Climate Policies and the Tax-Interaction Effect, in Context

Macon, Luke and McLellan, Benjamin and Kanamura, Takashi (2019): Climate Policies and the Tax-Interaction Effect, in Context.

Abstract

The tax-interaction effect is, arguably, a lynchpin in the modern apparatus substantiating a trade-off between economic efficiency and environmental quality. In recent years, it has come into particular focus in discussions of climate policy, meriting mention inside and outside of academia. Given relatively simple scenarios, the tax-interaction effect demonstrates that resultant distortions in the labor market explode the cost of most conventional environmental policy tools. It is the aim of this discourse to introduce concepts that will add realistic complexity to scenarios exhibiting the tax-interaction effect, allowing it to be placed better into the context of a real-world economy. This is done by synthesizing conclusions across widely differing bodies of literature to suggest perspectives which bring forward related, important and untapped concepts. Four findings are presented. First, recent developments in understanding of work effort open the possibility for previously modeled labor distortions to divert from real behavior. Second, pre-existing labor supply market failures possibly distort work incentives in tandem with labor taxes. Third, perspectives and results from environmental willingness to pay literature and median voter theory dictate that carbon policy distorts the labor market differently in the presence of a voting system. Each finding is conducive to reconsideration of climate policy costs as well as the tax-interaction effect in a real setting. Sections are written for a broad audience in academia and policymaking alike.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: tax-interaction effect; climate policy; environmental policy; economic policy; behavioral biases; median voter theory; labor economics; labor distortions; willingness-to-pay; work incentives
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J20 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming

References

Akgunduz, Y. E., & Plantenga, J. (2015). Childcare Prices and Materal Employment: a Meta-Analysis. The Hague: CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.

Aldy, J. E., Kotchen, M. J., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2012). Willingness to pay and political support for a US national clean energy standard. Nature Climate Change, 596-599.

Bento, A. M., & Jacobsen, M. (2007). Ricardian rents, environmental policy and the ‘double-dividend’ hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 17-31.

Bettendorf, L., Jongen, E., & Muller, P. (2015). Childcare subsidies and labour supply - Evidence from a large Dutch reform. Labour Economics, 112-123.

Blankenship, B., & Urpelainen, J. (2017). How Do Sectoral Interests Shape Distributive Politics? Evidence from Gasoline and Diesel Subsidy Reforms. Review of Policy Research.

Bloom, N., Schankerman, M., & Van Reenen, J. (2013). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica, 1347-1393.

Blumpkin, T., Ruffle, B., & Ganun, Y. (2012). Are income and consumption taxes ever really equivalent? Evidence from a real-effort experiment with real goods. European Economic Review, 1200-1219.

Carnevale, A., & Rose, S. (2013). The Undereducated American. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.

Carnevale, A., Jayasundera, T., & Gulish, A. (2016). College Haves and Have-Nots. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.

Chetty, R. (2015). Behavioral Economics and Public Policy: A Pragmatic Perspective. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings (pp. 1-33). Ely Lecture.

Chetty, R., Looney, A., & Kroft, K. (2009). Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence. American Economic Review, 1145-1177.

Clark, A., Frijter, P., & Shields, M. (2008). Relative Income, Happiness, and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles. American Economic Review, 95-144.

Clark, A., Masclet, D., & Villeval, M.-C. (2010). Effort and Comparison Income. ILR Review, 407-426.

Crawford-Brown, D., Barker, T., Anger, A., & Dessens, O. (2012). Ozone and PM related health co-benefits of climate change policies in Mexico. Environmental Science & Policy, 33-40.

Cuevas, S., & Haines, A. (2016). Health benefits of a carbon tax. The Lancet, 7-9.

Daly, M., Wilson, D., & Johnson, N. (2013). Relative Status and Well-Being: Evidence from U.S. Suicide Deaths. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1480-1500.

de Bartolome, C. (1995). Which Tax Rate Do People Use: Average or Marginal? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 79-96.

Epley, N., Mak, D., & Idson, L. C. (2006). Bonus or Rebate? The Impact of Income Framing on Spending and Saving. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 212-227.

Evans-Lacko, S., & Knapp, M. (2016). Global patterns of workplace productivity for people with depression: absenteeism and presenteeism costs across eight diverse countries. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 1525-1537.

Farber, H. (2005). Is Tomorrow Another Day? The Labor Supply of New York City Cabdrivers. Journal of Political Economy, 46-82.

