Jara-Bertin, Mauricio and López-Iturriaga, Félix J. (2008): Earnings Management and Contest to the Control: An Analysis of European Family Firms.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_9660.pdf Download (176kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper analyzes the influence of large shareholders on earnings management in family-owned firms using a sample of firms from 11 European countries. We consider how the contest to the control of the largest shareholder and the existence of a controlling coalition in family-owned firms affect earnings management in these firms. We find that increased contestability of the control of the largest shareholder reduces earnings management in family-owned firms. Our results also show that in firms in which the largest shareholder is a family, a second or third family shareholder increases discretionary accruals.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Earnings Management and Contest to the Control: An Analysis of European Family Firms |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | corporate control; discretionary accruals; earnings management; family firms |
Subjects: | M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M4 - Accounting and Auditing > M41 - Accounting G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G32 - Financing Policy ; Financial Risk and Risk Management ; Capital and Ownership Structure ; Value of Firms ; Goodwill |
Item ID: | 9660 |
Depositing User: | Félix López-Iturriaga |
Date Deposited: | 22 Jul 2008 09:08 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 08:14 |
References: | Ahmed, A.S., B.K. Billings, R.M. Morton, and M. Stanford-Harris. 2002. The role of accounting conservatism in mitigating bondholder-shareholder conflicts over dividend policy and in reducing debt costs. The Accounting Review 77 (4): 867–890. Ali, A., T. Y. Chen, and S. Radhakrishnan. 2007. Corporate disclosures by family firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 44: 238–286. Alonso-Borrego, C. and M. Arellano, M. 1999. Symmetrically normalized instrumental variable estimation using panel data, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 17: 36-49. Anderson, R., and D. M. Reeb. 2003. Founding family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance 58: 1301–1329. Arellano, M. 2003. Panel Data Econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ———, and S. Bond. 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equation. Review of Economic Studies 58: 277–297. Ball, R., S. P. Kothari, and A. Robin. 2000. The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 29: 1–52. ———, A. Robin, and J. S. Wu. 2003. Incentives versus standards: Properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries. Journal of Accounting and Economics 36: 235–270. Baltagi, B. H. 1996. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley. Barber, B., and J. Lyon. 1996. Detecting abnormal operating performance: The empirical power and specification of test statistics. Journal of Financial Economics 41: 359–399. Barontini, R., and L. Caprio. 2005. The effect of family control on firm value and performance. Evidence from Continental Europe. European Corporate Governance Institute working paper no. 088/2005. Bartov, E., F. Gul, and J. Tsui. 2000. Discretionary-accruals models and audit qualifications. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30 (3): 421–452. Beasley, M. S. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review 71 (4): 443–465. Beaver, W. H. 2002. Perspectives on recent capital market research. The Accounting Review 77 (2): 453–474. ———, and E. Engel. 1996. Discretionary behaviour with respect to allowances for loan losses and the behaviour of security prices. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22: 177–206. Becker, C., M. DeFond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. R. Subramanyam. 1998. The effects of audit quality on earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 15: 1–24. Bedard, J. C., and K. M. Johnstone. 2004. Earnings manipulation risk, corporate governance risk, and auditors' planning and pricing decisions. The Accounting Review 79 (2): 277–304. Belsley, D. A., E. Kuh, and E. Roy. 2004. Regression Diagnostics. Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York: Wiley. Bennedsen, M., and D. Wolfenzon. 2000. The balance of power in closely held corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 58: 113–139. Bloch, F., and U. Hege. 2001. Multiple shareholders and control contest. Groupement de Recherche en Economie Quantitative d'Aix-Marseille, Document de Travail n. 01A16. Blundell, R., and S. Bond. 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 87: 115–143. Bond, S. 2002. Dynamic panel data models: A guide to micro data methods and practice. Working paper, The Institute for Fiscal Studies. Burgstahler, D. C., L. Hail, and C. Leuz. 2006. The importance of reporting incentives: Earnings management in European private and public firms. The Accounting Review 81 (5): 983–1016. Cheng, Q., and T. D. Warfield. 2005. Equity incentives and earnings management. The Accounting Review 80 (2): 441–476. Claessens, S.; S. Djankov, J. P. H. Fan, and L. H. P. Lang. 2002: Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance 57 (6): 2741–2771. ———, S. Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 58: 81–112. Cronqvist, H., and M. Nilsson. 2003. Agency costs of controlling minority shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38 (4): 695–719. Dechow, P. M. 1994. Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance. The role of accounting accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 18 (1): 3–42. ———, and I. Dichev. 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77 (Supplement): 35–59. ———, and D. J. Skinner. 