Frolov, Daniil (2019): From institutions to extitutions to the post-institutional theory of institutional anomalies.
PDF
MPRA_paper_95960.pdf Download (1MB) |
Abstract
The paper proposes to abandon the one-sidedly negative interpretation of institutional anomalies (non-optimal, inefficient, dysfunctional institutions) and rethink them as the main products and manifestations of institutional complexity. The concept of extitutions is introduced, which are understood as models of social order that go beyond the bounds of institutions and are based on variations of norms. The extitutional interpretation of the nature of institutional anomalies allows a critical review of the traditionally associated dichotomies (e.g. opposition of ideal and dysfunctional, inclusive and extractive institutions), analytical approaches (functionalist, mechanistic, isolationist, static, etc.) and stereotypes (e.g. assessment of institutions from the standpoint of public interests, “presumption of guilt” of interest groups, stigmatization of hybrid institutional trajectories, etc.). The article proposed a set of conceptual shifts towards increasing the objectivity and realism of the analysis of institutional anomalies in line with the research program of post-institutionalism.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | From institutions to extitutions to the post-institutional theory of institutional anomalies |
English Title: | From institutions to extitutions to the post-institutional theory of institutional anomalies |
Language: | Russian |
Keywords: | institutions; extitutions; inefficient institutions; institutional traps; institutional failures; institutional complexity; institutional anomalies; post-institutionalism |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B52 - Institutional ; Evolutionary |
Item ID: | 95960 |
Depositing User: | Mr Daniil Frolov |
Date Deposited: | 11 Sep 2019 17:35 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 06:46 |
References: | Ang, Y. Y. (2016). How China Escaped the Poverty Trap. London: Cornell University Press. Argyres, N. S. and Liebeskind, J. P. (1999). Contractual commitments, bargaining power, and governance nonseparability: Incorporating history into transaction cost theory // Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 49-63. Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events // The Economic Journal, 99(394), 116-131. Baker, D. (2018). Is Intellectual Property the Root of All Evil? Patents, Copyrights, and Inequality. Paper presented at The Great Polarization: Economics, Institutions and Policies in the Age of Inequality conference, University of Utah, Department of Economics, September 27-29, 2018 (http://cepr.net/images/stories/reports/ip-2018-10.pdf). Baker, P. H. and Ausink, J. A. (1996). State collapse and ethnic violence: toward a predictive model // Parameters, 26(1), 19-31. Baleriola, E. et al. (2016). Nuevas formas de habitar la ciudad: hacia una conceptualización de la ciudadanía biovigilante / Baleriola, E., Tirado, F., Maureira, M. and Torrejón, P. // Fractal: Revista de Psicologia, 28(2), 172-180. Barnett, M. N. and Finnemore, M. (1999). The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations // International Organization, 53(4), 699-732. Bassi, N. (2016). Implications of Institutional Vacuum in Wetland Conservation for Water Management // IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 5(1), 41-50. Bator, F. M. (1958). The Anatomy of Market Failure // The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72(3), 351-379. Baudry, B. and Chassagnon, V. (2010). The Close Relation Between Organization Theory and Oliver Williamson’s Transaction Cost Economics: a Theory of the Firm Perspective // Journal of Institutional Economics, 6(4), 477-503. Beaumont, P. B. and Harris, R. I. D. (1994). The institutional vacuum in British industrial relations // Policy Studies, 15(4), 50-59. Bello, W. F. (2013). Review: Why «Why Nations Fail» is Not in the Same League as «The Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy» // Philippine Sociological Review, 61(1), 251-257. Borzel, T. A. and Risse, T. (2016). Dysfunctional state institutions, trust, and governance in areas of limited statehood // Regulation & Governance, 10(2), 149-160. Bridges, M. (2018). Extractive Practices in «Inclusive» States: Power and Poverty in the USA. London: London School of Economics. Canguilhem, G. (1991). The Normal and the Pathological. New York: Zone Books. Carment, D. (2003). Assessing State Failure: implications for theory and policy // Third World Quarterly, 24(3), 407-427. Casey, A. J. and Sawicki, A. (2017). The Problem of Creative Collaboration // William and Mary Law Review, 58(6), 1793-1850. Cestino, J. and Berndt, A. (2017). Institutional limits to service dominant logic and servitisation in innovation efforts in newspapers // Journal of Media Business Studies, 14(3), 188-216. Chang, H.