NEIFAR, MALIKA (2020): Employment-output elasticities determinants: case of cross-section from AMEE.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_98961.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Employment to production intensity is used as indicator for employment. The aim of this paper is to provide new estimates of employment-output elasticities and assess the effect of structural and macroeocnomic policies and demographic indicators on the employment-intensity of growth. Having a sample of 44 countries taken from AMEE (Africa and Middel East Erea; 20 francophone et 24 anglophone countries) over the priod 2000-2017, we propose linear and non linear specifications to assess the role of considered variables. Linear models results in majority do not confirm previous empirical results except that of Trade openness saying it contributes to explain cross-country variations in employment elasticities which tend to be higher in more open economies for Francophone countries. While for Anglophone countries, elasticities are effected only by 15 to 24 years old participant in active population (Tx1524). With non linear specifications (Quadratic, Cubic, and/or Augmented Cubic), Structural Policy variables (Labor market policy, Lmp, and Product market policy, Pmp) have increasing effect on elasticities. Structural reforms have to be complemented by macroeconomic stability policies (less GDP volatility) to maximize the effect of structural policies on employment responsiveness. In addition, macroeconomic policies aimed at promoting Foreign direct investment (FDI) have significant and positive impact on employment elasticities.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Employment-output elasticities determinants: case of cross-section from AMEE |
English Title: | Employment-output elasticities determinants: case of cross-section from AMEE |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Employment to product elasticity, Linear model, Cubic model, Quadratic model, Cross section, Africa and Middel East Erea (AMEE). |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E24 - Employment ; Unemployment ; Wages ; Intergenerational Income Distribution ; Aggregate Human Capital ; Aggregate Labor Productivity J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J21 - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure |
Item ID: | 98961 |
Depositing User: | Pr Malika NEIFAR |
Date Deposited: | 07 Mar 2020 01:11 |
Last Modified: | 07 Mar 2020 01:11 |
References: | Bassanini, A., & Duval, R. (2009). “Unemployment, Institutions, and Reform Complementarities: Re-assessing the Aggregate Evidence for OECD Countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(1), 40–59. Bernal-Verdugo, L., Furceri, D., & Guillaume, D. (2012a). Crises, Labor Market Policy, and Unemployment. IMF Working Papers 12/65 (Washington: International Monetary. Bernal-Verdugo, L., Furceri, D., & Guillaume, D. (2012b). Labor Market Flexibility and Unemployment: New Empirical Evidence of Static and Dynamics Effects. Comparative Economic Studies, 54(2), 251–273. Blanchard, O., & Wolfers, J. (2000). “The Role of Shocks and Institutions in the Rise of European Unemployment: The Aggregate Evidence. The Economic Journal, 110(462), 1–33. Bruno, M., & Sachs, J. (1985). The Economics of Worldwide Stagflation. Oxford: Blackwell. Bruno, S., & al. (2001). Measuring the effect of Globalization on Labour Demand Elasticity: An Empirical Application to OECD Countries. FLOWENLA Discussion paper 2. Crivelli, Furcer, .. D., & Touja, B. J. (2012). Can Policies Affect Employment Intensity of Growth? A Cross-Country Analysis. IMF Working Paper No. 12/2018. Fonds monétaire international, Washington, D.C. Döpke, J. (2001). The Employment Intensity of Growth in Europe. Kiel Institute of World Economics. Kiel Working paper n°. 1021. Elmeskov, J., & Pichelmann, K. (1993). Interpreting Unemployment: The Role of Labor Force Participation. OECD Economic Studies, 21, 139–160. Freeman, D. (2000). Panel tests of Okun’s law for Ten Industrial Countries. Economic Inquiry, 39(4), 511-523. Furceri, D. (2010). Long-Run Growth and Volatility: Which Source Really Matters ? Applied Economics, 42, 1865–1874. ILO. (2009). Global Employment Trends 2009. Geneva: ILO. Imbs, J. (2007). Growth and Volatility. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54, 1848–62. Judson, R., & Orphanides, A. (1999). Inflation, Volatility and Growth. International Finance, 2, 117–38. Kapsos, S. (2005). The employment intensity of growth: Trends and macroeconomic determinants. Employment Strategy Papers, ILO. La Porta, R., Silane, F. L., A. S., & Vishny, R. (1998). The Quality of Government. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 15(1), , 222–79. Loboguerrero, A., & Panizza, U. (2011). Inflation and Labor Market Flexibility: The Squeaky Wheel Gets the Grease. IDB Working paper(416). Mourre, G. (2004). Did the Pattern of Aggregate Employment Growth Change in the Euro Area in the Late 1990s? European Central Bank Working Paper Series (Brussels: European Central Bank)(358 ). Nickell, S. (1998). Why do Unemployment Rates Differ? Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter, 46, 219–224. Nickell, S., Nunziata, L., & Wolfgang, O. (2005). Unemployment in the OECD since the 1960s. What Do We Know? The Economic Journal, 115(500), 1–27. Nunziata, L. (2002). Unemployment, Labour Market Institutions and Shocks. Nuffield College Working Papers in Economics(16). Padalino, S., & Vivarelli, M. (1997). The Employment Intensity of Economic Growth in the G-7 Countries. International Labor Review, 136 (2). Ramey, G., & Ramey, V. A. (1995). Cross-Country Evidence on the Link-Between Volatility and Growth. American Economic Review, 85, 1138–51. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/98961 |