Garcia, Arturo and Leal, Mariel and Lee, Sang-Ho (2020): Merger incentive and strategic CSR by a multiproduct corporation.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_98830.pdf Download (353kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study investigates an interplay between strategic CSR (corporate social responsibility) by a multiproduct corporation and merger decisions by rival firms each having single plant. We examine and compare two different timings of choosing CSR, i.e., ”merge-then-CSR” and ”CSR-then-merge” games. In the former case, we show that the level of CSR increases in products substitutability, but its level under merger is lower than that without merger. In the latter case where a multiproduct corporation can commit to a higher level of CSR before rival firms’ mergers, however, the level of CSR decreases in products substitutability and it might increase not only consumer surplus but social welfare.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Merger incentive and strategic CSR by a multiproduct corporation |
English Title: | Merger incentive and strategic CSR by a multiproduct corporation |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | multiproduct corporation; strategic CSR; timing of commitment; products substitutability; merger decision; |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior L - Industrial Organization > L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies |
Item ID: | 98830 |
Depositing User: | Professor Sang-Ho Lee |
Date Deposited: | 29 Feb 2020 14:20 |
Last Modified: | 29 Feb 2020 14:20 |
References: | Armstrong, M., Vickers, J., 2018. Multiproduct pricing made simple. Journal of Political Economy 126, 1444–1471. Baron, D., 2001. Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 10, 7–45.320 Benabou, R., Tirole, J., 2010. Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica 77, 1–19. Bereskin, F., Byun, S., Officer, M., Oh, J.M., 2018. The effect of cultural similarity on mergers and acquisitions: Evidence from corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 53, 1995–2039. Brand, B., Grothe, M., 2013. A note on ’corporate social responsibility and marketing channel coordination’, Research in Economics 67, 324–327. Crifo, P., Forget, V., 2015. The economics of corporate social responsibility: A firm-level perspective survey. Journal of Economic Surveys 29, 112–130. Deneckere, R., Davidson, C., 1985. Incentives to form coalitions with bertrand competition. The RAND Journal of Economics 16, 473–486.330. Deng, X., Kang, J.K., Low, B., 2013. Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers. Journal of Financial Economics 110, 87–109 Eckel, C., Neary, J., 2010. Multi-product firms and flexible manufacturing in the global economy. Review of Economic Studies 77, 188–217. Fanti, L., Buccella, D., 2016. Network externalities and corporate social responsibility. Economics Bulletin 36, 2043–2050. Fanti, L., Buccella, D., 2017. Corporate social responsibility, profits and welfare with managerial firms. International Review of Economics 64, 341–356. Farrell, J., Shapiro, C., 2010. Antitrust evaluation of horizontal mergers: An economic alternative to market definition. B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 10. Faul´ı-Oller, R., 2002. Mergers between asymmetric firms: Profitability and welfare. Manchester School 70, 77–87. Flammer, C., 2015. Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? a regression discontinuity approach. Management Science 61, 2549–2568. Garcia, A., Leal, M., Lee, S.H., 2018. Social responsibility in a bilateral monopoly with r & d. Economics Bulletin 38, 1467–1475. Garcia, A., Leal, M., Lee, S.H., 2020. Cooperation with a multiproduct corporation in a strategic managerial delegation. Managerial and Decision Economics 41, 3–9. Gelves, J., 2010. Horizontal merger with an inefficient leader. Manchester School 78, 379–394. Gelves, J., 2014. Differentiation and cost asymmetry: Solving the merger paradox. International Journal of the Economics of Business 21, 321–340. Goering, G.E., 2012. Corporate social responsibility and marketing channel coordination. Research in Eco nomics 66, 142 – 148. Heywood, J., McGinty, M., 2008. Leading and merging: Convex costs, stackelberg, and the merger paradox. Southern Economic Journal 74, 879–893. Hirose, K., Lee, S.H., Matsumura, T., 2017. Environmental corporate social responsibility: A note on the first-mover advantage under price competition. Economics Bulletin 37, 214–221. Hsu, J., Wang, X., 2010. Horizontal mergers in a differentiated cournot oligopoly. Bulletin of Economic Research 62, 305–314. Huck, S., Konrad, K., Mu¨ller, W., 2001. Big fish eat small fish: On merger in stackelberg markets. Economics Letters 73, 213–217. Jaffe, S., Weyl, E., 2013. The first-order approach to merger analysis. American Economic Journal: Microe conomics 5, 188–218. Kim, S.L., Lee, S.H., Matsumura, T., 2019. Corporate social responsibility and privatization policy in a mixed oligopoly. Journal of Economics 128, 67–89. Kitzmueller, M., Shimshack, J., 2012. Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economic Literature 50, 51–84. Kopel, M., Brand, B., 2012. Socially responsible firms and endogenous choice of strategic incentives. Economic Modelling 29, 982 – 989. KPMG, 2013. Survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2013. KPMG International KPMG, 2015. International survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2015. KPMG International Lambertini, L., Tampieri, A., 2015. Incentives, performance and desirability of socially responsible firms in a cournot oligopoly. Economic Modelling 50, 40 – 48. Leal, M., Garc´ıa, A., Lee, S.H., 2018. The timing of environmental tax policy with a consumer-friendly firm. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 59, 25–43.375 Lee, S.H., Park, C.H., 2019. Eco-firms and the sequential adoption of environmental corporate social respon sibility in the managerial delegation. B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 19. Liu, C.C., Wang, L., Lee, S.H., 2015. Strategic environmental corporate social responsibility in a differentiated duopoly market. Economics Letters 129, 108–111. Lommerud, K., Sørgard, L., 1997. Merger and product range rivalry. International Journal of Industrial Organization 16, 21–42 Moner-Colonques, R., Sempere-Monerris, J., Urbano, A., 2004. Strategic delegation with multiproduct firms. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 13, 405–427. Nie, P.y., 2018. Comparing horizontal mergers under cournot with bertrand competitions. Australian Economic Papers 57, 55–80.385 Nocke, V., Schutz, N., 2018. An aggregative games approach to merger analysis in multiproduct-firm oligopoly. NBER Working Paper No. 24578 . Nocke, V., Whinston, M., 2010. Dynamic merger review. Journal of Political Economy 118, 1201–1251. Nocke, V., Whinston, M., 2013. Merger policy with merger choice. American Economic Review 103, 1006–1033. Perry, M.K., Porter, R.H., 1985. Oligopoly and the incentive for horizontal merger. The American Economic Review 75, 219–227. Planer-Friedrich, L., Sahm, M., 2020. Strategic corporate social responsibility, imperfect competition, and market concentration. Journal of Economics 129, 79–101. PWC Global CEO survey, 2016. 19th annual global ceo survey. Salant, S.W., Switzer, S., Reynolds, R.J., 1983. Losses from horizontal merger: The effects of an exogenous change in industry structure on cournot-nash equilibrium. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 98, 185–199. Schreck, P., 2011. Reviewing the business case for corporate social responsibility: New evidence and analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 103, 167–188. Straume, O., 2006. Managerial delegation and merger incentives with asymmetric costs. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 162, 450–469. UN Global Compact-Accenture CEO Study, 2010. A new era of sustainability. UN Global Compact-Accenture CEO Study, 2013. Architects of a better world. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/98830 |