Eliasson, Jonas and Fosgerau, Mogens (2019): Cost-benefit analysis of transport improvements in the presence of spillovers, matching and an income tax. Forthcoming in: Economics of Transportation
This is the latest version of this item.
PDF
MPRA_paper_92289.pdf Download (1MB) |
Abstract
This paper addresses the problem of measuring the welfare benefits of a transport improvement. We formulate and analyze a rich spatial model that allows for spillovers, matching and income tax, in a setting with multiple work and residential locations and very general worker heterogeneity. The conventional consumer surplus captures part of the benefits and is calculated based on predictions of changes in travel demand and transport costs. The issue is to determine which so-called wider impacts to add to this. We find that adding the change in total output as a wider impact leads to double-counting of benefits. The output change due to spillovers should be added, while the output change due to matching is already partly included in the consumer surplus. These results are useful for applied cost-benefit analysis of transport policies.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Cost-benefit analysis of transport improvements in the presence of spillovers, matching and an income tax |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Agglomeration; spillovers; matching; cost-benefit analysis; transport policy |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics |
Item ID: | 92289 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Mogens Fosgerau |
Date Deposited: | 24 Feb 2019 08:05 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 17:42 |
References: | Anderstig, C., Berglund, S., Eliasson, J., & Andersson, M. (2016). Congestion charges and labour market imperfections. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 50(2), 113–131. Bastian, A., Börjesson, M., & Eliasson, J. (2016). Explaining “peak car” with economic variables. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 88, 236–250. Börjesson, M., & Eliasson, J. (2014). Experiences from the Swedish Value of Time study. Transportation Research Part A, 59, 144–158. Börjesson, M., Isacsson, G., Andersson, M., & Anderstig, C. (2015). The impact of accessibility on labour earnings ( No. 2015:18). CTS Working Paper. Centre for Transport Studies, KTH, Stockholm. Calthrop, E., De Borger, B., & Proost, S. (2010). Cost-benefit analysis of transport investments in distorted economies. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 44(7), 850–869. Carra, G., Mulalic, I., Fosgerau, M., & Barthelemy, M. (2016). Modelling the relation between income and commuting distance. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 13(119), 20160306. Ciccone, A. (2002). Agglomeration effects in Europe. European Economic Review, 46(2), 213–227. Ciccone, A., & Hall, R. E. (1996). Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 4313. Combes, P.-P., Duranton, G., & Gobillon, L. (2008). Spatial wage disparities: Sorting matters! Journal of Urban Economics, 63(2), 723–742. Combes, P.-P., & Gobillon, L. (2014). The Empirics of Agglomeration Economies (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2503404). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Costa, D. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2000). Power Couples: Changes in the Locational Choice of the College Educated, 1940–1990. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1287–1315. de Jong, G., & Gunn, H. (2001). Recent Evidence on Car Cost and Time Elasticities of Travel Demand in Europe. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 35(2), 137–160. Department for Transport. (2017). TAG unit A2.4: Appraisal of productivity impacts ( No. A2.4). Transport Analysis Guidance. UK Department for Transport. Diamond, P. A., & Mirrlees, J. A. (1971). Optimal taxation and public production I: Production efficiency. The American Economic Review, 61(1), 8–27. Drèze, J., & Stern, N. (1987). The theory of cost-benefit analysis. In A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (Eds.), Handbook of Public Economics. North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2004). Chapter 48 Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In J. Vernon Henderson and Jacques-François Thisse (Ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics (Vol. 4, pp. 2063–2117). Elsevier. Forsyth, P. J. (1980). The Value of Time in an Economy with Taxation. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 14(3), 337. Fosgerau, M., McFadden, D., & Bierlaire, M. (2013). Choice probability generating functions. Journal of Choice Modelling, 8, 1–18. Gan, L., & Li, Q. (2016). Efficiency of thin and thick markets. Journal of Econometrics, 192(1), 40–54. Graham, D. J. (2007a). Agglomeration, productivity and transport investment. