.M. 1999, Gender influences on performance evaluations, in G.N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of Gender in Organizations, 165–178, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bechhard, R. and Pritchard, W. 1992, Changing the Essence: The Art of Creating and Leading Fundamental Change in Organizations, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Beck, D. and E. Davis, 2004, ‘EEO: A political and organisational challenge’, in E. Davis and V. Pratt (Eds), Making the Link 15: Affirmative Action and Employment Relations, 1-7, Sydney: CCH Australia Limited.
Belenky, M.F., Clinchy, B.M., Goldberger, N.R. and Tarule, J.M. 1986, Women’s Way of Knowing, New York: Basic Books
Boiney, L.G. 2001, Gender impacts virtual work teams: Men want clear objectives while women value communication, The Graziadio Business Report, Fall 2001, Available at: http://gbr.pepperdine.edu/014/teams.html Accessed 10 March 2006.
Bourke, J. 2004, ‘Getting serious about diversity: Best practice’, in E. Davis and V. Pratt (Eds), Making the Link 15: Affirmative Action and Employment Relations, 15-18, Sydney: CCH Australia Limited.
Bowen, C., Swim, J.K., and Jacobs, R.R. 2000, Gender and performance appraisals in field settings: A meta-analysis, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 2194–2215.
Catalyst 1998, Advancing Women in Business: The Catalyst Guide, New York: Jossey-Bass.
Claes, M. 1999, Women, men and management styles, International Labour Review, 138 (4), 431-446
Cohen, L.L. and Swim, J.K., 1995, The differential impact of gender ratios on women and men: Tokenism, self-confidence, and expectations, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 876-883.
Davison, K.H., and Burke, M.J. 2000, Sex discrimination in simulated selection contexts: A meta-analytic study, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 225–248.
Eagly, A., and Johnson, B. 1990, Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.
Elsass, P.M. and Graves, L.M. 1997, Demographic diversity in decision-making groups: the experience of women and people of color, Academy of Management Review, 22(4)
Ely, R. 1994, The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 203-238.
EOWA 2003, Australian Women in Leadership Census, Available at: www.eowa.gov.au Accessed 10 March 2006
Fairclough, N. 1989, Language and Power, London: Longman.
Fischer, M.L. and Glejim, H. 1992, The gender gap in management: A challenging affair, Industrial and Commercial Training, 24(4), 5-11.
Ford, J.D. and Ford, L.W. 1995, The role of conversations in producing intentional change in organizations, Academy of Management Review, 20, 541-70.
Giles, H. and Coupland, N. 1991, Accommodating language, in H. Giles and N. Coupland (Eds), Language, Context and Consequences, 60-84, Buckingham: Open University Press.
Grant, J. 1988, Women as managers: What they can offer to organizations, Organizational Dynamics, 16(3), 56-63.
Hall, E. 1996, Oral presentation at the 22nd Linguistic Agency, University of Duisburg (LAUD), Symposium on Intercultural Communication, held at Duisburg.
Hare, A.P., Koenigs, R.J. and Hare, S.E. 1997, Perceptions of observed and model values of male and female managers, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 437-47.
Harrington, B. 2000, Cohesion, conflict, and group demography: A multi-method integration, Paper presented at the annual convention of the Academy of Management, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Helgesen, S. 1990, The Female Advantage: Women’s Ways of Leadership, New York: Doubleday.
Hofstede, G. 1980, Cultures Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values, Newbury Park: Sage.
Hofstede, G. 1991, Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, London: McGraw-Hill.
Jewell, M. and Whicker, M.L. 1994, Legislative Leadership in the American States, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
Kabacoff, R. 1998, Gender differences in organizational leadership: A large sample study, Paper presented at the Annual American Psychological Association Convention, San Francisco.
Kanter, R. M. 1977, Men and Women of the Corporation, New York: Basic Books
Karakowsky, L. and Miller, D. 2002, Teams that listen and teams that do not: Exploring the role of gender in group responsiveness to negative feedback, Team Performance Management, 8(7/8), 146-156
Kirkman, B.L. and Rosen, B. 2000, Powering up teams, Organisational Dynamics, 28(3) 48.
