Associating Facebook Measurable Activities with Personality Traits: A Fuzzy Sets Approach

Misirlis, Nikolaos and Lekakos, George and Vlachopoulou, Maro (2018): Associating Facebook Measurable Activities with Personality Traits: A Fuzzy Sets Approach. Published in: Journal of Tourism, Heritage & Services Marketing , Vol. 4, No. 2 (15 November 2018): pp. 10-16.

Abstract

In this study we identify potential associations between people’s personality (utilizing the popular Big Five personality model) and measurable Facebook activities such as number of likes received, number of posts, number of comments on posts. Extant literature suggests that personality can be manifested through different features of the Facebook profiles but under an implicit assumption that those users may belong in a single psychographic group. However, it has been shown that people may share characteristics, common acts and behaviors of more than one psychographic group. In this study we aim to address limitations of previous studies, by adopting a fuzzy set approach which is capable to handle users’ membership in multiple psychographic groups. Furthermore, fsQCA offers equifinality, which means that research can end up to the same outcome, beginning from different initial combinations of data. The work presented here provides empirical evidence concerning the association between Facebook activities and users' personalities in a novel way indicating the significance of this relationship and providing alternative combinations that lead to the same output. Furthermore, it paves the ground towards predicting social platforms' measurements, other than Facebook, relying on users' personalities, using the same technique but on different fields of study and social media platforms.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Big Five; fsQCA; Facebook; personality traits; Facebook measurements
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C8 - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology ; Computer Programs; L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L82 - Entertainment ; Media; L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L83 - Sports ; Gambling ; Restaurants ; Recreation ; Tourism; L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L86 - Information and Internet Services ; Computer Software

References

Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Vinitzky, G. (2010). Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1289-1295. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.018

Arterberry, B. J., Martens, M. P., Cadigan, J. M., & Rohrer, D. (2014). Application of Generalizability Theory to the Big Five Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 69(0), 98-103. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.015

Augustine, A. A., & Hemenover, S. H. (2008). Extraversion and the consequences of social interaction on affect repair. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(5), 1151-1161. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.11.009

Bachrach, Y., Kosinski, M., Graepel, T., Kohli, P., & Stillwell, D. (2012). Personality and patterns of Facebook usage. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, Evanston, Illinois.

Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks.

Basurto, X., & Speer, J. (2012). Structuring the Calibration of Qualitative Data as Sets for Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). Field Methods. doi: 10.1177/1525822x11433998

Baumgartner, M. (2015). Parsimony and causality. Quality & Quantity, 49(2), 839-856.

Cárdenas, J. (2012). Varieties of corporate networks: Network analysis and fsQCA. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 53(4), 298-322.

Carpenter, J. M., Green, M. C., & LaFlam, J. (2011). People or profiles: Individual differences in online social networking use. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 538-541. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.11.006

Chatzigeorgiou, C. (2017). Modelling the impact of social media influencers on behavioural intentions of millennials: The case of tourism in rural areas in Greece. Journal of Tourism, Heritage & Services Marketing, 3(2), 25–29. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1209125

Choi, J., & Kim, Y. (2014). The moderating effects of gender and number of friends on the relationship between self-presentation and brand-related word-of-mouth on Facebook. Personality and Individual Differences, 68(0), 1-5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.040

Choi, Y.-C., & Lee, J.-H. (2015). What most Matters in Strengthening Educational Competitiveness?: An Application of FS/QCA Method. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 2182-2190. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.354

Christou, E. (2015). Branding social media in the travel industry. Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 175, pp 607-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1244

Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 247-253. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003

Čukić, I., & Bates, T. C. (2014). Openness to experience and aesthetic chills: Links to heart rate sympathetic activity. Personality and Individual Differences, 64(0), 152-156. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.012

De Raad, B. (2000). The Big Five Personality Factors: The psycholexical approach to personality: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.

Ding, C., Cheng, H. K., Duan, Y., & Jin, Y. (2017). The power of the “like” button: The impact of social media on box office. Decision Support Systems, 94, 77-84. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2016.11.002

Downey, J., & Stanyer, J. (2010). Comparative media analysis: Why some fuzzy thinking might help. Applying fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to the personalization of mediated political communication. European Journal of Communication, 25(4), 331-347.

El Sawy, O. A., Malhotra, A., Park, Y., & Pavlou, P. A. (2010). Research Commentary—Seeking the Configurations of Digital Ecodynamics: It Takes Three to Tango. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 835-848. doi: 10.1287/isre.1100.0326

Engeli, I., Allison, C. R., & Allison, C. R. (2014). Comparative policy studies: Conceptual and methodological challenges: Springer.

Garcia, D., & Sikström, S. (2014). The dark side of Facebook: Semantic representations of status updates predict the Dark Triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 67(0), 92-96. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.10.001

Gosling, D., Augustine, A., Vazire, S., Holtzman, N., & Gaddis, S. (2011). Manifestation of personality in online social networks: Self-reported facebook-related behaviors and observable profile information. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking., 14, 483-488.

