Ulubasoglu, Mehmet Ali and Yaraşır-Tülümce, Sevinç (2019): Pork and Turkey: Distributive Politics in the Allocation of Public Investments into Turkish Electoral Districts 1987–2004.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_96842.pdf Download (529kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We investigate the political factors involved in the allocation of public investments into Turkish electoral districts. In contrast to the general presumption in the literature, we argue that the Closed-List Proportional Representation electoral rule is associated with pork barrel politics, given the strong reelection motives of the legislators. Using a unique data set from Turkey covering detailed individual characteristics of approximately 2,000 MPs over five legislative periods during 1987–2004, we test this argument and demonstrate that the composition of legislator characteristics in a district proxying pork barrel engagement such as seniority, education, and former profession, matters significantly for attracting investments into specific geographic constituencies. The findings also indicate the strong presence of partisan motivations and targeted support for core and smaller opposition groups in public investment allocations. We also document that a stronger right-wing tendency in the cabinet, a single-party government, and fractionalized voter preferences and higher voter turnout in the electorate are all associated with increased public investments.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Pork and Turkey: Distributive Politics in the Allocation of Public Investments into Turkish Electoral Districts 1987–2004 |
English Title: | Pork and Turkey: Distributive Politics in the Allocation of Public Investments into Turkish Electoral Districts 1987–2004 |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Pork Barrel; Turkey; Individual Legislator Characteristics |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods |
Item ID: | 96842 |
Depositing User: | Professor Mehmet Ulubasoglu |
Date Deposited: | 14 Nov 2019 17:09 |
Last Modified: | 14 Nov 2019 17:09 |
References: | ALVAREZ, R. Michael, and Jason L. Saving (1997), “Deficits, Democrats, and Distributive Benefits: Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel in the 1980s”, Political Research Quarterly, Vol: 50, No: 4, pp. 809-833. ANSOLABEHERE, S., A. Gerber, and J. Snyder (2002), “Equal votes, equal money: court ordered redistricting and public expenditures in the American states.” American Political Science Review 96: 767-777. ARIN, K. Peren and Mehmet Ulubaşoğlu (2009), "Leviathan Resists: The Endogenous Relationship Between Privatization and Firm Performance," Public Choice, Springer, Vol. 140(1),July, pp. 185-204. BARRY, B. (1965), Political Argument, New York, Humanities Press, Brussels Correspondent. BESLEY, Timothy (2006). Principled Agents? The Political Economy of Good Governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford. BORDIGNON, M., P. Manasse and G. Tabellini (2001), “Optimal Regional Redistribution Under Asymmetric Information”, American Economic Review, 91, pp. 709–723. CADOT, Olivier, Lars Hendrik Röller, and Andreas Stephan (2006), “Contribution to Productivity or Pork Barrel? The Two Faces of Infrastructure Investment”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol: 90, pp.1133–1153. CALVO, Ernesto, and Maria Victoria Murillo (2004), “Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol: 48, No: 4, October, pp. 742–757. CASE, Anne (2001), “Election Goals and Income Redistribution: Recent Evidence from Albania”, European Economic Review, Vol: 45, pp. 405-423. CASTELLS, Antoni and Albert Sole-Olle (2005), “The Regional Allocation of Infrastructure Investment: The Role of Equity, Efficiency and Political Factors”, European Economic Review, 49,5, pp. 1165-1205. CHANG, Eric C (2005), “Electoral Incentives for Political Corruption under Open-List Proportional Representation”, Journal of Politics, Vol. 67, No. 3, August, pp. 716-730 COX, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins (1986), “Electoral Politics As A Redistributive Game”, Journal of Politics, Vol: 48, No: 2, May, pp. 370-389. DAHLBERG, Matz, and Eva Johansson (2002), “On the Vote-Purchasing Behavior of Incumbent Governments”, American Political Science Review, Vol: 96, No: 1, March, pp. 27-40. DENEMARK, David (2000), “Partisan Pork Barrel in Parliamentary Systems: Australian Pork Barrel Constituency Level Grants”, Journal of Politics, Vol: 62, No: 3, August, pp. 896-915 DIXIT, A., and J. Londregan (1996), “The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics”, Journal of Politics, Vol: 58, No: 4, pp. 1132-1155. DRISCOLL, J. C. and A. C. Kraay (1998), “Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, pp. 549–560. FELDMAN, Paul, and J. Jondrow (1984), “Congressional Elections and Local Federal”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol: 28, No: 1, February, pp. 147-164. FEREJOHN, John (1974), Pork Barrel Politics: Rivers and Harbors Legislation 1947-1968, Stanford University Press. FOWLER, James H., Laura A. Baker and Christopher T. Dawes (2008), “Genetic Variation in Political Participation’’, American Political Science Review, 102 (2), pp. 233–48. GAMM, Gerald and John Huber (2002), “Legislatures as Political Institutions: Beyond the Contemporary Congress” In Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner, eds., Political Science: State of the Discipline III. New York: American Political Science Association/W.W. Norton. GOLDEN, Miriam A., and Lucio Picci (2008), “Pork Barrel Politics in Postwar Italy 1953-1994”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol: 52, No: 2, pp.268-289. HAHN, Jinyong, Jerry Hausman and Kuersteiner Guido (2007), “Long Difference Instrumental Variables Estimation for Dynamic Panel Models with Fixed Effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pp. 574-617. HASPEL, Moshe, Thomas F. Remington and Steven S. Smith (1998), “Electoral Institutions and Party Cohesion in the Russian Duma” Journal of Politics, 60 (2), pp. 417–39. HERRON, Eric S. (2002) , “Electoral Influences on Legislative Behavior in Mixed-Member Systems: Evidence from Ukraine's Verkhovna Rada”, Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3, August, pp. 361-382. HESSAMI, Zohal (2018), “Accountability and Incentives of Appointed and Elected Public Officials”, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 100(1): 51-64. HILLMAN, Arye, L. (2009), “Public Finance and Public Policy Responsibilities and Limitations of Government” Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 2009. HORIUCHI, Yusaku, and Jun Saito (2003), “Reapportionment and Redistribution: Consequences of Electoral Reform in Japan”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol: 47, No: 4, October, pp. 669-682. JAROCIŃSKA, Elena (2008), “Testing Models of Distributive Politics in Multiparty Systems: The Case of Spain”, Center for Social and Economic Research, Sienkiewicza 12, 00-010 Warsaw, Poland. JOHNSTON, R.J. (1979), “Congressional Committees and Department Spending: The Political Influence on the Geography of Federal Expenditure in the United States”, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, Vol: 4, No: 3, pp. 373-384. KEREVEL, Yann (2010), “The Legislative Consequences of Mexico’s Mixed-Member Electoral System, 2000-2009”, Electoral Studies, Vol: 29, pp. 691-703. KNEEBONE, Ronald D., and Kenneth J. McKenzie (2001), “Electoral and Partisan Cycles in Fiscal Policy: An Examination of Canadian Provinces”, International Tax and Public Finance, Vol: 8, pp. 753-774. KWON, Hyeok Yong (2005), “Targeting Public Spending in a New Democracy: Evidence from South Korea”, British Journal of Political Science, Vol: 35, pp. 321–341. KUNICOVA, Jana and Susan Rose Ackerman (2001), “Electoral Rules As Constraints on Corruption The Risks of Closed-List Proportional Representation”, Leitner Working Papers. LANCASTER, T. D. (1986), “Electoral Structures and Pork Barrel Politics”, International Political Science Review, Vol: 7, No: 1, January, pp. 