Fehr, E., & Gachter, S. (2000). Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments. The American Economic Review, 980-994.

Fullerton, D., & Metcalf, G. E. (1997). Environmental Taxes and the Double-Dividend Hypothesis: Did You Really Expect Something for Nothing? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Goldin, C., & Katz, L. (2008). The Race between Education and Technology. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.

Goulder, L. H. (2013). Climate change policy's interactions with the tax system. Energy Economics, S3-S11.

Goulder, L. H., & Williams III, R. C. (2003). The Substantial Bias from Ignoring General Equilibrium Effects in Estimating Excess Burden. Journal of Political Economy, 898-927.

Kahn, M. E., & Kotchen, M. J. (2011). Business cycle effects on concern about climate change: the chilling effect of recession. Climate Change Economics, 257-273.

Kim, S. E., & Urpelainen, J. (2017). The Polarization of American Environmental Policy: A Regression Discontinuity Analysis of Senate. Review of Policy Research, Vol. 34, Issue 4.

Kotchen, M. J., Boyle, K. J., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2013). Willingness-to-pay and policy-instrument choice for climate-change policy in the United States. Energy Policy, 617-625.

Ladin, K., Daniels, N., & Kawachi, I. (2009). Exploring the Relationship Between Absolute and Relative Polisition and Late-Life Depression: Evidence From 10 European Countries. The Gerontologist, 58-59.

Lefebvre, P., Merrigan, P., & Verstraete, M. (2009). Labour Economics. Dynamic labour supply effects of childcare subsidies: Evidence from a Canadian natural experiment on low-fee universal child care, 490-502.

Liu, A. (2013). Tax evasion and optimal environmental taxes. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 656-670.

Mankiw, N. (2013). Defending the One Percent. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21-34.

Manski, C. (2012). Identification of Preferences and Evaluation of Income Tax Policy. NBER Working Paper.

Martinez A., C., & Perticara, M. (2017). Childcare effects on maternal employment: Evidence from Chile. Journal of Development Economics, 127-137.

McClelland, R., & Mok, S. (2012). A review of recent research on labor supply elasticities. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.

Meghir, C., & Phillips, D. (2008). Labor Supply and Taxes. Bonn: The Institute for the Study of Labor.

Moretti, E., Steinwender, C., & Van Reenen, J. (2015). The Intellectual Spoils of War? Defense R&D, Productivity and International Technology Spillovers. Working Paper.

Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.

Neumark, D., & Postlewaite, A. (1995). Relative Income Concerns and the Rise in Married Women's Employment. NBER Working Paper.

OECD. (2017). Revenue Statistics 2017. OECD.

Parry, I., & Bento, A. (2000). Tax Deductions, Environmental Policy, and the "Double Dividend" Hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 67-96.

Parry, I., & Williams, R. C. (2010). What are the costs of meetin distributional objectives for climate policy? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Parry, I., Veung, C., & Heine, D. (2014). How Much Carbon Pricing is in Coutries' Own Interests? The Critical Role of Co-Benefits. IMF Working Paper.

Pigou, A. (1954). Some Aspects of the Welfare State. Diogenes, 1-11. Rosen, H. S., & Gayer, T. (2014). Public Finance. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.

Saez, E. (2010). Do Taxpayers Bunch at Kink Points? American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 190-212.

Saez, E., Slemrod, J., & Giertz, S. (2012). The Elasticity of Taxable Income with Respect to Marginal Tax Rates: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature, 3-50.

Shum, R. Y. (2012). Effects of economic recessioin and local weaather on climate change attitudes. Climate Policy, 38-49.

Skuras, D., & Tyllianakis, E. (2016). The income elasticity of Willingness-to-Pay (WTP) revisited: A meta-analysis of studies for restoring Good Ecological Status (GES) of water bodies under the Water Framework Directive (WFD). Journal of Environmental Management, 531-541.

Tozer, J. (2018). What the numbers say higher earning. Retrieved from 1843magazine.com: https://www.1843magazine.com/data-graphic/what-the-numbers-say/higher-earning

West, S., & Williams III, R. (2004). Empirical Estimates for Environmental Policy Making in a Second-Best Setting. NBER Working Paper Series.

Williams III, R. C. (2002). Environmental Tax Interactions when Pollution Affects Health or Productivity . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 261-270.