Hameed, Shahzad and Wei, Wei and Farrukh, Umer and Mushtaq, Khali (2019): Switching to Hydropower renewable energy to mitigate the effects of the carbon emissions in South and East Asian economies.
PDF
MPRA_paper_90435.pdf Download (694kB) |
Abstract
Energy is the most essential tool for production and distribution of economic goods. It is also considered as crucial input of economic development. The World Energy Committee states that there are several environmental risks linked to energy production from non-renewable sources such as coal, gas, and petroleum etc. One of the associated risks is high per capita carbon emissions. To reduce such risk economy should switch to the renewable energy sources that characterize less or no carbon emission. This paper investigated the dynamics of coal, gas and hydroelectric energy within the framework of the environmental Kuznets curve. The study used the Arellano and Bond (1991) dynamic panel model using the GMM framework developed by the Hansen (1982). The empirical results of the study confirm the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis and that coal and gas are significant contributors to carbon. Results suggest that the hydel energy can play an essential role in mitigating the carbon emissions and improving climate emissions in case of South and East Asian Countries.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Switching to Hydropower renewable energy to mitigate the effects of the carbon emissions in South and East Asian economies |
English Title: | Switching to Hydropower renewable energy to mitigate the effects of the carbon emissions in South and East Asian economies |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Environmental Kuznets curve; Renewable energy; Non-renewable energy; CO2 emissions; Arellano-Bond dynamic panel-data. |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q43 - Energy and the Macroeconomy Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 90435 |
Depositing User: | Shahzad Shahzad Hameed |
Date Deposited: | 02 Feb 2019 21:04 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 14:10 |
References: | 1. Arellano, & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, pp. 277-297. 2. Areliano , M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics , pp. 29-51. 3. Azomahou, T., Laisney, F., Phu, N.V. (2006). Economic development and CO2 emissions: a nonparametric panel approach, Journal of Public Economics 90, 1347–1363. 4. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, pp.115-143. 5. Carson R. T. (2010). Environmental Kuznets Curve: Searching for Empirical Regularity and Theoretical Structure, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 4, 3-23. 6. Cole M. A., Rayner A. J. and J. M. Bates, (1997).The Environmental Kuznets Curve: An Empirical Analysis, Environment and Development Economics 2, 401-416. 7. Coondoo, D., Dinda, S. (2008). The carbon dioxide emission and income: a temporal analysis of cross-country distributional patterns," Ecological Economics 65, 375–385. 8. Galeotti, M., Lanza, A., Pauli, F. (2006). Reassessing the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emission: a robustness exercise, Ecological Economics 57, 152–163, 2006. 9. Grossman, G., & Krueger, A. (1991). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 3914. 10. Holtz-Eakin D. and T. M. Selden, (1995). Stoking the Fires? CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth," Journal of Public Economics 57, 85-101. 11. Iddrisu, I., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2015). Sustainable Energy Development Index: A multi-dimensional indicator for measuring sustainable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, pp. 513-530. 12. Kouakou, A. (2011). Economic growth and electricity consumption in Cote d'Ivoire: Evidence from time series analysis. Energy Policy, pp. 3638-3644. 13. Kraft, J., Kraft, A. (1978). On the relationship between energy and GNP," Journal of Energy Development 3, 401–403, 1978. 14. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality," The American Economic Review, pp. 1-28. 15. Lorente, B. D., & Álvarez-Herranz, A. (2016). Economic growth and energy regulation in the environmental Kuznets curve. Environ Sci Pollut Res, pp. 16478–16494. 16. Managi, S., Jena, P. R. (2008). Environmental productivity and Kuznets curve in India, Ecological Economics 65, 432–440. 17. Melenberg, I., Tassielli, G., Notarnicola, B. (2009). Global warming agreements, international trade and energy/carbon embodiments: an input-output approach to the Italian case, Energy Policy 34, 88–100. 18. Narayan, P.K., Narayan, S., Smyth, R., (2008). Are oil shocks permanent or temporary? Panel data evidence from crude oil and NGL production in 60 countries, Energy Economics 30(3), 919–936. 19. Narayan, P.K., Singh, B. (2007). The electricity consumption and GDP nexus for the Fiji Islands," Energy Economics 29, 1141–1150. 20. Ozokcu, S., & Ozdemirb, O. (2017). Economic growth, energy, and environmental Kuznets curve. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, pp. 639–647. 21. Pao, H.T., Fu, H.C., 2013. (2013). Renewable energy, non-renewable energy and economic growth in Brazil, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 25, 381–392. 22. Payne, J. E. (2009). On the dynamics of energy consumption and output in the US, Applied Energy 86,575–577. 23. Perman R. and D. I. Stern, (2003). Evidence from Panel Unit Root and Cointegration Tests that the Environmental Kuznets Curve Does Not Exist, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 47, 325-347. 24. Roca, J., Padilla, E., Farré, M., Galletto, V. (2001). Economic growth and atmospheric pollution in Spain: discussion the environmental Kuznets next term hypothesis, Ecological Economics 39, 85–99. 25. Sari, R., Ewing, B.T., Soytas, U. (2008). The relationship between disaggregate energy consumption and industrial production in the United States: An ARDL approach," Energy Economics 30, 2302–2313. 26. Sasana, H., Setiawan, A. H., Ariyanti, F., & Ghozali, I. (2017). The Effect Of Energy Subsidy On The Environmental Quality In Indonesia. International Journal Of Energy Economics And Policy, Vol 7, No 5. 27. Sadorsky, P. (2009). Renewable energy consumption and income in emerging economies. Energy Policy, pp. 4021-4028. 28. Shafik, N. (1994). Economic Development and Environmental Quality: An Econometric Analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, pp. 757-773. 29. Shahbaz, M., Lean, H. H., & Shabbir, M. S. (2012). Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis in Pakistan: Cointegration and Granger causality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, pp. 2947–2953. 30. Shahbaz, M., Mutascu, M., & Azim, P. (2013). Environmental Kuznets curve in Romania and the role of energy consumption. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, pp. 165-173. 31. Selden T. M. and D. Song, "Environmental Quality and Development: Is there a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution?" Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27, 147-162, 1994. 32. Tiwari , A. K., Shahbaz, M., and Adnan Hye, Q. M. (2013). The environmental Kuznets curve and the role of coal consumption in India: Cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, pp. 519–527. 33. Wagner M. (2008). The Carbon Kuznets Curve: A Cloudy Picture Emitted by Bad Econometrics?, Resource and Energy Economics 30, 388-408. 34. Wolde-Rufael , Y. (2010). Coal consumption and economic growth revisited. Applied Energy, pp. 160–7. 35. Yildirim, E., Aslan, A. (2012). Energy consumption and economic growth nexus for 17 highly developed OECD countries: further evidence based on bootstrap-corrected causality tests, Energy Policy 51, 985–993. 36. Yildirim, E., Sarac, S., Aslan, A. (2012). Energy consumption and economic growth in the USA: evidence from renewable energy, Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews 16, 6770–6774. 37. York, R., Rosa, E.A., Dietz, T. (2003). Stirpat, Ipat And Impact: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental next term impacts, Ecological Economics 46, 351–365. 38. Wolde-Rufael , Y. (2010). Coal consumption and economic growth revisited. Applied Energy, pp. 160–7. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/90435 |