Present and future of evolutionary economics: post-institutionalist’s opinion

Frolov, Daniil (2019): Present and future of evolutionary economics: post-institutionalist’s opinion. Forthcoming in:

Abstract

Modern evolutionary economics is in the ripening phase and at the same time demonstrates clear signs of an internal crisis. Having become one of the main pillars of economic heterodoxy, this scientific community still does not have a common methodological framework, an agreed research program and a system of normative settings. Indirectly responding to this crisis, a group of leading evolutionists led by Richard Nelson in the book «Modern Evolutionary Economics: An Overview» (2018) suggests moving from direct competition with the neoclassical mainstream to a compromise solution. The compromise is to complement neoclassicism with implicit evolutionary thinking, i.e. adoption of the thesis “history matters” as the basic premise of analysis, even when studying economic phenomena in statics. Similar crisis processes (and attempts at compromise solutions) are now observed in neoinstitutional theory - the mainstream of modern institutionalism - especially in the field of studying the evolution of institutions. The author, as a representative of post-institutionalism, argues that these crises are based on the exhaustion of the potential of the neo-Darwinist paradigm as a source of conceptual metaphors for studies of the economic and social evolution. Overcoming the paradigmal crisis requires going beyond the prevailing (and already dogmatized) metaphors. The necessary conditions have formed for this step: a paradigm shift is taking place in modern biological science - an extended evolutionary synthesis is taking the place of neo-Darwinism, the «core» of which is evolutionary developmental biology (Evo-Devo). In this regard, evolutionary economists have the opportunity to update the basic methodological «settings» by moving from neo-Darwinist metaphors to metaphors of the Evo-Devo. The article presents three complex priority tasks related to the implementation of the Evo-Devo paradigm. First, the rejection of any version of reductionism, in particular from mono-aspect, monocausal and dichotomous thinking. Secondly, the rejection of the optimization and dysfunctional approaches with the transition to bricolage thinking, based on a positive perception of the organic imperfection of economic institutions, mechanisms and systems. Thirdly, the addition of the traditional systemic approach to assemblage thinking with an emphasis on hybrid systems, the multiplicity of their logics and the inevitability of their conflicts. It is shown that the Evo-Devo paradigm allows a more adequate explanation of the evolution of the irreducible complexity of economic systems

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: Russian
• Keywords: economic evolution; institutions; complexity; evolutionary economics; institutional economics; methodology
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A14 - Sociology of Economics; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B52 - Institutional ; Evolutionary

References

Asma, S. T. (2019). The Emotional Mind: The Affective Roots of Culture and Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Barberousse, A.,‎ Morange, M. and Thomas, P. (eds.). (2009). Mapping the Future of Biology: Evolving Concepts and Theories. Cham: Springer. Cantner, U. and Pyka, A. (2016). Editorial: Foundations of economic change – behavior, interaction and aggregate outcomes // Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 26(4), 697-700. Denton, M. (2016). Evolution: Still a Theory in Crisis. Seattle: Discovery Institute Press. Dopfer, K. and Potts, J. (2008). The General Theory of Economic Evolution. London: Routledge. Dopfer, K. and Potts, J. (2010). Why evolutionary realism underpins evolutionary economic analysis and theory: A reply to Runde’s critique // Journal of Institutional Economics, 6(3), 401-413. Foster, J. (2011). Evolutionary macroeconomics: a research agenda // Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 21(1), 5-28. Frolov, D. P. (2019). Evo-Devo: paradigm challenge for institutional-evolutionary analysis // Economic Science of Modern Russia, 2, 35-52 (In Russian). Griffiths, P. E., and Stotz, K. (2018). Developmental Systems Theory as a Process Theory. In: D. J. Nicholson, J. Dupre (eds.). Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 225-245. Hagen, K., Engelhard, M. and Toepfer, G. (eds.). (2015). Ambivalences of Creating Life. Societal and Philosophical Dimensions of Synthetic Biology. Cham: Springer. Heams, T. et al. (2015). Handbook of Evolutionary Thinking in the Sciences / T. Heams, P. Huneman, G. Lecointre, M. Silberstein (eds.). N. Y.: Springer. Hodgson, G. M. and Knudsen, T. (2010). Darwin's Conjecture: The Search for General Principles of Social and Economic Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Jacob, F. (1977). Evolution and Tinkering // Science, 196(4295), 1161-1166. Kapeller, J., Schutz, B. and Steinerberger, S. (2013). The impossibility of rational consumer choice: A problem and its solution // Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 23(1), 39-60. Kawai, K., Lang, R. and Li, H. (2018). Political Kludges // American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 10(4), 131-158. Kojevnikov, A. (1999). Freedom, Collectivism, and Quasiparticles: Social Metaphors in Quantum Physics // Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 29(2), 295-331. Laland, K. N. et al. (2015). The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions / K. N. Laland, T. Uller, M. W. Feldman, K. Sterelny, G. B. Müller, A. Moczek, E. Jablonka, J. Odling-Smee // Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1813), 1-14. Lewens, T. (2019). The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: what is the debate about, and what might success for the extenders look like? // Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 127(4), 707-721. Liagouras, G. (2017). The challenge of Evo-Devo: Implications for evolutionary economists // Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 27(4), 795-823. Luksha, P. O. (2006). Niche construction: a review of the models of interaction between the firm and the environment // Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 3, 7-34 (In Russian). Luksha, P. O. (2008). Niche construction strategies in situations of technological dominance (Java and Sun Microsystems case). Moscow: Institute of Economics, RAS (In Russian). Martin, R. and Sunley, P. (2015). Towards a developmental turn in evolutionary economic geography? Regional Studies, 49(5), 712-732. Mayevsky, V. (1997). Introduction to evolutionary macroeconomics. Moscow: Japan Today (In Russian). Metcalfe, J. S. (2001). Consumption, preferences, and the evolutionary agenda // Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 11(1), 37-58. Muller, G. B. (2007). Evo–devo: extending the evolutionary synthesis // Nature Reviews Genetics, 8(12), 943-949. Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (2002). Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Moscow: Delo (In Russian). Nelson, R. R. et al. (2018). Modern Evolutionary Economics: An Overview / R. R. Nelson, G. Dosi, C. E. Helfat, A. Pyka, S. G. Winter, P. P. Saviotti, K. Lee, F. Malerba, K. Dopfer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N. and Feldman M. W. (2003). Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Schmidt, P. (2018). Market failure vs. system failure as a rationale for economic policy? A critique from an evolutionary perspective // Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28(4), 785-803. Tadajewski, M. (2019). Habit as a central concept in marketing. Marketing Theory, 19(4), 447-466. Teles, S. M. (2013). Kludgeocracy in America // National Affairs, 17, 97-114. Williamson, O. E. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead // Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595-613. Witt, U. and Chai, A. (eds.). (2019). Understanding Economic Change: Advances in Evolutionary Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.