Stukach, Victor and Saparova, Gulnar and Sultanova, GuZel and Saginova, Sania (2018): Инфраструктура сельского хозяйства Казахстана: динамика аграрного производства, взаимодействие производственной и социальной сферы. Published in: Экономика региона , Vol. 2(15), No. 2 (15) (June 2019): pp. 561-575.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_96291.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
The article deals with the problem of infrastructure development of agriculture as a condition for the interaction of industrial and social spheres, sustainable positive dynamics of agricultural production, development of rural areas of Kazakhstan. The main tendencies of development of agro-industrial complex in the Republic of Kazakhstan on the temporary stages based on statistical data are presented. The study showed that the level of endowments as an important parameter of social capital formation in the social and industrial infrastructure of agriculture in Kazakhstan remains extremely unstable. This circumstance can form a tendency to decline and degradation of Kazakh villages. This, in turn, will have a negative impact on production volumes. The endowment, in this case, will form an unstable dynamics in the production of agricultural raw materials. Thus, the formation and development of agro-industrial infrastructure is considered as a necessary condition for effective interaction of subjects of primary and secondary production, contributing to the development of common prerequisites for the growth and development of agricultural products. The results of the study can be used by the state to invest in social, transport and industrial development of the village to ensure food security. Agricultural development of rural areas of Kazakhstan on the basis of infrastructure improvement will increase the welfare of rural workers, solve the problem of quality food for the population of the country, as well as take an active part in solving the global problem of eradicating hunger on the planet.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Инфраструктура сельского хозяйства Казахстана: динамика аграрного производства, взаимодействие производственной и социальной сферы |
English Title: | Infrastructure of agriculture of Kazakhstan: dynamics of agricultural production, interaction of industrial and social spheres. |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | agricultural products, food security, agriculture, production infrastructure, agricultural production, social infrastructure, rural population, investments, endowments |
Subjects: | M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q13 - Agricultural Markets and Marketing ; Cooperatives ; Agribusiness Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation |
Item ID: | 96291 |
Depositing User: | Виктор Федорович Стукач |
Date Deposited: | 01 Oct 2019 21:00 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 21:00 |
References: | 1. Strokov S. N. (2014). Mekhanizmy Obespecheniia Vnutrennei Prodovol’’stvennoi Bezopasnosti Kanady. [Mechanisms for ensuring domestic food security in Canada?] Nikonovskiye chteniya. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie izmereniia, prognozirovaniia i upravleniia prodovol’stvennoi bezopasnost’iu Rossii [Readings from Nikonov. Theoretical and methodological dimensions, forecasting and management of the food security of Russia], 19, 331–332. (In Russ.) 2. Sazonov S. P. (2011). K voprosu o gosudarstvenno-chastnom partnerstve [On Public-Private Partnership], Izvestia VSTU, 14, 19–21. (In Russ.) 3. Altukhov A. (2015). Territorial’’no-otraslevoe razdelenie truda v agropromyshlennom proizvodstve rossii — kak osnovnoi faktor ego razvitiia [Territorial and sectoral division of labour in agro-industrial production], Nikonovskiye chteniya. Agrarnaia politika sovremennoi Rossii: nauchno-metodicheskie aspekty i strategiia realizatsii [Readings from Nikonov. Agrarian Policy of Modern Russia: scientific and methodological aspects and development strategy], 7, pp. 9–20. (In Russ.) 4. Anfinogentova A. (2014). Mezhotraslevoi podkhod k obosnovaniiu natsional’noi programmy prodovol’stvennoi bezopasnosti [Cross-sectoral approach to the rationale for the national food security program]. The Economist, 8, 40–47. (In Russ.) 5. Senchagov V. K. (2005). Ekonomicheskaia bezopasnost’ Rossii [Economic Security of Russia], General Course: Textbook. 