Yan, Lei (2019): 公共物品非排他性、非竞争性逻辑起源与自发产权制度.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_97512.pdf Download (957kB) | Preview |
Abstract
New-classical paradigm public goods theory holds that the Non-excludability and Non-rivalry are the objective attributes of public goods. However, in reality, it is difficult to find a good which is strictly Non-excludability and Non-rivalry. Trading paradigm theory holds that the Non-excludability and Non-rivalry of public goods derive from its collective decision-making and public provision. However, the theory does not give the decisive factors of collective decision-making and public provision. Starting from analyzing the use of goods, this paper discussed the Non-excludability and Non-rivalry characteristics of the goods in four assumed occasions based on different using methods and directions among users. It holds that Non-excludability and Non-rivalry are neither the objective attribute of goods, nor the result of public decision-making and public supply, but come from a special use situation among users. On this basis, it analyzes the conditions of private voluntary provision and consumption when the goods are non-exclusive and non-competitive and it analyzes the influence of the property rights institutions on the private supply and consumption and the spontaneous mechanism of property rights institutions.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | 公共物品非排他性、非竞争性逻辑起源与自发产权制度 |
English Title: | The origins of the Non-excludability and Non-rivalry of public goods and the spontaneous Property Rights Institutions |
Language: | Chinese |
Keywords: | Non-excludability,Non-rivalry,private voluntary provision,property right institutions |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H41 - Public Goods P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P14 - Property Rights |
Item ID: | 97512 |
Depositing User: | Lei Yan |
Date Deposited: | 12 Dec 2019 20:34 |
Last Modified: | 17 Dec 2019 14:53 |
References: | [1]张琦.公共物品理论的分歧与融合[J].经济学动态,2015,(11):147-158. [2]布坎南.公共物品的需求与供给[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1968. [3]张晋武,齐守印.公共物品概念定义的缺陷及其重新建构[J].财政研究,2016,(8):2-12. [4]J.Margolis. A Comment on the Pure Theory of Public Expenditure[J].The Review of Economics and Statistics,1955,37(4):347-349. [5]Enke. More on the misuse of mathematics in economics:A rejoinder[J].Review of Economics and Statistics,1955,37:131-133. [6]乔•B.史蒂文斯.集体选择经济学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2003. [7]加雷斯•D•迈尔斯.公共经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001. [8]卢之超.马克思主义大辞典[M].北京:中国和平出版社,1993. [9]《现代管理词典》编委会.现代管理辞典(第2版)[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社,2009. [10]黄恒学.公共经济学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002. [11]Y•巴泽尔.产权经济分析[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1997. [12]张五常.经济解释[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001. [13]袁义才.公共产品的产权经济学分析[J].江汉论坛,2003,(6):25-28. [14]吴立武.公、私产品界定标准局限性分析[J].财经理论与实践,2006,(2):7-10. [15]刘佩弦,常冠吾.马克思主义与当代辞典[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1988. [16]张五常.交易费用的范式[J].社会科学战线,1999,(1). |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/97512 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
公共物品非排他性、非竞争性逻辑起源与自发产权制度. (deposited 29 Nov 2019 07:09)
- 公共物品非排他性、非竞争性逻辑起源与自发产权制度. (deposited 12 Dec 2019 20:34) [Currently Displayed]