Kirner, J. and Rayner, M. 1999, The Women's Power Handbook, Ringwood, Victoria: Viking/Penguin.
Koch, S.C., Muller, S.M., Schroeer, A., Thimm, C., Kruse, L. and Zumbach, J. 2005, Gender at work: Eavesdropping on communication patterns in two token teams, in S. Anolli, S. Duncan, M. Magnusson and G. Riva (Eds), The Hidden Structure of Interaction: From Neurons to Culture Patterns, 266-279, Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Kotter, J. 1990, A Force for Change: How Leadership Differs from Management, New York: Free Press.
Lakoff, R. 1975, Language and Women’s Place, New York: Harper and Row.
Lipsey, R.G., Steiner, P.O., Purvis, D.D. and Courant, P.N. 1990, Economics, New York: Harper and Row.
Lyness, K. and Thompson, D. 1997, Above the glass ceiling? A comparison of matched samples of female and male executives, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 359-375.
Martell, R.F. 1996, Sex discrimination at work, in K.M. Borman and P. Dubeck (Eds), Handbook of Women and Work, 329–332, New York: Garland.
Martell, R.F. and DeSmet, A.L. 2001, A Diagnostic-Ratio Approach to Measuring Beliefs About the Leadership Abilities of Male and Female Managers, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1223–1239
McDonald, T.W., Toussaint, L.L. and Schweiger, J.A., 2004, The influence of social status on token women leaders’ expectations about leading male-dominated groups, Sex Roles, 50, 401-409.
Minzberg, H. 1973, The Nature of Managerial Work, New York: Harper and Row.
Murray, P, and Syed, J., 2006, The learning domains of team effectiveness. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, Georgia, August 11-16.
Perry, E.L., Davis-Blake, A., and Kulik, C.T. 1994, Explaining gender-based selection decisions: A synthesis of contextual and cognitive approaches, Academy of Management Review, 19, 786–820.
Peters, C. 2002, Gender in Communication: Micropolitics at Work, AARE 2002, International Education Research Conference, Brisbane, 1-5 December 2002
Poole, M.S. and DeSanctis, G. 1990, Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration, in J. Fulk and C. Steinfield (Eds), Organizations and Communication Technology, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Powell, G.N. 1988, Women and Men in Management, Newbury Park: Sage.
Reskin, B.F., and Ross, C.E. 1995, Jobs, authority, and earnings among managers: The continuing significance of sex, in J.A. Jacobs (Ed.), Gender Inequality at Work, 127-151, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Shotter, J. 1993, Conversational Realities: Constructing Life Through Language, London: Sage.
Sigman, S J., (Ed) 1995, “Introduction”, The Consequentiality of Communication, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sinclair, A. 1994, Trials at the top: Chief executives talk about men, women and the Australian executive culture, Parkville, Victoria: The Australian Centre, University of Melbourne.
Singh, P., Finn, D. and Goulet, L. 2004, Gender and job attitudes: A re-examination and extension, Women in Management Review, 19(7), 345-355
Stanford, J.H., Oates, B.R. and Flores, D. 1995, Women's leadership styles: a heuristic analysis, Women in Management Review, 10(2), 9-16.
Stark, E.E., 2003, Undelivered promises from the hr profession: A plea to return to a more defensible motivation for embracing diversity, Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 4(3), 299-317
Syed, J. and Ali, F. 2005, ‘Minority ethnic women in the Australian labour market’, in E. Davis and V. Pratt (Eds), Making the Link 16: Affirmative Action and Employment Relations, 48-54, Sydney: CCH Australia Limited
Voronov, M. and Singer, J.A. 2002, The myth of individualism-collectivism: A critical review, The Journal of Social Psychology, 142(4), 461-80.
Weizmann, H.C., and Weizmann, J.K. 2000, Rewards and Business Strategy, Chicago, IL: CCH, Inc.
Williams, K. Y., and O’Reilly, C.A. 1998, Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research, in B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, 15, 77-140.
Yoder, J.D. and Sinnett, J. 1985, Is it all in the numbers? A case study of tokenism, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 413-418
Yoder, J.D., Schleicher, T.S. and McDonald, T.W. 1998, Empowering token women leaders: The importance of organizationally legitimated credibility, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 209-222.