Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers on Health and Nutrition

Bhagowalia, Priya (2020): Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers on Health and Nutrition.

Abstract

This study examines the impact of conditional cash transfers (CCTs) for on sex ratios, health and nutrition of children. The main hypothesis is that CCTs may alter the perceived economic value of girls relative to boys, leading to more favorable sex ratios and better nutrition. Several studies have tried to explain the puzzling persistence of malnutrition inspite of rapid increases in economic growth and the reasons range from decreases in physical activity (Deaton and Dreze 2009) to the “South Asian Enigma” (Ramalingaswami, et al, 1997). The “South Asian enigma” underscores gender disparities as the main reason for the poor nutritional status despite high growth (Smith et al, 2003). We use data from the National Family Health Surveys (NFHS 2005-06 and 2015-16) to explore if cash transfer schemes for education make a positive and significant difference to sex ratios, nutrition and health seeking behavior. Our results suggest that cash transfer schemes have a positive but moderate impact on nutrition among eligible and non-eligible households, a positive impact on health seeking behaviors and that there are regional variations related to the implementation of the scheme

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Conditional Cash transfer, health, nutrition
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I15 - Health and Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development

References

Basole, A., & Basu, D. (2015). “Fuelling Calorie Intake Decline: Household-Level Evidence from Rural India”, World Development, 68, 82-95.

Bassett, L (2008): “Can Conditional Cash Transfer Programmes Play a Greater Role in Reducing Child Undernutrition?”, World Bank Social Policy Discussion Paper 835.

Behrman, J. and Wolfe, B. (1984) More evidence on nutrition demand: income seems overrated and women's schooling underemphasized, Journal of Development Economics, 14, 105-28.

Davis, B., Gaarder, M., Handa, S., & Yablonski, J. (2012). Evaluating the impact of cash transfer programmes in sub-Saharan Africa: an introduction to the special issue. Journal of development Effectiveness, 4(1), 1-8.

Deaton, A., & Drèze, J. (2009), “Food and Nutrition in India: Facts and Interpretations”, Economic and Political Weekly”, 42-65.

Duflo, E. (2003). Grandmothers and granddaughters: old‐age pensions and intrahousehold allocation in South Africa. The World Bank Economic Review, 17(1), 1-25.

Emina, J.B., N.B. Kandala, J. Inugu, and Y. Ye. 2009. “The Effect of Maternal Education on Child Nutritional Status in the Democratic Republic of Congo.” Paper presented at the 26th International Population Conference of the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population (IUSSP), Marrakech, Morocco, September 27 to October 2.

Gaiha, R., Jha, R., & Kulkarni, V. S. (2010), ”Prices, Expenditure and Nutrition in India”,. Australia South Asia Research Centre, Australian National University, Working Paper, (2010/15).

Leroy, J. L., Ruel, M., & Verhofstadt, E. (2009). The impact of conditional cash transfer programmes on child nutrition: a review of evidence using a programme theory framework. Journal of development effectiveness, 1(2), 103-129.

Macours, K., Schady, N., & Vakis, R. (2012). Cash transfers, behavioral changes, and cognitive development in early childhood: evidence from a randomized experiment. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(2), 247-73.

Martins, A. P. B., Canella, D. S., Baraldi, L. G., & Monteiro, C. A. (2013). Cash transfer in Brazil and nutritional outcomes: a systematic review. Revista de Saúde Pública, 47(6), 1159–1171. http://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047004557

Miller, J.E., and Y.V. Rodgers. 2009. “Mothers’ Education and Children’s Nutritional Status: New Evidence from Cambodia.” Asian Development Review 26(1): 131-65.

Moore, C. (2008). Assessing Honduras? CCT Programme PRAF, Programa de Asignación Familiar: Expected and Unexpected Realities (No. 15). International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.

Mukuria, A., J. Cushing, and J. Sangha. 2005. Nutritional Status of Children: Results from the Demographic and Health Surveys 1994-2001. DHS Comparative Report No. 10. Calverton, MD, USA: ORC Macro

Qian, N. (2008). Missing women and the price of tea in China: The effect of sex-specific earnings on sex imbalance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(3), 1251-1285.

Quisumbing, A. R., & Maluccio, J. A. (2000). Intrahousehold allocation and gender relations: New empirical evidence from four developing countries. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

Ramalingaswami, V., Jonsson, U., & Rohde, J. (1997). Malnutrition: a South Asian enigma.

Sekher, T. V. (2012). Ladlis and Lakshmis: financial incentive schemes for the girl child. Economic and Political Weekly, 58-65.

Sekher, T. V., & Ram, F. (2015). Conditional Cash Transfers for Girls in India: Assessment of a Girl Child Promotion Scheme from Beneficiary Perspective. Report of a project study sponsored by UNFPA-India. Mumbai: IIPS (http://iipsindia. org/pdf/IipsReportCTGirlsinIndia. pdf).

Smith, L. C., & Haddad, L. J. (2000). Explaining child malnutrition in developing countries: A cross-country analysis (Vol. 111). Intl Food Policy Res Inst.

UNDP (2009) . “Conditional Cash Transfers Schemes for Alleviating Human Poverty: Relevance for India”.