Biswas, Pradip and Verma, Jyotiprakash and Pohit, Sanjib (2018): India’s Biodiesel Programme: A Pathway for Sustainable Entrepreneurship, Employment Generation and Inclusiveness.
PDF
MPRA_paper_94719.pdf Download (781kB) |
Abstract
The biodiesel programme introduced by the Government of India in the beginning of this century represents a unique case of the development of numerous sustainable entrepreneurs, substantial employment generation for the poor and reduction of carbon footprints without compromising food security and thus promote equity and social justice. It is estimated that a 20% biofuel blending through domestic feedstock production would create 6.37 million sustainable entrepreneurs and185.15 million man-days per year by 2020. Given the availability of wasteland in the country this target is achievable. The two most important factors that restrained the success of the programme are the uncertainties in yield and seed prices for the farmers. As the domestic price of petroleum is linked to global crude price, any decline in the price of crude in the world market would reduce the feedstock prices in the local market. It therefore requires fixing minimum support prices for seeds and stabilizing yield at higher level through R&D. Given all this potential benefits and the recent trend of jobless growth in the country the programme deserves to be implemented more vigorously.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | India’s Biodiesel Programme: A Pathway for Sustainable Entrepreneurship, Employment Generation and Inclusiveness |
English Title: | India’s Biodiesel Programme: A Pathway for Sustainable Entrepreneurship, Employment Generation and Inclusiveness |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Biodiesel, Entrepreneurship, Jatropha, Employment, Marginal farmers |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q20 - General Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q21 - Demand and Supply ; Prices Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q29 - Other |
Item ID: | 94719 |
Depositing User: | Professor Sanjib Pohit |
Date Deposited: | 27 Jun 2019 09:31 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 01:10 |
References: | 1. Biswas PK, Pohit Sanjib, Kumar R. Biodiesel from jatropha: Can India meet the 20% blending target? Energy Policy, 2010, vol. 38, pp. 1477–1484. 2. Pohit S, Biswas PK. India’s Biodiesel Programme: Status, Prospects, and Shortcomings. In: Chandel AK, Sukumaran RK, editors. Sustainable Biofuels Development in India. Springer International; 2017. ISBN 978-3-319-50217-5. 3. TERI. Liquid Biofuels for Transportation: India country study on potential and implications for sustainable agriculture and energy. The Energy and Resources Institute. New Delhi: 2005. 4. (The WIRE, dated, 28.07.2016) 5. (counterview.org, dated, 05.10.2016) 6. Shah SH, Raja IA, Rizwan M, Rashid N, Mahmood Q, Shah FA, Pervez A. Potential of microalgal biodiesel production and its sustainability perspectives in Pakistan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2018, vol. 81, pp. 76–92. 7. Abila N. Biofuels adoption in Nigeria: a preliminary review of feedstock and fuel production potentials. Manag Environ Qual Int J 2010, vol. 21, pp. 785–95. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1108/14777831011077646. 8. Sulle E, Nelson F. Biofuels, land access and rural livelihoods in Tanzania. IIED, London, UK, 2009. 9. Timko JA, Amsalu A, Acheampong E, Teferi MK. Local Perceptions about the Effects of Jatropha (Jatropha curcas) and Castor (Ricinus communis) Plantations on Households in Ghana and Ethiopia. Sustainability 2014, vol. 6, pp. 7224-7241. 10. Pradhan A, Mbohwa C. Development of biofuels in South Africa: challenges and opportunities. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2014, vol. 39, pp. 1089–100. 11. Jingura RM, Matengaifa R, Musademba D, Musiyiwa K. Characterisation of land types and agro-ecological conditions for production of Jatropha as a feedstock for biofuels in Zimbabwe. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, vol. 35, pp. 2080–2086. 12. Skutsch M, de los Rios E, Solis S, Riegelhaupt E, Hinojosa D, Gerfert S, Gao Y, Masera O. Jatropha in Mexico: Environmental and social impacts of an incipient biofuel program. Ecol Soc 2011, vol. 16, pp. 11. doi:10.5751/ES-04448-160411. 13. Hockerts K, Wüstenhagen R. Greening Goliaths versus emerging Davids - Theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in Sustainable Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing 2010, vol. 25, pp. 481-492.9 14. Gladwin T, Kennelly J, Krause T. Shifting paradigms for sustainable development. Academy of Management Review 1995, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 874-907. 15. Choi D, Gray E. The venture development process of “sustainable” entrepreneurs. Management Research News 2008, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 558-569. 16. Hall JK, Daneke GA, Lenox MJ. Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing 2010, vol. 25, pp. 439-488. 17. Crals E, Vereeck L. The affordability of sustainable entrepreneurship certification for SMEs. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 2005, vol. 12, pp. 173-183. 18. Pohit S, Biswas PK, Kumar R, Jha J. International experiences of ethanol as transport fuel: Policy Implications for India. Energy Policy 2009, vol. 37, pp. 4540–4548. 19. Pohit S, Biswas PK, Ashra S. Incentive structure of India’s biofuel programs: status, shortcomings and implications. Biofuels 2011, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1-15. 20. Verheul I, Wennekers S, Audretsch D, Thurik AR. An eclectic theory of entrepreneurship: policies, institutions and culture. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper: TI 2001-030/3: 2001. 21. Wennekers ARM, Thurik AR. Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics 1999, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 27-55. 22. IEA (International Energy Agency). India Energy Outlook -World Energy Outlook Special Report 2015. https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/IndiaEnergyOutlook_WEO2015.pdf (accessed on 10.09.2017) 23. Pohit S, Biswas PK, Kumar R, Goswami A. Pricing model for biodiesel feedstock: A case study of Chhattisgarh in India. Energy Policy 2010, vol. 38, pp. 7487–7496. 24. Live Mint. Tariffs for world’s biggest solar power plant hit all-time low of Rs2.97/unit. Feb 11, 2017. 25. Obidzinski, K., R. Andriani, H. Komarudin, and A. Andrianto. Environmental and social impacts of oil palm plantations and their implications for biofuel production in Indonesia. Ecology and Society 2012, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 25. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04775-170125 Pal K, Yadav P, Tyagi SK. Renewable Sources in India and Their Applications. In: Chandel AK, Sukumaran RK, editors. Sustainable Biofuels Development in India. New Delhi: Springer International; 2017. ISBN 978-3-319-50217-5. Storey DJ. The birth of new firms - does unemployment matter? A review of the evidence. Small Business Economics 1991, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 167-178. Storey DJ. Understanding the Small Business Sector. Rutledge: London/New York, 1994. ISBN 0415100380 TERI. Liquid Biofuels for Transportation: India country study on potential and implications for sustainable agriculture and energy. The Energy and Resources Institute. New Delhi., 2005. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/94719 |