Xu, Jing (2015): 媒体关注能影响上市公司现金股利支付吗?.
PDF
MPRA_paper_91334.pdf Download (655kB) |
Abstract
Over last ten years, the media has gradually been playing an irreplaceable role in economic society. As efficient means of improving insufficient judicial protection, media plays an important role in disseminating public information, restraining the government’s behavior, shaping corporate policy and relieving the market failure. In China, the media has reported a series of scandals such as “the Sanlu Poisonous milk powder incident” and the “Shuanghui cleanbuteral incident” caused by corporate illegal behavior, indicating that the media can effectively expose the corporate violations. For this reason, many researchers in China began to research the effect of the media attention on the function of corporate governance. The researchers find that media attention can effectively shape firms’ information environment, improve managers’ behavior and promote Chinese listed enterprises to fulfill their social responsibilities. Moreover, extensive media coverage will increase the auditors’ concerns about the audit failure and lower their level of tolerance in audit risks, resulting in an increase of the audit fees. In a word, all these studies have shown that the media make significant contributions to improving corporate governance. However, there are few studies regarding the relation between media attention and cash dividend policy. It still remains unclear that whether media as an important information intermediary can influence firms’ dividend policy. Therefore, this paper investigates the association between the media attention and the cash dividend policy of Chinese listed firms from 2003- 2012 by using Logit model and Tobit model. The author also uses an instrumental approach and an exogenous shock as well to deal with the endogenous problem, In addition, the paper uses OLS regression to verify the relation between the media attention and the market reaction to the cash dividend announcement of the Chinese listed firms. Results from the empirical tests in this paper suggest that: (1) Media attention can significantly improve the firms’ propensity to pay cash dividend; (2) Media attention can significantly enhance the market reaction to cash dividend payment. The findings suggest that the media helps protect shareholders’ interests and reduce the information problem around dividend announcement. Innovation of this paper is mainly as follows: (1) Though a large number of studies have discussed factors contributing to cash dividend policy, few of them have studied whether the media could have an effect on making cash dividend decisions. As a result, this paper provides new evidence on the related study of dividend theories; (2) Foreign researchers find that cash dividend announcement can bring significant abnormal stock returns. However, most studies have shown that this is not obvious in Chinese capital market. The reason why the results of the Chinese studies in this field are not consistent with those of related foreign studies still needs further research. A possible explanation could be that the samples used in the previous Chinese research were not divided into groups according to firms’ different characteristics, which made the significance of the regression for the whole samples smoothed away. Therefore in this paper, the author investigates how market reactions differently to cash dividend announcements of firms with different levels of media coverage ; (3) In order to address the concern caused by endogeneity , the paper uses an instrumental variable and a natural environment ,which is rarely mentioned in past research concerned with media attention.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | 媒体关注能影响上市公司现金股利支付吗? |
English Title: | Can media attention affect corporate cash dividend policy? |
Language: | Chinese |
Keywords: | Media Attention; Cash Dividend; Market Reaction; Corporate Governance |
Subjects: | G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G35 - Payout Policy |
Item ID: | 91334 |
Depositing User: | miss Jing Xu |
Date Deposited: | 15 Jan 2019 15:01 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 22:15 |
