Multi-Dimensional Development – An Application of Fuzzy Set Theory to the Indian States

A., Rjumohan (2017): Multi-Dimensional Development – An Application of Fuzzy Set Theory to the Indian States.

Abstract

Even though India has recently become one of the fastest growing economies of the world and one among the most important G-20 economies, in terms of many development indicators, India has not fared well. Ours is a country of wide diversity in regional, social, economic, political, and cultural dimensions. Different States with different policy mixes have witnessed very different outcomes over the years. Some States have focused only on growth and some States have won laurels in achieving the objectives of both growth and development simultaneously. Analysis of this diversity and disparity across the States in their performance would help us identify useful policies of development.

However, many concepts/predicates, such as poverty (or poor) and its opposite, development (or developed), used in economics are both vague/fuzzy and multi-dimensional and their analysis requires careful consideration of a graded membership. This study therefore employs the framework of fuzzy set theory in identifying and analysing the positions of different states in the development ladder, that is, their graded memberships in each development dimension and in aggregation.

The development dimensions that we consider are health, knowledge and standard of living. Note that these dimensions are latent factors, that is, unobservable; hence we have to use some indicators to proxy these development dimensions. The indicators of health dimension are: (i) Life expectancy at birth, (ii) Infant mortality rate, (iii) Birth rate, and (iv) Death rate. As an indicator of knowledge we take literacy rate, and that of standard of living, per capita net state domestic product at constant prices prices. The selected states are: Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Gujarat, Haryana, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal. The data have been sourced from the Planning Commission of India

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Multidimensional development,Fuzzy set, Indian States, Health, Education, Standard of living
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I0 - General; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development

References

1) Baliamoune, Mina N. (2004) “On the Measurement of Human Well-Being: Fuzzy Set Theory and Sen’s Capability Approach”. WIDER Working Paper 16/2004 , UNU-WIDER February.

2) Baliamoune, Mina N. (2000). “Economics of Summitry: An Empirical Assessment of the Economic Effects of Summits”. Empirica 27: 295-314.

3) Bárdossy, A., and Duckstein, L. (1995). Fuzzy rule-based modeling with applications to geophysical, biological, and engineering systems. New York: CRC Press.

4) Basu K (1987) “Axioms for a fuzzy measure of inequality”. Mathematical Social Science 14:275-288.

5) Betti, G., Cheli B. and Cambini R. (2004), “A statistical model for the dynamics between two fuzzy states: theory and an application to poverty analysis”, Metron, 62, pp. 391-411.

6) Betti, G., Cheli, B., Lemmi, A. and Verma, V. (2005), “On the construction of fuzzy measures for the analysis of poverty and social exclusion”, paper presented to the International Conference to Honour Two Eminent Social Scientist: C. GINI and M.O. LORENZ, University of Siena, 23-26 May 2005.

7) Betti G., and Verma V. (1999) “Measuring the degree of poverty in a dynamic and comparative context: a multi-dimensional approach using fuzzy set theory”, Proceedings, ICCS-VI, Vol. 11, pp. 289-301, Lahore, Pakistan.

8) Betti G., and Verma V. (2002) “Non-monetary or Lifestyle Deprivation”, in Eurostat (2002) European Social Statistics: Income, Poverty and Social Exclusion: 2nd Report. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, pp. 76-92.

9) Betti, G. and Verma V. (2004), “A methodology for the study of multidimensional and longitudinal aspects of poverty and deprivation”, Working Paper 49, Università di Siena, Dipartimento di Metodi Quantitativi.

10) Blaszczak-Przybycinska I. (1992) Multidimensional statistical analysis of poverty in Poland, Poverty measurement for economies in transition. Polish Statistical Association and Central Statistical Office, Warsaw, pp. 307-327.

11) Cerioli A, and Zani, S (1990) “A fuzzy approach to the measurement of poverty”. In: Dagum C, and Zenga M (eds) Income and Wealth Distribution, Inequality and Poverty. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 272-284.

12) Cheli B. (1995) “Totally Fuzzy and Relative Measures in Dynamics Context”, Metron, 53 (3/4), pp. 83-205.

13) Cheli B, and Lemmi A (1995) “A ‘Totally’ Fuzzy and Relative Approach to the Multidimensional Analysis of Poverty”. Economic Notes 24:115-134.

14) Cheli B., and Betti G. (1999), “Fuzzy Analysis of Poverty Dynamics on an Italian Pseudo Panel, 1985-1994”, Metron, 57, 1-2, pp. 83-103.

15) Chiappero-Martinetti E (1994) “A new approach to the evaluation of well-being and poverty by fuzzy set theory”. Giornale Degli Economisti e Annali di Economia 53:367-388.

16) Chiappero-Martinetti E (1996) “Standard of living evaluation based on Sen's approach: some methodological considerations”. Notizie di Politeia 12:37-53.

17) Chiappero-Martinetti E (2000) “A multi-dimensional assessment of well-being based on Sen's functioning theory”. Rivista Intemazionale di Scienze Sociali 108:207-231.

18) Chiapperio-Martinetti E (2005) “Complexity and vagueness in the capability approach: strengths or weaknesses?” In: Comim F, Qizilbash M, Alkire S (eds) The capability approach: concepts, applications and measures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

19) Clark, D.A., and Qizilbash, M. (2002), “Core Poverty and Extreme Vulnerability in South Africa”, Presented to the IARIW Conference, Stockholm.

