Consistent and inconsistent choices under uncertainty: The role of cognitive abilities

Amador, Luis and Brañas-Garza, Pablo and Espín, Antonio M. and Garcia, Teresa and Hernández, Ana (2019): Consistent and inconsistent choices under uncertainty: The role of cognitive abilities.

Abstract

There is an intense debate whether decision making under uncertainty is partially driven by cognitive abilities. The critical issue is whether choices arising from subjects with lower cognitive abilities are more likely driven by errors or lack of understanding than pure preferences for risk. The latter implies that the often argued link between risk preferences and cognitive abilities might be a spurious correlation. This experiment reports evidence from a sample of 556 participants who made choices in risk-related tasks about winning and losing money and completed three cognitive tasks, all with real monetary incentives: number-additions under time pressure (including incentive-compatible expected number of correct additions), the Cognitive Refection Test (to measure analytical/reflective thinking) and the Remote Associates Test (for convergent thinking). Results are unambiguous: none of our cognition measures plays any systematic role on risky decision making. Our data indeed suggest that cognitive abilities are negatively associated with noisy, inconsistent choices, which might have led to spurious correlations with risk preferences in previous studies.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: decision making under uncertainty, cognitive abilities, online experiment
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

References

Åkerlund, D., Golsteyn, B.H., Grönqvist, H. andLindahl, L. (2016). Time discounting and criminal behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(22): 6160–6165.

Anderhub, V., Müller, R. and Schmidt, C. (2001). Design and evaluation of an economic experiment via the Internet. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 46(2): 227–247.

Andersson, O., Holm, H. J., Tyran, J. R. andWengström, E. (2016).Risk Aversion Relates to Cognitive Ability: Preferences or Noise? Journal of the European Economic Association 14(5): 1129–1154.

Angrisani M. and Casanova, M.(2011). Understanding Heterogeneity in Household Portfolios: The Role of Cognitive Ability and Preference Parameters. Mimeo USC.

Angrisani M. and Casanova, M. (2018). Portfolio Allocations of Older Americans: The Role of Cognitive Ability and Preference Parameters. Mimeo USC.

Arechar, A. A., Gächter, S. and Molleman, L. (2018). Conducting interactive experiments online. Experimental Economics 21(1): 99–131.

Beauchamp, J. P., Benjamin, D. J. and Chabris, C. F. (2012). How Malleable are Risk Preferences and Loss Aversion? Mimeo USC.

Beauchamp, J. P.,·Cesarini, D. and·Johannesson, M. (2017). The psychometric and empirical properties of measures of risk preferences. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 54(3): 203–237.

Benjamin, D. J., Brown, S. A. and Shapiro, J. M. (2013).Who is Behavioral? Cognitive Ability and Anomalous Preferences. Journal of the European Economic Association 11(6): 1231–1255.

Berns, G. S., Capra, C. M., Chappelow, J., Moore, S., Noussair, C. (2008). Nonlinear neurobiological probability weighting functions for aversive outcomes, Neuroimage 39(4): 2047–2057.

Bickel, W. K., Odum, A. L. and Madden, G. J. (1999). Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology 146(4): 447–454.

Booth, A. I. and Katic, P. (2013). Cognitive Skills, Gender and Risk Preferences. Economic Record 89(284): 19–30.

Booth, A., Cardona-Sosa, L. and Nolen, P. (2014). Gender Differences in Risk Aversion: Do Single-Sex Environments Affect Their Development? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 99: 126–54.

Bosch-Domènech, A., Brañas-Garza, P. and Espín, A. M. (2014). Can exposure to prenatal sex hormones (2D: 4D) predict cognitive reflection? Psychoneuroendocrinology 43: 1–10.

Brañas-Garza, P., Guillen, P., Lopez, R. (2008). Math skills and risk attitudes. Economics Letters 99(2): 332–36.

Brañas-Garza, P., and Rustichini A. (2011). Organizing effects of testosterone and economic behavior: Not just risk taking. PLoS ONE 6(12): e29842.

Brañas-Garza, P., Kujal, P. and Lenkei, B. (2015). Cognitive Reflection Test: Whom, how, when. Munich Repository 68049.

Burks, S. V., Carpenter, J. P., Goette, L. and Rustichini, A. (2009). Cognitive Skills Affect Economic Preferences, Strategic Behavior, and Job Attachment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(19): 7745–50.

Campitelli, G. and Labollita, M. (2010). Correlations of cognitive reflection with judgments and choices. Judgment and Decision Making 5(3): 182–91.

Capraro, V., Corgnet, B., Espín, A. M. and Hernán-González, R. (2017). Deliberation favours social efficiency by making people disregard their relative shares: evidence from USA and India. Royal Society Open Science 4(2): 160605.

Chapman, J.,Snowberg, E., Wang, S. and Camerer. C. (2018). Loss Attitudes in the U.S. Population: Evidence from Dynamically Optimized Sequential Experimentation (DOSE). NBER Working Paper 25072.

Charness, G., Gneezy, U. and Imas, A. (2013). Experimental methods: Eliciting risk preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 87: 43–51.

Charness, G., Gneezy, U., and Halladay, B. (2016). Experimental methods: Pay one or pay all. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 131(Part A): 141–150.