References: | [1]陈浪南、姚正春:《中国股利政策信号传递作用的实证研究》,《金融研究》2000年第10期。 [2]陈红、杨鑫瑶、尹树森:《媒体评价、声誉治理和投资者权益保护》,《中南财经政法大学学报》2014年第1期。 [3]陈信元、陈东华、时旭:《公司治理与现金股利:基于佛山照明的案例研究》,《管理世界》2003年第8期。 [4]邓建兰、顾乃康、陈辉:《上市公司现金股利受再融资监管政策的驱动吗?》,《山西财经大学学报》2014年第7期。 [5]邓路、王珊珊、杨德勇:《现金流不确定性与现金股利公告的信号传递效应》,《财贸经济》2011年第2期。 [6]孔东明、刘莎莎、应千伟:《公司行为中的媒体角色:激浊扬清还是推波助澜?》,《管理世界》2013年第7期。 [7]陆正飞、王春飞、王鹏:《激进股利政策的影响因素及其经济后果》,《金融研究》2010年第6期。 [8]吕长江、王克敏:《上市公司股利政策的实证分析》,1999年《经济研究》第12期。 [9]吕长江、周县华:《公司治理机构与股利分配动机—基于代理成本和利益侵占的分析》,《南开管理评论》2005年第8期。 [10]吕明康、冉明东:《媒体报道影响审计师专业判断吗?—基于盈余管理风险判断视角的实证分析》,《审计研究》2012年第6期。 [11]李礼、王舒曼、齐寅峰:《股利政策由谁决定及其选择动因》,《金融研究》2006年第1期。 [12]李培功、沈艺峰:《媒体的公司治理作用:中国的经验证据》,《经济研究》2011年第4期。 [13]廖理、方芳:《股利政策代理理论的实证检验》,《南开管理评论》2005年第5期。 [14]邓康林、刘名旭:《环境不确定性、财务柔性与上市公司现金股利》,《财经科学》2013年第2期。 [15]邓建平、曾勇:《上市公司控制与股利政策研究》,《管理世界》2005年第7期。 [16]邓建平、曾勇、何佳:《利益获取:股利共享还是资金独占》,2007年《经济研究》第4期。 [17]雷光勇、刘慧龙:《市场化进程、最终控制人性质与现金股利行为—来自中国A股公司的经验数据》,2007年《管理世界》第7期。 [18]李永梅:《上市公司现金股利政策研究—基于柳工持续派现的分析》,2014年《财会通讯》第3期。 [19]罗进辉:《媒体报道的公司治理作用-双重代理成本视角》,《金融研究》2012年第10期。 [20]刘峰、叶强、李一军:《媒体关注与投资者关注对股票收益的交互作用:基于中国金融股的实证研究》,《管理科学学报》2014年第1期。 [21]马曙光、黄志忠、薛云奎:《股权分置、资金侵占与上市公司现金股利政策》,《会计研究》2005年第9期。 [22]权小峰、吴世农:《媒体关注的治理效应及其治理机制研究》,《财贸经济》2012年第5期。 [23]饶育蕾、彭叠峰、成大超:《媒体注意力会引起股票的异常收益吗?—来自中国股票市场的经验证据》,《系统工程理论与实践》2010年第2期。 [24]冉明东、贺跃:《媒体关注、制度环境与审计收费》,《中南财经政法大学学报》2014年第3期。 [25]宋佳、陈名芹:《半强制分红、现金股利与公司成长性》,《财会月刊》2014年第4期。 [26]王茂林、何玉润、林慧婷:《管理层权力、现金股利与公司投资效率》,《南开管理评论》2014年第2期。 [27]魏志华、吴育辉、李常青:《家族控制、双重委托代理冲突与现金股利政策—基于中国上市公司的实证研究》,2012年金融研究第7期。 [28]于忠泊、田高良、齐保垒:《媒体关注的公司治理机制—基于盈余管理视角的考察》,《管理世界》2012年第9期。 [29]俞乔、程莹:《中国公司红利政策与股市波动》,《经济研究》2001年第4期。 [30]袁天荣、苏红亮:《上市公司超能力派现的实证研究》,《会计研究》2004年第10期。 [31]王信:《从代理理论看上市公司的派现行为》,《金融研究》2002年第9期。 [32]熊德华、刘力:《股利支付决策与迎合理论—基于中国上市公司的实证研究》,《经济科学》2007年第5期。 [33]熊艳、李常青、魏志华:《媒体报道与IPO定价效率:基于信息不对称与行为金融视角》,《世界经济》2014年第5期。 [34]祝继高、王春飞:《金融危机对公司现金股利政策的影响研究—基于股权结构的视角》,《会计研究》2013年第2期。 [35]张纯、吕伟:《信息环境、融资约束与现金股利》,《金融研究》2009年第7期。 [36]张雅慧、方笛昉、付雷鸣:《基于投资者关注的媒体报道影响投资者行为的实验研究》,《系统工程》,2012年第10期。 [37]郑志刚、丁冬、汪昌云:《媒体的负面报道、经理人声誉与公司业绩改善—来自我国上市公司的证据》,《金融研究》2011年第12期。 [38]Alon.Kalay, Dividend payouts and information shocks, Journal of Accounting Research, 2014(2). [39]Baixiao Liu, John J.Mconnell. The Role of the Media in Corporate Governance: Do the Media influence Manager’s Capital Allocation Decisions?, Journal of Financial Economies,2013. [40]Berry TD. Howe K M. Public information arrival. Journal of Finance,1994,49(4). [41]Brain J., John E. The role of the Business Press as an Information Intermediary, Journal of Accounting Research, 2009,(1) . [42]Chay. J. B., AND J. Suh. Payout Policy and Cash-Flow Uncertainty, Journal of Financial Economics,2009,93,(1). [43]Brav. A, JR Gooham, C.R.Harvey. Payout Policy in the 21st Century, Journal of Financial Economics,2005,77,(3). [44]Chen Lin, Yue Ma, Paul Malatesta and Yuhai Xuan. Corporate Ownership Structure and Bank Loan Syndicate Structure, Journal of Financial Economies , 2011(10) [45]Dyck A., L.Zingales, The Corporate Governance Role of the Media, The Right to Tell: The Role of Mass Media in Economic Development, Washington D.C.: World Bank,2002. [46]Dyck A., N.Volchkova ,and L.Zingales, The Corporate Governance Role of the Media: Evidence from Russia, The Journal of Finance,2008(3). [47]Fang L H, Peress J. Media Coverage and the Cross-Section of Stocks Returns. The Journal of Finance,2009,64,(5). [48]Hirshleifer D, Teoh SH. Limited Attention, Information Disclosure and Financia Reporting, Journal of Accounting and Economics,2003(36). [49]Jensen M.C.,and W.H.Meckling, Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency costs and Capital Structure, Journal of Financial Economics,1976(4). [50]La Porta R,F., Lopez-de-Silanes,A.Shleifer and R.Vishny, Agency problems and Dividend Policies Around the World, Journal of Finance,2000. [51]Lee Pinkowitz, Rene Stulz and Rolan Williamson. Does the Contribution of Corporate Cash Holdings and Dividends to Firm Value Depend on Governance? A Cross-Country Analysis, The Journal of Finance, 2006(6). [52]Merton R C. A sample model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. The Journal of Finance,1987,42(3). [53]Mickel K.Bednar, Watchdog or Lapdog? A Behavioral View of the Media as a Corporate Governance Mechanism, Academy of Management Journal,2012(55). [54]Mitchell ML, Mulherin JH. The Impact of Public Information on the Stock Market. Journal of Finance,1994,49(3). [55]Miller G.S, The press as a Watchdog for Accounting Fraud, Journal of Accounting Research,2006(3). [56]Miller M H, Rock K, Dividend policy under asymmetric information, The Journal of Finance,1985. [57]Omar Farooq, Media Independence and Dividend Policy: Evidence From Emerging Stock Markets, The Journal of Applied Business Research, 2012(28). [58]Wei G, and J.Z.Xiao, Equity Ownership Segregation, Shareholder Preferences, and Dividend Policy in China, The British Accounting Review,2009,41,(3). [59]Zucker H G, The variable nature of news media influence, Communication Yearbook 1978(2). |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/91334 |