Gunawan, D. D., & Huarng, K.-H. (2015). Viral effects of social network and media on consumers’ purchase intention. Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2237-2241. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.004

Hall, J. A., & Pennington, N. (2013). Self-monitoring, honesty, and cue use on Facebook: The relationship with user extraversion and conscientiousness. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1556-1564. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.001

John, Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (Producer). (1991). The Big Five Inventory--Versions 4a and 54.

John, Naumann, L., & Soto, C. (2008). Paradigm Shift to the Integrative Big Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Conceptual Issues. In O. John, R. Robbins & L. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 114-156): Guilford.

Kask, J., & Linton, G. (2013). Business mating: when start-ups get it right. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 26(5), 511-536. doi: 10.1080/08276331.2013.876765

Katz, E. (1959). Mass Communications Research and the Study of Popular Culture: An Editorial Note on a Possible Future for This Journal. Studies in Public Communication, 2, 1-6.

Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., Schmeck, R. R., & Avdic, A. (2011). The Big Five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 472-477. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.019

Mas-Verdú, F., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Roig-Tierno, N. (2015). Firm survival: The role of incubators and business characteristics. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 793-796. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.030

McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An Introduction to the Five-Factor Model and Its Applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175-215. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x

Moore, K., & McElroy, J. C. (2012). The influence of personality on Facebook usage, wall postings, and regret. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 267-274. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.009

Mozas-Moral, A., Bernal-Jurado, E., Medina-Viruel, M. J., & Fernández-Uclés, D. (2016). Factors for success in online social networks: An fsQCA approach. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5261-5264.

Nadkarni, A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 243-249. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007

O’Connor, M. C., & Paunonen, S. V. (2007). Big Five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 971-990. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.017

Pappas, I. O., Kourouthanassis, P. E., Giannakos, M. N., & Chrissikopoulos, V. (2015). Explaining online shopping behavior with fsQCA: The role of cognitive and affective perceptions. Journal of Business Research. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.010

Plaisant, O., Guertault, J., Courtois, R., Réveillère, C., Mendelsohn, G. A., & John, O. P. (2010). Histoire des « Big Five » : OCEAN des cinq grands facteurs de la personnalité. Introduction du Big Five Inventory français ou BFI-Fr. Annales Médico-psychologiques, revue psychiatrique, 168(7), 481-486. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amp.2009.04.016

Ragin. (2006). Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage. Political Analysis, 14(3), 291-310.

Ragin, & Fiss, P. (2008). Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: An empirical demonstration. Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond, 190-212.

Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 578-586. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.024

Ryan, T., & Xenos, S. (2011). Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1658-1664. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004

Sedghi, A. (2014). Facebook: 10 years of social networking, in numbers. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2014/feb/04/facebook-in-numbers-statistics

Seidman, G. (2013). Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: How personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(3), 402-407. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.009

Smith, M. M., Saklofske, D. H., & Nordstokke, D. W. (2014). The link between neuroticism and perfectionistic concerns: The mediating effect of trait emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 61–62(0), 97-100. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.013

Stevenson, I. (2013). Does technology have an impact on learning? A Fuzzy Set Analysis of historical data on the role of digital repertoires in shaping the outcomes of classroom pedagogy. Computers & Education, 69, 148-158. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.010

Tan, W., Yang, C. (2012). Personality Traits Predictors of Usage of Internet Services. Paper presented at the International Conference on Economics, Business Innovation, Singapore.

Thygeson, N. M., Peikes, D., & Zutshi, A. (2013). Mixed Methods: Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Configurational Comparative Methods: Powerful Methods to Study and Refine Patient-Centered Medical Home Models. . Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Vecchione, M., Schoen, H., Castro, J. L. G., Cieciuch, J., Pavlopoulos, V., & Caprara, G. V. (2011). Personality correlates of party preference: The Big Five in five big European countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(6), 737-742. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.015

Vis, B. (2012). The comparative advantages of fsQCA and regression analysis for moderately large-N analyses. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(1), 168-198.

Wu, C.-W. (2015). Foreign tourists' intentions in visiting leisure farms. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 757-762. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.024

Yadav, M. S., de Valck, K., Hennig-Thurau, T., Hoffman, D. L., & Spann, M. (2013). Social Commerce: A Contingency Framework for Assessing Marketing Potential. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(4), 311-323. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.001

Yilmaz, C., Varnali, K., & Kasnakoglu, B. T. How do firms benefit from customer complaints? Journal of Business Research. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.08.038

Zschoch, M. A. (2011). Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, Rihoux Benoit and Ragin Charles, eds., Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications, 2009, pp. xxv, 209. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 44(3), 743-746.

Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., Joireman, J., Teta, P., & Kraft, M. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: The Big Three, the Big Five, and the Alternative Five. Journal of personality and social psychology, 65(4), 757.

Zywica, J., & Danowski, J. (2008). The Faces of Facebookers: Investigating Social Enhancement and Social Compensation Hypotheses; Predicting Facebook™ and Offline Popularity from Sociability and Self-Esteem, and Mapping the Meanings of Popularity with Semantic Networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(1), 1-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.01429.x