Christelis, D., Jappelli, T. and Padula, M. (2010). Cognitive Abilities and Portfolio Choice. European Economic Review 54(1):18–38.

Cokely, E. T. and Kelley, C. M. (2009). Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation. Judgment and Decision Making 4(1): 20–33.

Cole, S., Paulson, A. and Shastry, G. K. (2014). Smart Money? The Effect of Education on Financial Outcomes. The Review of Financial Studies 27(7): 2022–2051.

Corgnet, B., Espín, A. M. and Hernán-González, R. (2016). Creativity and cognitive skills among millennials: thinking too much and creating too little. Frontiers in psychology 7: 1626.

Cueva, C., Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I., Mata-Pérez, E., Ponti, G., Sartarelli, M., Yu,H. and Zhukova, V. (2015). Cognitive (ir)reflection: New experimental evidence. Journal of Behavioral & Experimental Economics 64: 81–93.

Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D. and Sunde, U. (2010). Are Risk Aversion and Impatience Related to Cognitive Ability? The American Economic Review 100(3): 1238–1260.

Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D. and Sunde, U. (2018).On the Relationship between Cognitive Ability and Risk Preference. Journal of Economic Perspectives 32(2): 115–134.

Eckel, C. C. and Grossman, P. J. (2002). Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(4): 281–295.

Falk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T., Enke, B., Huffman, D. and Sunde, U. (2018). Global Evidence on Economic Preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 133(4): 1645–1692.

Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(4): 25–42.

Frisell, T., Pawitan, Y. and Långström, N. (2012). Is the Association Between General Cognitive Ability and Violent Crime Caused by Family-Level Confounders? PloS ONE 7(7): e41783.

Gächter, S., Johnson, E. J. and Herrmann, A. (2007). Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices. IZA Discussion Paper 2961.

Grinblatt, M., Keloharju, M. and Linnainmaa, J.(2011). IQ and Stock Market Participation. The Journal of Finance 66(6): 2121–64.

Holt, C. A. and Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects. The American Economic Review 92(5): 1644–1655.

Horton, J. J., Rand, D. G. and Zeckhauser, R. J. (2011). The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics 14(3): 399–425.

Lilleholt, L. (2019). Cognitive ability and risk aversion: A systematic review and meta analysis. Judgment and Decision Making 14(3): 234–279.

Mandal, B. and Roe, B. E. (2014). Risk tolerance among National Longitudinal Survey of Youth participants: The effects of age and cognitive skills. Economica, 81(323): 522–543.

Mather, M., Mazar, N., Gorlick, M. A., Lighthall, N. R., Burgeno, J., Schoeke, A. and Ariely, D. (2012). Risk Preferences and Aging: The “Certainty Effect” in Older Adults´ Decision Making. Psychology and Aging 27(4): 801–16.

Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review 69(3): 220–32.

Meier, S. and Sprenger, C. D. (2012). Time discounting predicts creditworthiness. Psychological Science 23(1): 56–58.

Niederle, M. and Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(3): 1067–1101.

Oechssler, J., Roider, A. and Schmitz, P. W. (2009). Cognitive abilities and behavioral biases. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 72(1): 147–52.

Pachur, T., Mata, R. and Hertwig, R. (2017). Who Dares, Who Errs? Disentangling Cognitive and Motivational Roots of Age Differences in Decisions Under Risk. Psychological Science 28(4): 504–518.

Park, N. Y. (2016). Domain-specific risk preference and cognitive ability. Economics Letters 141: 1–4.

Rustichini, A., DeYoung, C. G., Anderson, J. and Burks, S. V. (2016). Toward the Integration of Personality Theory and Decision Theory in Explaining Economic Behavior: An Experimental Investigation. Journal of Behavioral & Experimental Economics 64: 122-37.

Shen, W., Hommel, B., Yuan, Y., Chang, L. and Zhang, W. (2018). Risk-taking and creativity: Convergent, but not divergent thinking is better in low-risk takers. Creativity Research Journal 30(2): 224–231.

Sousa, S. (2010). Are Smarter People Really Less Risk Averse? CeDEx Discussion Paper Series 2010-17.

Sutter, M., Kocher, M. G., Glätzle-Rützler, D. and Trautmann, S. T. (2013). Impatience and Uncertainty: Experimental Decisions Predict Adolescents' Field Behavior. The American Economic Review 103(1): 510–531.

Taylor, M. P. (2013). Bias and brains: Risk aversion and cognitive ability across real and hypothetical settings. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 46(3): 299–320.

Taylor, M. P. (2016). Are High-Ability Individuals Really More Tolerant of Risk? A Test of the Relationship Between Risk Aversion and Cognitive Ability. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 63: 136–147.

Toplak, M. E., West, R. F. and Stanovich, K. E. (2014). Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test. Thinking and Reasoning 20(2): 147–168.

Tymula, A., Rosenberg-Belmaker, L. A., Roy, A. K., Ruderman, L., Manson, K., Glimcher, P. W. and Levy, I. (2012). Adolescents' risk-taking behavior is driven by tolerance to ambiguity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(42): 17135–17140.

Van Rooij, M., Lusardi, A. and Alessie, R. (2011). Financial Literacy and Stock Market Participation. Journal of Financial Economics 101(2): 449–472.