Does Marginal Productivity Mean Anything in Real Economic Life?

Jael, Paul (2019): Does Marginal Productivity Mean Anything in Real Economic Life?

Abstract

The equality between factor pay and marginal product is a major component of the neoclassical paradigm. The paper begins with a brief historical review of this principle. Follows a questioning about the relevance of this law as an argument in the social debates: does marginal product represent the very contribution of the agent and if so, is it a legitimate reference for the setting of remuneration? Our answer to the first part of the question is irresolute; to the second, it is negative.

But most of the article is devoted to analysing the economic realism of the said law, both empirically and theoretically. We review some statistical studies present in the literature, with particular attention for the debate regarding the regressions of Cobb and Douglas. Evidence does not strengthen the neoclassical law of retribution.

The paper analyses the factors that hinder either the determinateness of marginal product or the equalisation between it and factor's remuneration. Are analysed: - the restrictions inherent in the law of marginal productivity: constant returns to scale and perfect competition - an alternative explanation of interest: the Austrian theory - incentive wage theories: efficiency wage and tournament theory.

The article then considers the particular case of the CEO's remuneration.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: marginal productivity; income distribution; wage; interest; profit; production function
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B21 - Microeconomics; D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D33 - Factor Income Distribution

References

Bellou, Andriana and Barıs Kaymak (2011) Real Wage Growth over the Business Cycle: Contractual versus Spot Markets https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268340490_Real_Wage_Growth_over_the_Business_Cycle_Contractual_versus_Spot_Markets

Carneiro, Anabela and Paulo Guimarães and Pedro Portugal, (2009), Real Wages and the Business Cycle: Accounting for Worker and Firm Heterogeneity IZA DP No. 4174, May 2009. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227355285_Real_Wages_and_the_Business_Cycle_Accounting_for_Worker_Firm_and_Job_Title_Heterogeneity

Clark John Bates (1895) «Real Issues concerning Interest» in The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol 10 n°1, pp. 98-102.

Clark, John Bates (1908) The Distribution of Wealth: a Theory of Wages, Interest and Profits, Macmillan, New York. Site Internet Library of Economics and Liberty http://www.econlib.org/library/Clark/clkDW.html

Cobb, C. W. and P. H. Douglas, (1928) “A Theory of Production”. American Economic Review, December 1928, pp.139-65.

Douglas, Paul H (1976) “The Cobb-Douglas Production Function Once Again: Its History, Its Testing, and Some Empirical Values”. Journal of Political Economy, October 1976, pp.903-915.

Du Caju, Philip, François Rycx and Ilan Tojerow (2009), Inter-Industry Wage Differentials: How Much Does Rent Sharing Matter? European Central Bank, Working Paper Series no 1103 / October 2009

Edgeworth Francis Ysidro (1925) ”The Theory of Distribution” in Papers relating to Political Economy, Macmillan and co, London, vol 1, pp. 13-60.

Felipe, Jesus and F. Gerard Adams (2005) “The Estimation of the Cobb-Douglas Function: A Retrospective View”, Eastern Economic Journal, Vol. 31, No. 3, Summer 2005 pp 427-445

Gottschalk, P. (1978), “A Comparison of Marginal Productivity and Earnings by Occupation”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 31(3), pp. 368-378.

Gottschalk, P. and J. Tinbergen, (1982), “Methodological Issues in Testing the Marginal Productivity Theory”, De Economist, 130(3), pp. 325-335

Hobson, J.A. (1910) The Industrial System, Charles Scribner's sons, New York

Kampelmann, Stephan and François Rycx “Wages of Occupations in Theory... and Practice”, Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique 2011/4 (Tome L), pp. 119-131

Knight, Frank H. (1923) «The Ethics of Competition», The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol 38 n°3, pp. 579-624.

Lazear, E. and S. Rosen, (1981), “Rank-order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts”, Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), pp. 841-864

Marshall, Alfred (1920), Principles of Economics. Macmillan and Co London

Mayer, Gerald (2018), Does the Theory of Marginal Productivity Apply to CEOs? March 15, 2018. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3141945

Pareto, Vilfredo (1897), Cours d’économie politique, tome second, F. Rouge, Lausanne

Pigou, A.C. (1932) The Economics of Welfare, Macmillan and Co Ltd, London.

Robinson, Joan (1946) The Economics of Imperfect Competition, Macmillan and co ldt, London

Samuelson, Paul A. (1966) Foundations of Economic Analysis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge

Shapiro Carl and Joseph E. Stiglitz (1984) “Unemployment Equilibrium as a Worker Discipline Device”, American Economic Review, vol 74 n°3, pp. 433-444.

Shorter, G. and M. Labonte, (2007), The Economics of Corporate Executive Pay. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/key_workplace/674

Simon, H. and F. A Levy, (1963) “Note on the Cobb-Douglas Function”. Review of Economic Studies, June 1963, pp.93-94.

Stiglitz Joseph E. (2001) «Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics» in Nobel Prize in Economics documents, Nobel Prize Comittee, 2001-8, pp. 472-540. https://nobelprize.org/nobelprizes/economic-sciences/laureates/2001/stiglitz-lecture.pdf

Van Biesebroeck, Johannes (2015) “How tight is the link between wages and productivity? A survey of the literature”, International Labour Organization 2015 Conditions of Work and Employment Series No. 54

Wicksell, Knut (1934) Lectures on Political Economy volume I , Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd, London

Wicksteed Philip H. (1932) An Essay on the Co-ordination of Laws of Distribution, London School of Economics, Scarce Tracts of Economic and Political Science: Reprint n°12.