Lin, Ping and Zhang, Tianle (2019): Product Liability, Multidimensional R&D and Innovation.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_97078.pdf Download (170kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We study the effect of product liability on the incentives of product and safety innovation. We first develop a monopoly model in which a firm chooses both product novelty and safety in an innovation stage followed by a production stage. A greater product liability directly increases the marginal benefit of producing a safer product and thus increases product safety. However, as product liability increases, product novelty may increase or decrease, depending on the relative strengths of demand-shifting and cross-R&D effects identified in the model. Consequently, a greater product liability may decrease consumer welfare and thus total welfare. We extend the results to an oligopoly model with differentiated products and study the effects of competition measured by the number of firms and the degree of product substitutability. We find that equilibrium product novelty and safety decrease with the number of firms but exhibit non-monotonic relationships with the degree of product substitutability.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Product Liability, Multidimensional R&D and Innovation |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Product Liability, Safety, Novelty, Innovation Incentive |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design K - Law and Economics > K1 - Basic Areas of Law > K13 - Tort Law and Product Liability ; Forensic Economics L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets |
Item ID: | 97078 |
Depositing User: | Tianle Zhang |
Date Deposited: | 27 Nov 2019 13:22 |
Last Modified: | 27 Nov 2019 13:22 |
References: | Baumann, F. and Heine, K. (2013) "Innovation, Tort law, and competition", Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 169 (4), 703-719 Chen, C. (2001), "Design for the Environment: A Quality-Based Model for Green Product Development", Management Science, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 250-263. Chen, Y. and Hua, X., (2012) "Ex ante Investment, Ex post Remedy, and Product Liability" International Economic Review, Vol. 53, 845-866 Chen, Y. and Hua, X., (2017), "Competition, Product Safety, and Product Liability", Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Vol. 33, 237-267. Cooper, R. and Ross, T., (1985), "Product Warranties and Double Moral Hazard", Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 103-113 Daughety, A. and Reinganum, J., (1995). "Product Safety: Liability, R&D and Signaling," American Economic Review 85(5), 1187-1206. Daughety, A. and Reinganum, J. (2006). "Market, Torts, and Social Inefficiency." 37 Rand Journal of Economics 300-323 Daughety, A. and Reinganum, J. (2013). "Economic Analysis of Products Liability: Theory", Chapter 3 in the Research Handbook on the Economics of Torts, edited by Jennifer Arlen, Edward Elgar Publishing Co., Cheltenham, U.K., pp. 69-96. Dixit, A., (1979) "A Model of Duopoly Suggesting a Theory of Entry Barriers", Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 10, No. 1. pp20-32 Hua, X. (2011). "Product Recall and Liability." The Journal of Law, Economics, and OrganizationVol. 27. Mcguire, E., (1988), "The Impact of Product Liability", The Conference Board Research Report, New York, NO. 908 6-20 Polinsky, A., and Shavell, S., (2010), "The Uneasy Case for Product Liability", Harvard Law Review, Vol. 123, No. 6. Porter, M., (1990) "The Competitive Advantage of Nations". New York: Free Press. Viscusi, W. and Moore, M., (1993) "Product Liability, Research and Development, and Innovation" Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 101, No. 1, pp. 161-184 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/97078 |