2000. Earnings management: Reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners, and regulators. Accounting Horizons 14 (2): 235–250. ———, R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70 (2): 193–225. DeFond, M., and J. Jiambalvo. 1991. Incidence and circumstances of accounting errors. The Accounting Review 66: 643–355. ———, and ———. 1994. Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17 (1–2): 145–176. ———, and K. R. Subramanyam. 1998. Auditor changes and discretionary accruals. Journal of Accounting an Economics 25: 35–68. Djankov, S., R. La Porta, F. López-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 2005. The law and economics of self-dealing. NBER working paper no. 11883. Edwards, J. and A. Weichenrieder. 2004. Ownership concentration and share valuation: evidence from Germany. German Economic Review 5: 143–171. Faccio, M., and L. H. P. Lang. 2002. The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 65: 365–395. Fan, J. P. H., and T. J. Wong. 2002. Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33: 401–425. Farber, D. B. 2005. Restoring after fraud: Does corporate governance matter? Accounting Review 80: 539–561. Francis J., K. Shipper, K., and L. Vicent. 2005. Earnings and dividends informativeness when cash flow rights are separated from voting rights. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39: 329–360. Gomes, A., and W. Novaes. 2001. Sharing of control as a corporate governance mechanism. Research paper no. 01-12, University of Pennsylvania Law School. Gómez Mejía, L.R., M. Núñez Nickel, and I. Gutiérrez, I. 2001. The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal 44(1): 81–95. Haw, I., B. Hu, L. Hwang, and W. Wu. 2004. Ultimate ownership, income management, and legal and extra-legal institutions. Journal of Accounting Research 42: 423–462. Ikenberry, D., J. Lakonishok, and T. Vermaelen, T. 1995. Market underreaction to open market share repurchases. Journal of Financial Economics 39: 181–208. Jiambalvo, J.; S. Rajgopal, and M. Venkatachalam. 2002. Institutional ownership and the extent to which stock prices reflect future earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research 19 (1): 117–145. Jones, J. J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (2): 193–228. Klein, A. 2002. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33: 375–400. Kothari, S. P., A. Leone, and C. E. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39: 163–197. Kutner, M. H., J. Neter, C. J. Nachtsheim, and W. Li. 2005. Applied Linear Statistical Models. New York: Mc Graw Hill. La Porta, R., F. López-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance 54 (2): 471–517. ———, F. López-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1997. Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance 52 (3): 1131–150. ———, F. López-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer and R. Vishny. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy 106: 1113–1155. ———, F. López-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer and R. Vishny. 2000. Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics 58 (1–2): 3–27. Larcker, D. F., S. A. Richardson, and I. Tuna. 2007. Corporate governance, accounting outcomes and organizational performance. The Accounting Review 82 (4): 963–1008. Lehmann, E., and J. Weigand. 2000. Does the governed corporation perform better? Governance structures and corporate performance in Germany. European Finance Review 4: 157–195. Leuz, C., D. Nanda, and P. Wysocki. 2003. Earnings management and investor protection: an international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics 69: 505–527. Louis, H., and D. Robinson. 2005. Do managers credibly use accruals to signal private information? Evidence from the pricing of discretionary accruals around stock splits. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39: 361–380. Lyon, J., B. Barber, and C. Tsui. 1999. Improved methods for tests of long-run abnormal stock returns. Journal of Finance 54: 165–201. Maury, B. 2006. Family ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from western European corporations. Journal of Corporate Finance 12: 321–344. ———,, and A. Pajuste, A. 2005. Multiple large shareholders and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance 29: 1813–1834. Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H., and Cannella, A. A. 2007. Are family firms really superior performers? Journal of Corporate Finance 13: 829–858. Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation. An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 293–315. Peasnell, K. V., P. F. Pope, and S. Young. 2005. Board monitoring and earnings management: Do outside directors influence abnormal accruals? Journal of Business Finance Accounting 32 (7–8): 1311–1346. Phillips, J., M. Pincus, and S. O. Rego. 2003. Earnings management: New evidence based on deferred tax expense. The Accounting Review 78 (2): 491–521. Sánchez Ballesta, J. P., and E. García Meca. 2007. Ownership structure, discretionary accruals and the informativeness of earnings. Corporate Governance: An International Review 15 (4): 677–691. Sweeney, A.P. 1994. Debt-covenant violations and managers' accounting responses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17, 281-308. Villalonga, B., and R. Amit. 2006. How do family ownership, control, and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics 80 (2): 385–417. Volpin, P. 2002. Governance with poor investor protection: Evidence from top executive turnover. Journal of Financial Economics 64: 61–90. Wang, D. 2006. Founding family ownership and earnings quality. Journal of Accounting and Research 44: 619–655. Xie, B., W. N. Davidson, III, and P. J. DaDalt. 2003. Earnings management and corporate governance: The roles of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance 9 (3): 295–316. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/9660 |