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 41(3), 317–343. Graham, D. J. (2007b). Variable returns to agglomeration and the effect of road traffic congestion. Journal of Urban Economics, 62(1), 103–120. Graham, D. J., Melo, P. S., Jiwattanakulpaisarn, P., & Noland, R. B. (2010). Testing for Causality Between Productivity and Agglomeration Economies. Journal of Regional Science, 50(5), 935–951. Graham, D. J., & van Dender, K. (2011). Estimating the agglomeration benefits of transport investments: some tests for stability. Transportation, 38(3), 409–426. Harberger, A. C. (1971). Three basic postulates for applied welfare economics: An interpretive essay. Journal of Economic literature, 9(3), 785–797. Jara-Díaz, S. R. (1986). On the Relation Between Users’ Benefits and the Economic Effects of Transportation Activities. Journal of Regional Science, 26(2), 379–391. Kanemoto, Y. (2013a). Second-best cost–benefit analysis in monopolistic competition models of urban agglomeration. Journal of Urban Economics, 76, 83–92. Kanemoto, Y. (2013b). Evaluating benefits of transportation in models of new economic geography. Economics of Transportation, 2(2–3), 53–62. Kidokoro, Y. (2004). Cost-Benefit Analysis for Transport Networks: Theory and Application. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 38(2), 275–307. Kidokoro, Y. (2006). Benefit estimation of transport projects—a representative consumer approach. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 40(7), 521–542. Kidokoro, Y. (2015). Cost–Benefit Analysis for Transport Projects in an Agglomeration Economy. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP), 49(3), 454–474. Maré, D. C., & Graham, D. J. (2013). Agglomeration elasticities and firm heterogeneity. Journal of Urban Economics, 75, 44–56. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd. McFadden, D. (1981). Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice. In C. F. Manski & D. McFadden (Eds.), Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications (pp. 198–272). Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press. Melo, P. C., & Graham, D. J. (2014). Testing for labour pooling as a source of agglomeration economies: Evidence for labour markets in England and Wales. Papers in Regional Science, 93(1), 31–52. Mohring, H. (1993). Maximizing, measuring, and not double counting transportation-improvement benefits: A primer on closed- and open-economy cost-benefit analysis. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 27(6), 413–424. Norman, T., Börjesson, M., & Anderstig, C. (2017). Labor market accessibility and unemployment. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy. Ottaviano, G., & Thisse, J.-F. (2004). Chapter 58 - Agglomeration and Economic Geography. In J. V. H. and J.-F. Thisse (Ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Cities and Geography (Vol. 4, pp. 2563–2608). Elsevier. Pilegaard, N., & Fosgerau, M. (2008). Cost Benefit Analysis of a Transport Improvement in the Case of Search Unemployment. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 42, 23–42. Puga, D. (2010). The Magnitude and Causes of Agglomeration Economies*. Journal of Regional Science, 50(1), 203–219. Rice, P., Venables, A. J., & Patacchini, E. (2006). Spatial determinants of productivity: Analysis for the regions of Great Britain. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36(6), 727–752. Rosenthal, S. S., & Strange, W. C. (2004). Chapter 49 Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. In J. Vernon Henderson and Jacques-François Thisse (Ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics (Vol. Volume 4, pp. 2119–2171). Elsevier. SACTRA. (1999). Transport and the Economy, Standing Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Assessment. London. Small, K. A., & Van Dender, K. (2007). Fuel Efficiency and Motor Vehicle Travel: The Declining Rebound Effect. The Energy Journal, 28(1), 25–51. Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Methuen & Co., Ltd. Starrett, D. (1978). Market allocations of location choice in a model with free mobility. Journal of Economic Theory, 17(1), 21–37. Venables, A. J. (2007). Evaluating Urban Transport Improvements: Cost-Benefit Analysis in the Presence of Agglomeration and Income Taxation. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 41(2), 173–188. Worsley, T. (2011). The evolution of London’s crossrail scheme and the development of the department for transport’s economic appraisal methods ( No. 2011–27). ITF Roundtable Discussion Papers. Paris: International Transport Forum. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/92289 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Cost-benefit analysis of transport improvements in the presence of spillovers, matching and an income tax. (deposited 02 Feb 2017 12:01)
- Cost-benefit analysis of transport improvements in the presence of spillovers, matching and an income tax. (deposited 24 Feb 2019 08:05) [Currently Displayed]