2nd Ed. Moscow, 896. (In Russ.) 6. Dronov R.R. (2001). Podkhody k obespecheniiu ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti [Approaches to Ensure Economic Security], The Economist, 2, 42–45. (In Russ.) 7. Moldashev A. B., Nikitina G. A. (2017). Napravleniia optimizatsii vzaimodeistviia kazakhstana so stranami eaes v oblasti agropromyshlennoi politiki [Directions of optimization of interaction of Kazakhstan with the EAEC countries in the field of agri-industrial policy], Problemy agrorynka [Problems of the agromarket], 1, 7–14. (In Russ.) 8. Avdugaliyev R. A. (2008). Ways to improve social infrastructure in rural areas, Collective food security of the CIS countries: problems and solutions, conference proceedings. Almaty: Research Institute of Agriculture Economics and Rural Development, JSC KazAgroInnovation, 481. 9. Ulied A., Biosca O., Rodrigo R. (2010) Urban and Rural Narratives and Spatial Development Trends in Europe: The State of the Question. Barcelona: Mcrit SL, 102. 10. Bino O. (2013) The Green Economy and Sustainable Development: An Uneasy Balance? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31, 1042. doi: 10.1068/c1310j. 11. Izotov A. S. (1997). Sotsial’naia infrastruktura kak instrument povysheniia effektivnosti predpriiatiia [Social infrastructure as a tool to improve productivity of enterprises]. Cand. Sci. thesis. Saint Petersburg, 203. (In Russ.) 12. Ovchintseva L. A., Merzlov F. V., Popova O. A. (2012). Regional’nyi opyt razrabotki programm ustoichivogo razvitiia sel’skikh territorii [Regional experience in developing programs for sustainable development of rural areas]. Мoscow, FSBSI Rosinformagrotech Publ., 112. (In Russ.) 13. Klimushkina Y. S. (2006). Razvitie sotsial’no-proizvodstvennoi infrastruktury sela: na primere Ul’ianovskoi oblasti [Development of the social and industrial infrastructure of the village (on the example of the Ulyanovsk Region)]. Cand. Sci. thesis, Orenburg, 256. (In Russ.) 14. Zhuravel N. M. (1990). Statisticheskoe modelirovanie i prognozirovanie [Statistical modelling and forecasting]. Ed., Granberg A. G., Мoscow: Finance and Statistics, 383. (In Russ.) 15. Zekin V. N., Svetlakov A.G. (2014). Prognoznyj scenarij razvitija infrastruktury sel’skih territorij [Forecast scenario of rural infrastructure development (on the example of the Privolzhsky Federal District)]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of the region], 2, 230–238. (In Russ.) 16. Omarkhanova Zh., Kuznetsova A. R., Salzhanova Z. A., Gimranova G. I., Nakipova G. E. (2015). Ekonomicheskii Mekhanizm Razvitiia APK v Kazakhstane [The economic mechanism of agribusiness development in Kazakhstan], Kazakhstan: Karaganda Economic University Kazpotrebsoyuz, 312. (In Russ.) 17. Saparova G. K. (2002). Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie problemy razvitiia potrebitel’skoi kooperatsii Kazakhstana [Socioeconomic problems of consumer cooperation development in modern conditions], Almaty: Gylym, 204. (In Russ.) 18. Serova E. V. (1999). Agrarnaia ekonomika [Agrarian economy], Moscow: State University Higher School of Economics, 479. (In Russ.) 19. Stukach V. F. (2012). Regional’naia Infrastruktura APK [Regional infrastructure of the agribusiness]. Moscow: KolosS, 220 (In Russ.) 20. Nordhaus V., Samuelson L. (1999). Economics. Мoscow: Ed. Binom Knorus, 800. 21. Molchanova N. P., Chernysh E. A. (1999). Prognozirovanie i planirovanie v usloviyakh rynka [Forecasting and planning in market conditions]. М.: PRIOR Publ., 176. (In Russ.) 22. Tretyachenko T. V. (2007). Sotsial’naya infrastruktura munitsipal’nogo obrazovaniya v regional’nom kontekste: sostoyanie, faktory i mekhanizmy rynochnoy transformatsii [Social infrastructure of the municipal formation in the regional context: state, factors and mechanisms of market transformation]. Cand. Sci. thesis, 214. (In Russ.) 23. Ansoff I. (1999). New corporate strategy. Trans. from English. by Ed. Yu.N. Kapturevsky . St. Petersburg: PITER, 401. (In Russ.) 24. Ansoff I., Avner J., Brandenburg R., Portlier F., Radosevich R. (1970). Does Planning Pay? The Effect of Planing on Success of Acquisitions in American Firms. Long-range Planning Journal, 3(2), 2–7. 25. Bagiev G. L., Moiseyeva N. K., Cherenkov V. I. (2008). Mezhdunarodnyy marketing [International Marketing], 2nd ed. St. Petersburg: Peter, 688. (In Russ.) 26. Shevchenko E. V. (2016). Forsayt: metodologiya, praktika issledovaniy [Foresight: methodology, research practice],/ Shevchenko E. V.,Stukach V.F., Tretyak V.P. Omsk: LITERA, 168. (In Russ.) 27. Moldashev A. B. (2008). O prodovol’stvennoy bezopasnosti v respublike Кazakhstan [About food security of the Republic of Kazakhstan], Problemy agrorynka [Problems of the agromarket], 4, 26. (In Russ.) 28. Stukach V. F. (2008). Institutsional’naya struktura regional’nogo agroprodovol’stvennogo rynka [Institutional structure of regional agro-food market], Omsk: Sfera, 224. (In Russ.) 29. Wallis J. (1986). Measuring the Transactional Sector in American Economy, 1870–1970, Long-term factors in American Economic Growth. Chicago, 33–45. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/96291 |