Experiments on Clientelism and Vote Buying

Gallego, Jorge and Wantchekon, Leonard (2012): Experiments on Clientelism and Vote Buying. Published in: Research in Experimental Economics , Vol. 15, (15 June 2012): pp. 177-212.

Abstract

In this paper, we present a critical survey of experiments on political clientelism and vote-buying. We claim that through randomization and control, field experiments represent an important tool for answering causal questions, whereas list experiments provide useful methods that improve the hard task of measuring clientelism. We show that existing experimental research gives answers to the questions of why clientelism is effective for getting votes and winning elections, who relies more on this strategy – incumbents or challengers – how much clientelism takes place, and who tend to be the favorite targets of clientelistic politicians. The relationship between clientelism and other illicit strategies for getting votes, such as electoral violence and fraud, has also been analyzed through experimental interventions. Experiments have also studied mechanisms and policies for overcoming clientelism. Finally, we show that external validity is a major source of concern that affects this burgeoning literature

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Clientelism; Vote Buying; Experiments
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development

References

Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. and Santos, R. (2010). The Monopoly of Violence: Evidence from Colombia. Working Paper, MIT.

Banerjee, A. and Duflo, E. (2009). The Experimental Approach to Development Economics, Annual Review of Economics 1: 151–178.

Banerjee, A., Pande, R., Kumar, S. and Su, F. (2011). Do Informed Voters Make Better Choices? Experimental Evidence from Urban India, Working Paper, Harvard University.

Blair, G. and Imai, K. (2012). Statistical Analysis of List Experiments, Political Analysis 20(1): 47–77.

Brusco, V., Nazareno, M. and Stokes, S. (2004). Vote-Buying in Argentina, Latin American Research Review 39(2): 66–88.

Calvo, E. and Murillo, M. (2004). Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market, American Journal of Political Science 48(4): 742–757.

Chandra, K. (2004). Why Ethnic Parties Succeed, Cambridge University Press.

Chattopadhyay, R. and Duflo, E. (2004). Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India, Econometrica 72(5): 1409–1443.

Collier, P. and Vicente, P. (2011). Votes and Violence: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Nigeria. Working Paper, Trinity College Dublin.

Corstange, D. (2009). Sensitive Questions, Truthful Answers? Modeling the List Experiment with LISTIT, Political Analysis 17(1): 45–63.

Corstange, D. (2010). Vote-Buying under Competition and Monopsony: Evidence from a List Experiment in Lebanon. Paper prepared for delivery at the 2010 Annual Conference of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.

Diaz-Cayeros, A., Esteves, F. and Magaloni, B. (2011). Strategies of Vote-Buying: Social Transfers, Democracy, and Poverty Reduction in Mexico, Book Manuscript, Stanford University.

Dixit, A. and Londregan, J. (1996). The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics, Journal of Politics 58: 1132–1155.

Duflo, E. (2005). Gender Equality in Development. Working Paper, MIT.

Duflo, E. (2006). Field Experiments in Development Economics, prepared for the World Congress of the Econometric Society.

Fearon, J. (1999). Why Ethnic Politics and “Pork” Tend to Go Together. Presented at an SSRC-MacArthur sponsored conference on “Ethnic Politics and Democratic Stability,” University of Chicago.

Finan, F. and Schechter, L. (forthcoming). Vote-Buying and Reciprocity, Econometrica.

Gallego, J. (2011). Civil Conflict and Voting Behavior: Evidence from Colombia. Working Paper, New York University.

Gallego, J. (forthcoming). Self-Enforcing Clientelism, Journal of Theoretical Politics.

Golden, M. and Picci, L. (2008). Pork-Barrel in Postwar Italy: 1953-1992, American Journal of Political Science 52(2): 268–289.

Gonzalez-Ocantos, E., Kiewiet, C., Melendez, C., Osorio, J. and Nickerson, D. (2012). Vote Buying and Social Desirability Bias: Experimental Evidence from Nicaragua, American Journal of Political Science 56(1): 202–217.

Greene, K. (2001). Against the Machine: Party Organization and Clientelist Politics in Mexico, Working Paper, University of Texas.

Heerwig, J. and McCabe, B. (2009). Education and Social Desirability Bias: The case of a Black Presidential Candidate, Social Science Quarterly 90(3): 674–686.

Kitschelt, H. and Wilkinson, S. (2007). Patron, Clients, and Policies, Cambridge University Press.

Kobayashi, M. (2006). Political Clientelism and Corruption: Neo-Structuralism and Republicanism, in Kawata, J. (ed), “Comparing Political Corruption and Clientelism”. Cambridge University Press.

Kuklinsky, J., Cobb, M. and Gilens, M. (1997). Racial Attitudes and the “New South”, Journal of Politics 59(2): 323–349.

Leal, F. and Davila, A. (1990). Clientelismo. El Sistema Politico y su Expresi ́on Regional, Tercer Mundo Editores.

Lemarchand, R. (1972). Political Clientelism and Ethnicity in Tropical Africa: Competing Solidarities in Nation Building, American Political Science Review 66(1).

Nichter, S. (2008). Vote Buying or Turnout Buying? Machine Politics and the Secret Ballot, American Political Science Review 102(1): 19–31.

Robinson, J. and Verdier, T. (2003). The Political Economy of Clientelism. Working Paper, Harvard University.

Rodrik, D. (2008). The New Development Economics: We Shall Experiment, But How Shall We Learn?, in J. Cohen and W. Easterly, eds., “What Works in Development? Thinking Big and Thinking Small, Brookings Institution Press.

Rothwell, P. (2005). External Validity of Randomized Controlled Trials: “To Whom Do the Results of this Trial Apply?”, The Lancet 365: 82–93.

Scott, J. (1972). Patron-Clients Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia, American Political Science Review 66(1).

Smith, A. and de Mesquita, B. B. (2011). Contingent Prize Allocation and Pivotal Patronage, British Journal of Political Science.

Stokes, S. (2005). Perverse Accountability: a Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina, American Political Science Review 99(3): 315–325.

Streb, M., Burrell, B., Frederick, B. and Genovese, M. (2008). Social Desirability Effects and Support for a Female American President, Public Opinion Quarterly 72(1).

Szwarcberg, M. (2011). Who Monitors? Clientelism and Democratic Representation in Argentine Municipalities, Working Paper, University of Chicago.

Vicente, P. (2010). Is Vote-Buying Effective? Evidence from a Field Experiment in West Africa. Working Paper, Department of Economics, Trinity College Dublin.

Vicente, P. and Wantchekon, L. (2009). Clientelism and Vote-Buying: Evidence from Field Experiments in African Elections, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 25(2).

Wantchekon, L. (2003). Clientelism and Voting Behavior: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Benin, World Politics 55(3): 399–422.

Wantchekon, L. (2011). Deliberative Electoral Strategies and Transition from Clientelism: Experimental Evidence from Benin, Working Paper, Princeton University.

Weitz-Shapiro, R. (2011). Choosing Clientelism: Poverty, Politics, and Social Policy in Argentina, Book Manuscript, Brown University.