The evolution of the US urban structure from a long-run perspective (1900-2000)

González-Val, Rafael (2007): The evolution of the US urban structure from a long-run perspective (1900-2000).

Abstract

This paper analyses the evolution of the size distribution of cities in the United States throughout the 20th century. In particular, we are interested in testing the fulfilment of two empirical regularities studied in urban economics: Zipf’s law, which postulates that the product between rank and size of a population is constant, and Gibrat’s law or the law of parallel growth, according to which the growth rate of a variable is independent of its initial size. For this parametrical and non-parametrical methods have been used. These laws have already been studied for the American case with the most populous cities or with MSAs. The main contribution of this work is the use of a new database with information on all the cities, thus covering the entire distribution. The results show that although if the sample is considered as a whole the fulfilment of Zipf’s law is rejected, Gibrat’s law is accepted for all the period considered.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Zipf’s law, Gibrat’s law, city size distribution, urban growth
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C14 - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R0 - General > R00 - General

References

Beeson, P.E., D.N. DeJong and W. Troesken, (2001). Population Growth in US Counties, 1840-1990. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 31: 669-699.

Black, D. and V. Henderson, (2003). Urban evolution in the USA. Journal of Economic Geography 3, pp. 343-372.

Bogue, D. (1953). Population growth in Standard Metropolitan Areas: 1900-1950. Washington, DC: Housing and Home Finance Agency.

Córdoba, J. C. (2004). A generalized Gibrat’s law for cities. Processed, Rice University.

Dobkins L. and Y. M. Iaonnides, (2000). Dynamic evolution of the US city size distribution. In: Huriot, J. M. and J. F. Thisse (Eds.), The economics of cities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 217-260.

Dobkins L. and Y. M. Iaonnides, (2001). Spatial interactions among US cities: 1900-1990. Regional Science and Urban Economics 31, 701-731.

Duranton, G. (2006). Some Foundations for Zipf´s Law: Product Proliferation and Local Spillovers, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 36, pages 542-563.

Eeckhout, J. (2004). Gibrat's Law for (All) Cities, American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(5), pages 1429-1451.

Ehrlich, S. and J. Gyourko, (2000). Changes in the scale and size distribution of US metropolitan areas during the twentieth century. Urban Studies, Vol. 37, No 7, 1063-1077

Gabaix, X. (1999). Zipf’s law for cities: An explanation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3):739-767.

Gabaix, X. and Y. M. Iaonnides, (2004). The evolution of city size distributions. Handbook of urban and regional economics, Vol. 4, J. V. Henderson and J. F. Thisse, eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, North-Holland, 2341-2378.

Glaeser, E. L. and J. Shapiro (2001). Is there a new urbanism? The growth of US cities in the 1990s. Harvard Institute of Economic Research, Discussion Paper number 1925.

Gibrat, R. (1931). Les inégalités économiques, Paris: Librairie du Recueil Sirey.

Härdle, W. (1990). Applied nonparametric regression. Econometric Society Monographs. Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

Ioannides Y. M. and H. G. Overman (2001). Cross-sectional evolution of the US city size distribution. Journal of Urban Economics 49, 543-566.

Ioannides Y. M. and H. G. Overman (2003). Zipf’s law for cities: an empirical examination. Regional Science and Urban Economics 33, 127-137.

Kim, S. (2002). The Reconstruction of the American Urban Landscape in the Twentieth Century. NBER Working Papers 8857, National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w8857

Kim, S. (2007). Changes in the nature of urban spatial structure in the United States, 1890-2000. Journal of Regional Science, vol. 47, No. 2, pp.273-287.

Krugman, P. (1996). The Self-organizing economy. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1996.

Pareto, V. (1896). Cours d’Economie Politique. Geneva: Droz.

Quah, D. T. (1993). Galton's Fallacy and Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 95, No. 4, Endogenous Growth (Dec., 1993), pp. 427-443.

Rose, A. K. (2006). Cities and countries, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 38(8), 2225-2246.

Rosen, K. T. and M. Resnick (1980). The Size Distribution of Cities: An Examination of the Pareto Law and Primacy, Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 8, pages 165-186.

Rossi-Hansberg, E. and M. L. J. Wright (2007). Urban structure and growth. Review of Economic Studies 74, 597–624.

Soo, K. T. (2005). Zipf’s Law for cities: a cross-country investigation. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35: 239-263.

Zipf, G. (1949). Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort, Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.