Moderate innovator trap – Does convergence of innovative potential occur?

Rybacki, Jakub and Kowalski, Arkadiusz Michał (2018): Moderate innovator trap – Does convergence of innovative potential occur?

Abstract

Based on β and σ convergence analysis, we find high persistence of technological gap for international innovation indices reported by the European Commission. Our research confirms the diverging scientific potential across the analyzed economies. On the other hand, estimation provides the evidence of convergence in case of R&D expenses and relative position on global technological frontier. We propose a simple fixed effect panel regression measuring relative innovativeness potential. Our model suggests that current ranking leaders i.e. Nordic countries (Sweden, Denmark and Finland) and Germany are likely to further outpace the United States. Central and Eastern Europe countries are achieving greatest relative gains, but are unlikely to exceed 70% of US potential. Peripheral Europe countries, South Africa, Turkey and Russia are projected to further lose innovativeness position, despite weaker initial position.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: β convergence, σ convergence, European Innovation Scoreboard, moderate innovators.
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes

References

Altuzarra A. (2010), “Convergence in the Innovative Performance of the European Union Countries”. Transition Studies Review, Vol.17, Iss.1, pp. 22-38.

Andrews, D., Criscuolo, C., & Gal, P. (2015). Frontier firms, technology diffusion and public policy: micro evidence from OECD countries (Vol. 2). OECD Publishing.

Archibugi, D., & Filippetti, A. (2011). Is the economic crisis impairing convergence in innovation performance across Europe? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(6), 1153-1182.

Arrighi, G., Silver, B. J., & Brewer, B. D. (2003). Industrial convergence, globalization, and the persistence of the North-South divide. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(1), 3.

Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of political Economy, 100(2), 223-251.

Crespo, N., & Fontoura, M. P. (2007). Determinant factors of FDI spillovers–what do we really know? World development, 35(3), 410-425.

Cameron, G., Proudman, J., & Redding, S. (2005). Technological convergence, R&D, trade and productivity growth. European Economic Review, 49(3), 775-807.

Cohen and Levinthal, D. (1990), Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 123–33.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (2000). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. In Strategic Learning in a Knowledge economy (pp. 39-67).

Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2005). Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues. Technology in society, 27(2), 133-153.

Eichengreen, B., Park, D., & Shin, K. (2013). Growth slowdowns redux: New evidence on the middle-income trap (No. w18673). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Fleming, L., King III, C., & Juda, A. I. (2007). Small worlds and regional innovation. Organization Science, 18(6), 938-954.

Fu, X., Pietrobelli, C., & Soete, L. (2011). The role of foreign technology and indigenous innovation in the emerging economies: technological change and catching-up. World development, 39(7), 1204-1212.

Fu, X., & Gong, Y. (2011). Indigenous and foreign innovation efforts and drivers of technological upgrading: evidence from China. World development, 39(7), 1213-1225.

Glass, A. J., & Saggi, K. (1998). International technology transfer and the technology gap. Journal of development economics, 55(2), 369-398.

Griffith, R., Redding, S., & Van Reenen, J. (2003). R&D and absorptive capacity: theory and empirical evidence. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 105(1), 99-118.

Hölzl, Werner and Friesenbichler, Klaus, High-Growth Firms, Innovation and the Distance to the Frontier (April 13, 2010). Economics Bulletin, 30(2), pp 1016-1024,

Iacovone, L., & Crespi, G. A. (2010). Catching up with the technological frontier: Micro-level evidence on growth and convergence. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(6), 2073-2096.

Kijek, T., & Matras-Bolibok, A. (2018). Innovativeness of European Regional Space: Convergence Or Divergence? Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, 59.

Kharas, H., & Kohli, H. (2011). What is the middle income trap, why do countries fall into it, and how can it be avoided? Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, 3(3), 281-289.

Klinger, B., & Lederman, D. (2009). Diversification, innovation, and imitation of the global technological frontier. Breaking Into New Markets: Emerging Lessons for Export Diversification, 101-10.

Magone, J. M., Laffan, B., & Schweiger, C. (2016). Core-periphery relations in the European Union: power and conflict in a dualist political economy. Routledge.

Maurseth, P. B., & Verspagen, B. (2002). Knowledge spillovers in Europe: a patent citations analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104(4), 531-545.

Quah, D. (1993). Galton's fallacy and tests of the convergence hypothesis. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 427-443.