67-81. LANCASTER, Thomas and W. David Patterson (1990), “Comparative Pork Barrel Politics: Perceptions from the West German Bundestag.” Comparative Political Studies 22, No: 4, pp. 458–77. LEIGH, Andrew (2008), “Bringing home the Bacon: An Empirical Analysis of the Extent and Effects of Pork Barreling in Australian Politics”, Public Choice, Vol. 137, pp. 279-299. LEVITT, Steven D., and James M. Snyder (1997), “The Impact of Federal Spending on House Election Outcomes”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol: 105, No: 1, February, pp. 30-53. LIZZERI, Alessandro and Nicola Persico (2001), “The Provision of Public Goods under Alternative Electoral Incentives”, American Economic Review, Vol. 91, No. 1, March, pp. 225-239. LUCA, David and Andres Rodriguez-Pose (2015), “Distributive Politics and Regional Investment: Assessing the Territorial Distribution of Turkey’s Public Investment”, Journal of Development Studies, vol. 51, Issue 11. pp. 1518-1540. MAYHEW, David (1974), Congress: The Electoral Connection, New Haven Yale University. MILESI-FERRETTI,G. M., Roberto Perotti and Massimo Rostagno (2002) “Electoral Systems and Public Spending”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 117, No. 2, May, pp. 609-657 MILLIGAN, Kevin and M. Smart (2005), “Regional Grants As Pork Barrel Politics”, Cesifo Working Paper No: 1453, Category 1, Public Finance, April, pp. 1-25. OATES, Wallece E. (1972), Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. PEKKANEN, Robert, Benjamin Nyblade and Ellis S. Krauss (2006), “Electoral Incentives in Mixed-Member Systems: Party, Posts, and Zombie Politicians in Japan”, American Political Science Review, Vol. 100, No. 2, May, pp. 183-193. PEREIRA, Carlos, and Lucia Renno (2003), “Successful Re-election Strategies in Brazil: The Electoral Impact of Distinct Institutional Incentives”, Electoral Studies, Vol: 22, pp. 425-448. SAMUELS, David J. (2002), “Pork Barreling Is Not Credit Claiming or Advertising: Campaign Finance and the Sources of The Personal Vote in Brazil”, Journal of Politics, Vol: 64, No: 3, August, pp. 845-863. SCHADY, Norbert R. (2000), “The Political Economy of Expenditures by the Peruvian Social Fund (FONCODES), 1991-1995”, American Political Science Review, Vol: 94, No: 2, pp. 289-304. SHUGART, Matthew, Melody Ellis Valdini and Kati Suominen (2005), “Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote-Earning Attributes of Legislators Under Proportion Representation”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol: 49, No: 2, April, pp. 437-449. SIEBERER, Ulrich (2010), “Behavioral Consequences of Mixed Electoral Systems: Deviating Voting Behavior of District and List MPs in the German Bundestag”, Electoral Studies, Vol: 29, pp. 484-496. SMART, Michael and Milligan, Kevin (2005), “Regional Grants As Pork Barrel Politics”, Cesifo Working Paper No: 1453, pp. 1-25. STATE PLANNING ORGANIZATION. Investment Programs 2001, 2007, 2008, Ankara. STATE PLANNING ORGANIZATION. Public Investment Reports 1987-2001, Ankara. STEIN, Robert M and K. N. Bickers (1995), Perpetuating The Pork Barrel: Political Subsystems and American Democracy, Cambridge University Press. STEIN, Robert M. and K. N. Bickers (1994), “Congressional Elections and Pork Barrel”, Journal of Politics, Vol: 56, No: 2, May, pp. 377-399. STRATMANN, Thomas and Martin Baur (2002), “Plurality Rule, Proportional Representation, and the German Bundestag: How Incentives to Pork-Barrel Differ Across Electoral Systems”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 46, No. 3, July, pp.506-514 THOMPSON, Joel A (1986), “Bringing Home the Bacon: the Politics of Pork Barrel in the North Carolina Legislature”, Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 1., pp. 91-108. TUIK (2008), Milletvekili Genel Seçimleri (General Elections) 1923-2007, Ankara. WEINGAST, Barry, Kenneth A. Shepsle and Christopher Johnsen (1981), “The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol: 89, No: 4, August, pp. 642-664. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/96842 |