Pasche, Markus (2019): Fridays for Future meets the Hotelling rule: some thoughts on decarbonization policies.
PDF
MPRA_paper_94803.pdf Download (207kB) |
Abstract
The Hotelling rule is applied to the case of a fixed CO2 budget restriction which has to be met in order to reach the global warming goal according to the Paris Agreement. While the theoretical result is well-known and simple, the practical implementation under technological uncertainty suggests that tradable emission certificates are superior to CO2 taxes. The practical implementaion has also to consider that production chains are globalized, and that decarbonization strategies will be pointless if the Global South is not part of it.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Fridays for Future meets the Hotelling rule: some thoughts on decarbonization policies |
English Title: | Fridays for Future meets the Hotelling rule: some thoughts on decarbonization policies |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | climate change; CO2 reduction, Hotelling rule, CO2 taxes, emission trading system, globalization |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q30 - General Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q37 - Issues in International Trade Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q38 - Government Policy Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 94803 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Markus Pasche |
Date Deposited: | 04 Jul 2019 06:25 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 16:44 |
References: | Bergstrom, J.C. (2016), Resource Economics. An Economic Approach to Natural Resource and Environmental Policy, 4th ed. Edward Elgar. Busch, J. (2015), Climate Change and Development in Three Charts. Center for Gllobal Development. https://www.cgdev.org/ Clò, S. (2010), Grandfathering, auctioning and Carbon Leakage: Assessing the inconsistencies of the new ETS Directive. Energy Policy 38 (5), 2420-2430. Edenhofer, O., Schmidt, C. M. (2018), Eckpunkte einer CO2-Preisreform. RWI Position #72, 1. Dezember 2018 Hotelling, H. (1931), The Economics of Exhaustible Resources. Journal of Political Economy 39 (2), 137-175. Mehling, M., van Asselt, H., Das, K., Droege, S., Verkuijl, C. (2017), Designing Border Carbon Adjustments for Enhanced Climate Action. Climate Strategies. Pasinetti, L., Scazzieri, R. (1987), Capital Theory: Paradoxes. In: The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, London and New York. Porter, M.E., van der Linde, C. (1995), Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4), 97-118. World Bank, Ecofys (2016), Carbon Pricing Watch 2016 (May), Washington, DC. Xepapadeas, A. (2015), Economic Growth and the Environment. In: Handbook of Environmental Economics, Volume 3. Edited by K. G. Mäler and J.R. Vincent. Elsevier. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/94803 |