A preliminary test on risk and ambiguity attitudes, and time preferences in decisions under uncertainty: towards a better explanation of participation in crop insurance schemes

Coletta, Attilio and Giampietri, Elisa and Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano and Severini, Simone and Trestini, Samuele (2018): A preliminary test on risk and ambiguity attitudes, and time preferences in decisions under uncertainty: towards a better explanation of participation in crop insurance schemes. Forthcoming in: Bio-Based and Applied Economics No. 3

Abstract

The exposure of farmers to different (and increasing) risks has been recognized by the EU policy, which supports several risk management tools through the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Despite the vulnerability of the agricultural sector, and the attention paid at the EU level, the uptake of such tools is generally low across EU countries. The Italian case is emblematic: the uptake of subsidized crop insurance contracts is low, limited to few products, and concentrated in few areas. Coherently, the interest of policy makers toward explaining these characteristics and in gaining insights on the interventions that may help promoting participation is intense. This contribution investigates behavioral aspects linked to choices under risk and ambiguity, and account for time preferences in order to mimic the scenario faced by the potential adopters of the subsidized crop insurance contracts in Italy. Data are collected through questionnaires submitted to students from agricultural colleges in three administrative regions located in northern, central and southern Italy. Results show that attitude toward risk, ambiguity, and impatience are correlated with the intrinsic characteristics of respondents. In addition, some of those attitudes may help explaining decisions under uncertainty. Despite the empirical analysis is preliminary and focused on students, it allowed to validate a promising methodological approach capable of explaining farmer’s willingness to adopt (or renew) insurance contracts. By accounting for (currently under-investigated) behavioral aspects, it is likely to prove useful to re-design or implementing, more effectively, the current policies.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Insurance; subjective probabilities; risk preferences; choice experiment
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q12 - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q18 - Agricultural Policy ; Food Policy

References

Cubitt, R., Van De Kuilen, G. and Mukerji, S. (2019). Discriminating Between Models of Ambiguity Attitude: A Qualitative Test. Journal of the European Economic Association.

Enjolras, G. and Sentis, P. (2011). Crop Insurance Policies and Purchases in France. Agricultural Economics 42(4): 475-486.

European Commission (2009). Income Variability and Potential Cost of Income Insurance for EU. AGRI L.1/L.3/ D (2009). Brussels.

European Commission (2017). Risk Management Schemes in EU Agriculture Dealing with Risk and Volatility. Eu Agricultural Markets Briefs No 12, September 2017. Brussels.

Farrin, K., Miranda, M.J. and O’Donoghue, E. (2016). How Do Time and Money Affect Agricultural Insurance Uptake? A New Approach to Farm Risk Management Analysis. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service No. 212.

Finger, R. and Lehmann, N. (2012). The Influence of Direct Payments on Farmers’ Hail Insurance Decisions. Agricultural Economics 43(3): 343-354.

Franken, J.R.V., Pennings, J.M.E. and Garcia, P. (2017). Risk Attitudes and the Structure of Decision-Making: Evidence from the Illinois Hog Industry. Agricultural Economics 48(1): 41-50.

Goldstein, D.G., Johnson, E.J. and Sharpe, W.F. (2008). Choosing Outcomes Versus Choosing Products: Consumer-Focused Retirement Investment Advice. Journal of Consumer Research 35(3): 440-456.

Holt, C.A. and Laury, S.K. (2002). Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects. American Economic Review 92(5): 1644-1655.

ISMEA (2018). Rapporto sulla Gestione del Rischio in Italia: Stato dell’ARTE e Scenari Evolutivi per la Stabilizzazione dei Redditi in Agricoltura. Roma: Romana Editrice.

Liesivaara, P. and Myyrä, S. (2017). The Demand for Public-Private Crop Insurance and Government Disaster Relief. Journal of Policy Modeling 39(1): 19-34.

Menapace, L., Colson, G. and Raffaelli, R. (2015). A Comparison of Hypothetical Risk Attitude Elicitation Instruments for Explaining Farmer Crop Insurance Purchases.

European Review of Agricultural Economics 43(1): 113-135. Nielsen, T., Keil, A. and Zeller, M. (2013). Assessing Farmers’ Risk Preferences and their Determinants in a Marginal Upland Area of Vietnam: A Comparison of Multiple Elicitation Techniques. Agricultural Economics 44(3): 255-273.

Ogurtsov, V.A., van Asseldonk, M.A. and Huirne, R.B. (2009). Purchase of Catastrophe Insurance by Dutch Dairy and Arable Farmers. Review of Agricultural Economics 31(1): 143-162.

Santeramo, F.G. (2018). Imperfect Information and Participation in Insurance Markets: Evidence from Italy. Agricultural Finance Review 78(2): 183-194.

Santeramo, F.G. (2019). I Learn, you Learn, we Gain: Experience in Crop Insurance Markets. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 41(2): 284-304.

Santeramo, F.G., Goodwin, B.K., Adinolfi, F. and Capitanio, F. (2016). Farmer Participation, Entry and Exit Decisions in the Italian Crop Insurance Program. Journal of Agricultural Economics 67(3): 639-657.

Severini, S., Biagini, L. and Finger, R. (2018). Modeling Agricultural Risk Management Policies – The Implementation of the Income Stabilization Tool in Italy. Journal of Policy Modeling 41(1): 140–155.

Severini, S., Tantari, A. and Di Tommaso, G. (2017). Effect of Agricultural Policy on Income and Revenue Risks in Italian Farms. Implications for the Upload of Risk Management Policies. Agricultural Finance Review 77(2): 295-311.

Sutter, M., Kocher, M.G., Glätzle-Rüetzler, D. and Trautmann, S.T. (2013). Impatience and Uncertainty: Experimental Decisions Predict Adolescents' Field Behavior. American Economic Review 103(1): 510-31.

Trestini, S., Giampietri, E. and Boatto, V. (2017). Toward the Implementation of the Income Stabilization Tool: An Analysis of Factors Affecting the Probability of Farm Income Losses in Italy. New Medit 16(4): 24-30.

Trestini, S., Szathvary, S., Pomarici, E. and Boatto, V. (2018). Assessing the Risk Profile of Dairy Farms: Application of the Income Stabilisation Tool in Italy. Agricultural Finance Review 78(2): 195-208.

van Winsen, F., de Mey, Y., Lauwers, L., Van Passel, S., Vancauteren, M. and Wauters, E. (2016). Determinants of Risk Behavior: Effects of Perceived Risks and Risk Attitude on Farmer’s Adoption of Risk Management Strategies. Journal of Risk Research 19(1): 56-78.

Wąs, A. and Kobus, P. (2018). Factors Differentiating the Level of Crop Insurance at Polish Farms. Agricultural Finance Review 78(2): 209-222.