-J. (2011). Institutions and economic development: theory, policy and history // Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(4), 473-498. Chipkin, I., Swilling, M. et al. (2018). Shadow State: The Politics of State Capture. Johannesburg: Wits University Press. Cleaver, F. (2012). Development through Bricolage: Rethinking Institutions for Natural Resources Management. New York: Routledge. Cohen, B. and Winn, M. I. (2007). Market Imperfections, Opportunity and Sustainable Entrepreneurship // Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29-49. Collet-Sabe, J. (2013). From total institution to extitution? Discussions on the future of monastic life in the Benedictine women’s monasteries of Catalonia (Spain) // Revista Internacional de Sociología, 71(2), 335-356. David P.A. (2007) Path Dependence: a Foundational Concept for Historical Social Science // Cliometrica, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 91-114. David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY // American Economic Review, 75(2), 332-337. De Jong, M., Lalenis, K. and Mamadouh, V. (Eds.) (2002). The Theory and Practice of Institutional Transplantation: Experiences with the Transfer of Policy Institutions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Delbridge, R. and Edwards, T. (2013). Inhabiting Institutions: Critical Realist Refinements to Understanding Institutional Complexity and Change // Organization Studies, 34(7), 927-947. Demsetz, H. (1969). Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint // Journal of Law and Economics, 12(1), 1-22. Dequech, D. (2013). Economic institutions: explanations for conformity and room for deviation // Journal of Institutional Economics, 9(1), 81-108. Dobusch, L. and Kapeller, J. (2013). Breaking New Paths: Theory and Method in Path Dependence Research // Schmalenbach Business Review, 65(3), 288-311. Foldenyi L. (2016). Melancholy. New Haven; London: Yale University Press. Furton, G. and Martin, A. (2019). Beyond Market Failure and Government Failure // Public Choice, 178(1-2), 197-216. Gatete, C. and Dabat, M.-H. (2017). From the fuel versus food controversy to the institutional vacuum in biofuel policies: Evidence from West African countries // Energy, Sustainability and Society, 7(12), 1-16. Gradstein, M. (2008). Institutional Traps and Economic Growth // International Economic Review, 49(3), 1043-1066. Hellman, J. S., Jones, G. and Kaufmann, D. (2003). Seize the state, seize the day: State capture and influence in transition economies // Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(4), 751-773. Helmholz, R. H. (2016). The Myth of Magna Carta Revisited // North Carolina Law Review, 94(5), 1475-1493. Henly, S. J., Wyman, J. F. and Gaugler, J. E. (2011). Health trajectory research: a call to action for nursing science // Nursing Research, 60(3), 79-82. Herington, M. J. and van de Fliert, E. (2018). Positive Deviance in Theory and Practice: A Conceptual Review // Deviant Behavior, 39(5), 664-678. Hillebrand, B., Driessen, P. H. and Koll, O. (2015). Stakeholder marketing: theoretical foundations and required capabilities // Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(4), 411-428. Huysmans, J. (2016). Democratic curiosity in times of surveillance // European Journal of International Security, 1(1), 73-93. Jamali, D. and Karam, S. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries as an Emerging Field of Study // International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 32-61. Johnson, B. and Lundvall, B.-А. (1992). Closing the institutional gap? // Revue d'économie industrielle, 59, 111-123. Katz, L. (2018). Dark Dreams and Malign Creativity. Knowledge Cultures, 6(2), 64-75. Khan, M. (1995). State Failure in Weak States: A Critique of New Institutionalist Explanations. In: Harriss, J., Hunter, J., Lewis, C. (Eds.). The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development. London: Routledge, 71-86. Klimina, A. (2009). Toward an Evolutionary-Institutionalist Concept of State Capture: The Relevance of Kaleckian Analysis of Non-Equilibrium Dynamics // Journal of Economic Issues, 43(2), 371-380. Laín-Entralgo, P. (1982). El Diagnóstico Médico: Historia y Teoría. Barcelona: Salvat. Leeson, P. (2019). Logic is a harsh mistress: Welfare economics for economists // Journal of Institutional Economics (forthcoming). Levitsky, S. and Way, L. A. (Eds.) (2010). Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press. Liebowitz, S. J. and Margolis, S. E. (Eds.) (2014). Path Dependence and Lock-In. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Magnusson, L. and Ottosson, J. (Eds.) (2009). The Evolution of Path Dependence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (Eds.) (2010). Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press. Marcus, G. (2008). Kluge: The haphazard evolution of the human mind. Boston: Mariner Books. Mauskapf, M. and Zajac, E. (2013). The Emergence and Persistence of Institutional Dissonance at the New York Philharmonic, 1842-1928 // Academy of Management Proceedings, 2013(1), 12015. McHorney, C. A. (2000). Concepts and Measurement of Health Status and Health-Related Quality of Life. In: Albrecht, G. L., Fitzpatrick, R., Scrimshaw, S. C. (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Social Studies in Health and Medicine. London: SAGE Publications, 339-358. Mehlum, H., Moene, K. and Torvik, R. (2006). Institutions and the resource curse // The Economic Journal, 116(508), 1-20. Menaldo, V. (2016). The Institutions Curse: Natural Resources, Politics, and Development. New York: Cambridge University Press. Merton, R. (1957). Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press. Mezzich, J.E. et al. (2016). Person-Centered Integrative Diagnosis and Its Context / Mezzich, J. E., Salloum, I. M., Cloninger, C. R. and Botbol, M. In: Mezzich, J. E., Botbol, M., Christodoulou, G. N., Cloninger, C. R. and Salloum, I. M. (Eds.). Person Centered Psychiatry. Cham: Springer, 139-156. Naville, E. (1871). The Problem of Evil: Seven Lectures. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark. Nelson, R. R. (2017). Thinking About Technology Policy: «Market Failures» versus «Innovation systems». Working Paper IIPP WP 2017-02. London: Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose. Nutzinger, H. G. (1982). The Economics of Property Rights – A New Paradigm in Social Science? In: Stegmuller, W., Balzer, W., Spohn, W. (Eds.). Philosophy and Economics: Proceedings, Munich, July 1981. Berlin: Springer, 169-190. O’Malley, M. A. (2009). Making Knowledge in Synthetic Biology: Design Meets Kludge // Biological Theory, 4(4), 378-389. Olson, M. (1982). The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation and Social Rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press. Ostrom, E. (1992). Crafting institutions for self-governing irrigation systems. California: Institute for Contemporary Studies. Pappas, T. S. (2019). Populism and Liberal Democracy: A Comparative and Theoretical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Petit, N. (2016). Technology Giants, the Moligopoly Hypothezis and Holistic Competition: A Primer. (October 20, 2016). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2856502. Pike, A. et al. (2015). Local institutions and local economic development: the Local Enterprise Partnerships in England, 2010 – / Pike, A., Marlow, D., McCarthy, A., O’Brien, P. and Tomaney, J. // Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(2), 185-204. Polishchuk, L. (2012). Misuse of Institutions: Lessons from Transition. In: Roland, G. (Ed.). Economies in Transition. Studies in Development Economics and Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 172-193. Polterovich, V. (2018). Institutional Trap. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics: Living Edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan. URL: https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1057%2F978-1-349-95121-5_2717-1. Rahman, H. M. T. et al. (2017). A framework for analyzing institutional gaps in natural resource governance / Rahman, H. M. T., Saint Ville, A. S., Song, A. M., Po, J. Y. T., Berthet, E., Brammer, J. R., Brunet, N. D., Jayaprakash, L.G., Lowitt, K. N., Rastogi, A., Reed, G. and Hickey, G. M. // International Journal of the Commons, 11(2), 823-853. Reid, A. (2019). Copyright Policy as Catalyst and Barrier to Innovation and Free Expression // Catholic University Law Review, 68(1), 33-86. Richards, D., Smith, M. and Hay, C. (2014). Conclusion: Apres le Deluge? Crisis, Continuity and Change in UK Institutions. In: Richards, D., Smith, M. and Hay, C. (Eds.). Institutional Crisis in 21st Century Britain. