Miroudot, Sébastien and Ye, Ming (2010): Investigating double counting terms in the value-added decomposition of gross exports.
PDF
MPRA_paper_93936.pdf Download (319kB) |
Abstract
In the input-output framework, the concept of ‘double counting’ comes from the measurement of intermediate inputs. Output is equal to (domestic) value-added plus intermediate inputs. But intermediate inputs are also produced with (domestic or foreign) value-added and other intermediate inputs. Double counting terms can be regarded as a subset of intermediate inputs in output decomposition. When it comes to value-added in exports, there is no consensus yet on the definition of double counting terms. Some authors, such as Koopman et al. (2014), Nagengast and Stehrer (2016) and Borin and Mancini (2017) propose to base the definition on the number of international border crossings. Also, Los and Timmer (2018) point out that the double counted domestic value-added is the sum of the bilateral domestic value-added across all partners minus the unilateral one (i.e. with partner world). Moreover, they indicate that the allocation of value-added to gross flows is ‘arbitrary’. Alternatively, Miroudot and Ye (2018) rely on a supply-side input-output model. In their framework, double counting terms can be measured by the second and later input rounds in the generation of value-added in exported goods using the Ghosh decomposition. In this paper, we investigate more closely the concept of ‘double counting’ in the decomposition of gross exports. First, we show that while domestic value-added can be indeed ‘double counted’ in the domestic content of exports, the concept of foreign double counting is more complicated and does not always imply value-added counted twice from the point of view of the exporting economy. When talking about ‘double counting’ in gross exports, it is important to distinguish the global level (world) from the country level. We provide separate frameworks and introduce different terms based on the global-consistency and country-consistency of the decomposition in order to shed light on the distribution of GDP in the global/country export flows. We thus clarify the meaning of double counting terms in the different decompositions of gross exports.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Investigating double counting terms in the value-added decomposition of gross exports |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Trade accounting,input-output table, Value-added decomposition, Global value chains, double counting |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D57 - Input-Output Tables and Analysis E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General > E01 - Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth ; Environmental Accounts E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E16 - Social Accounting Matrix F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade |
Item ID: | 93936 |
Depositing User: | Dr Ming Ye |
Date Deposited: | 16 May 2019 13:22 |
Last Modified: | 05 Oct 2019 19:23 |
References: | Borin, Alessandro, and Michele Mancini. 2017. “Follow the Value Added: Tracking Bilateral Relations in Global Value Chains.” MPRA Paper, No. 82692. Daudin, Guillaume, Christine Rifflart, and Danielle Schweisguth. 2011. “Who Produces for Whom in the World Economy?” Canadian Journal of Economics 44 (4): 1403–37. Foster-McGregor, Neil, and Robert Stehrer. 2013. “Value Added Content of Trade: A Comprehensive Approach.” Economics Letters 120 (2): 354–357. Gereffi, Gary, and Karina Fernandez-Stark. 2016. Global Value Chain Analysis: A Primer. 2nd edition. Duke Center on Globalization, Governance and Competitiveness. Johnson, Robert C. 2018. “Measuring Global Value Chains.” Annual Review of Economics 10: 207–236. Johnson, Robert C., and Guillermo Noguera. 2012. “Accounting for Intermediates: Production Sharing and Trade in Value Added.” Journal of International Economics 86 (2): 224–36. Koopman, Robert, Zhi Wang, and Shang-Jin Wei. 2014. “Tracing Value-added and Double Counting in Gross Exports.” American Economic Review 104 (2): 459–94. Leontief, Wassily. 1936. “Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic System of the United States.” The Review of Economic and Statistics 18: 105–25. Los, Bart, Marcel P. Timmer, and Gaaitzen J. de Vries. 2016. “Tracing value-added and double counting in gross exports: Comment.” American Economic Review 107 (7): 1958–1966. Los, Bart and Marcel P. Timmer.2018. “Measuring Bilateral Exports of Value Added: A Unified Framework.” NBER Working paper, No. 24896. Miroudot, Sébastien, and Ming Ye. 2017. “Decomposition of Value-Added in Gross Exports: Unresolved Issues and Possible Solutions.” MPRA Paper, No. 83273. Nagengast, Arne J., and Robert Stehrer. 2016. “Accounting for the Differences Between Gross and Value Added Trade Balances.” The World Economy 39 (9): 1276–1306. Timmer, Marcel P., Erik Dietzenbacher, Bart Los, Robert Stehrer, and Gaaitzen J. de Vries. 2015. “An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input–Output Database: the Case of Global Automotive Production.” Review of International Economics 23: 575–605. Trefler, Daniel, and Susan Chun Zhu. 2010. “The Structure of Factor Content Predictions.” Journal of International Economics 82 (2): 195–207. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/93936 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Investigating double counting terms in the value-added decomposition of gross exports. (deposited 14 May 2019 11:36)
- Investigating double counting terms in the value-added decomposition of gross exports. (deposited 16 May 2019 13:22) [Currently Displayed]