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 256-272. Rodrik, D. (2018). Is Populism Necessarily Bad Economics? // AEA Papers and Proceedings, 108, 196-199. Ross, M. L. (2015). What Have We Learned about the Resource Curse? // Annual Review of Political Science, 18(1), 239-259. Santagata, W. (1995). Institutional Anomalies in the Contemporary Art Market // Journal of Cultural Economics, 19(2), 187-197. Sassen, S. (2006). Territory, authority, rights: from medieval to global assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Schmidt, P. (2018). Market failure vs. system failure as a rationale for economic policy? A critique from an evolutionary perspective // Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28(4), 785-803. Schreyögg, G. and Sydow, J. (Eds.) (2010). The Hidden Dynamics of Path Dependence: Institutions and Organizations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Senftleben, M. (2011). Overprotection and Protection Overlaps in Intellectual Property Law – the Need for Horizontal Fair Use Defences. In: Kur, A. and Mizaras, V. (Eds.). The Structure of Intellectual Property Law: Can One Size Fit All? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 136-181. Serres, M. (1994). Atlas. Paris: Julliard. Serres, M. (1995). Genesis. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Shapiro, C. (2018). Antitrust in a time of populism // International Journal of Industrial Organization, 61(C), 714-748. Sholl, J. (2016). Contextualizing Medical Norms: Georges Canguilhem’s Surnaturalism. In: Giroux, E. (Ed.). Naturalism in the Philosophy of Health. History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences. Cham: Springer, 81-100. Smyth, L. (2016). The Disorganized Family: Institutions, Practices and Normativity // British Journal of Sociology, 67(4), 678-696. Sokol, D. D. and Comerford, R. (2016). Antitrust and Regulating Big Data // George Mason Law Review, 23(5), 1129-1161. Spicer, A. (2010). Extitutions: The other side of institutions // Ephemera, 10(1), 25-39. Spooner, J. (2019). Bankruptcy: The Case for Relief in an Economy of Debt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Stucke, M. E. (2013). Is competition always good? // Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 1(1), 162-197. Takechi, K. (2012). Negative Effect of Intellectual Property Protection: The Unusual Suspects? RIETI Discussion Paper 112-E-057. Tokyo: RIETI. Tirado, F. J. and Domenech, M. (1998). Sobre extituciones: reflexiones críticas para la psicología social de las instituciones // Revista Universidad de Guadalajara, 11, 43-51. Tirado, F. J. and Domenech, M. (2001). Extituciones: el poder y sus anatomias // Política y Sociedad, 36, 191-204. Tirado, F. J. and Mora, M. (2004). Cyborgs y extituciones: nuevas formas para lo social. Guadalajara: Universidad de Guadalajara. Tirado, F. and Maureira, M. (2016). De Objetos y Extituciones: nuevos operadores de lo social // Oxímora: revista internacional de ética y política, 8, 112-130. Townsend, D. M. and Hart, T. A. (2008). Perceived Institutional Ambiguity and the Choice of Organizational Form in Social Entrepreneurial Ventures // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 685-700. Tullock, G., Seldon, A. and Brady, G. (2002). Government Failure: A Primer in Public Choice. Washington: Cato Institute. Vadera, A. K., Pratt, M. G. and Mishra, P. (2013). Constructive Deviance in Organizations: Integrating and Moving Forward // Journal of Management, 39(5), 1221-1276. Vries, P. (2013). Does wealth entirely depend on inclusive institutions and pluralist politics? A review of Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson, Why nations fail // Ensayos de Economía, 23(43), 181-202. Widmer, E. D. (2016). Family configurations. A Structural Approach to Family Diversity. London: Routledge. Winiecki, J. (2016). Shortcut or Piecemeal: Economic Development Strategies and Structural Change. Budapest; New York: Central European University Press. World Development Report 2017: Governance and the Law (2017). Washington: The World Bank. Wyler, D. and Haklay, M. (2018). Integrating citizen science into university. In: Hecker, S., Haklay, M., Bowser, A., Makuch, Z., Vogel, J. and Bonn, A. (Eds.). Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. London: UCL Press, 168-182. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/95960 |