20) Cornelissen, A.M.G.; Van Den Berg, J.; Koops, W.J.; Grossman, M. and Udo, H.M.J. (2000) Assessment of Sustainable Development: A Novel Approach Using Fuzzy Set Theory. Erasmus Research Institute of Management Report Series -2000-23-LIS, April 2000.

21) Dagum C. and Costa M. (2004) “Analysis and Measurement of Poverty. Univariate and Multivariate Approaches and Their Policy Implications. A Case Study: Italy”; in Dagum C. and Ferrari G. (eds.), Household Behaviour, Equivalence Scales, Welfare and Poverty. Heidelberg, Physica-Verlag, pp. 221-272.

22) Dagum C., Gambassi R. and Lemmi A. (1992) New approaches to the measurement of poverty; Poverty measurement for economies in transition. Polish Statistical Association and Central Statistical Office, Warsaw, pp. 201-225.

23) Dreze, Jean and Sen, Amartya (1995) India’s Economic Development and Social Opportunity. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 78.

24) Dubois D, Prade H (1980) Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications. Academic Press, New York.

25) Easterly, William (2003). “The political economy of growth without development: A case study of Pakistan,” in Dani Rodrik (ed.) In Search of Prosperity: Analytic Narratives on Economic Growth, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press).

26) Filippone A., Cheli B., and D’Agostino A. (2001), “Addressing the Interpretation and the Aggregation Problems in Totally Fuzzy and Relative Poverty Measures”, ISER Working Papers, n. 2001-22, Institute for Social and Economic Research - University of Essex, Colchester, UK.

27) Goldstein, H., Rasbash, J., Browne, W., Woodhouse, G., & Poulain, M. (2000). Multilevel models in the study of dynamic household structures. European Journal of Population: Revue Europeenne de Demographie, 16, 373–387.

28) Keefe, R. and Smith, P. (1996) Vagueness: a reader. MIT press, Cambridge Mass.

29) Hesketh, B., Pryor, R. G., Gleitzman, M., and Hesketh, T. (1988). Practical applications and psychometric evaluation of a computerised fuzzy graphic rating scale. In T. Zetenyi (Ed.), Fuzzy sets in psychology: Advances in psychology (pp. 425–454). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

30) Klasen, S. (1997), “Poverty, inequality and deprivation in South Africa: an analysis of the 1993 ALDRU Survey”, Social Indicators Research 41, pp. 51-97.

31) Klasen, S. (2000), “Measuring poverty and deprivation in South Africa”, Review of Income and Wealth 46(1), pp. 33-58.

32) Kosko, Bart. (1990) “Fuzziness vs. Probability”. International Journal of General Systems, 17 (2-3), June: 211-240.

33) Lelli, Sara (2001) “Factor Analysis vs. Fuzzy Sets theory: Assessing the influence of Different Techniques on Sen's Functioning Approach”. Presented at the conference on ‘Justice and poverty: Examining Sen's Capability Approach’. St. Edmund's College, Cambridge, June. Also as Discussion Paper Series DPS 01.21, Center for Economic Studies, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium, November.

34) Lemmi, Achille, and Betti, Gianni (2006). “Introduction” in Lemmi, Achille, and Betti, Gianni (ed.) Fuzzy Set Approach to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. Springer Science+Business Media, New York.

35) Manton, K. G., Woodbury, M. A., & Tolley, D. H. (1994). Statistical applications using fuzzy sets. New York: Wiley.

36) Massaro, D. W., Weldon, M. S., and Kitzis, S. N. (1991). Integration of orthographic and semantic information in memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 277–287.

37) Mussard, S and Pi-Alperin, M.N. (2005), “Multidimensional Decomposition of Poverty: A Fuzzy Set Approach”, paper presented to the International Conference to Honour Two Eminent Social Scientist: C. GINI and M.O. LORENZ, University of Siena, 23-26 May 2005.

38) Nehru, Jawaharlal [1946] (1999) The Discovery of India. 19th Impression. Oxford University Press, New Delhi.

39) Oden, G. C., and Massaro, D. W. (1978). “Integration of featural information in speech perception”. Psychological Review, 85, 172–191.

40) Pannuzi N. and Quaranta A.G. (1995), “Measuring poverty: a study case in an Italian industrial city”, in Dagum C. and Lemmi A. (eds.) Income Distribution, Social Welfare, Inequality and Poverty, Volume 6 of Slottje D.J. (ed) Research on Economic Inequality, JAI Press Inc., London, pp. 323-336.

41) Parasuraman, R., Masalonis, A. J., and Hancock, P. A. (2000). Fuzzy signal detection theory: Basic postulates and formulas for analysing human and machine performance. Human Factors, 42, 636–659.

42) Ponsard, C, and Fustier, B (1986) Fuzzy Economics and Spatial Analysis. Collection de TIME - CNRS: 32, Librairie de I'Universite (diffuseur), Dijon.

43) Qizilbash M (2002) “A Note on the Measurement of Poverty and Vulnerability in the South African Context”. Journal of International Development 14:757-772.

44) Qizilbash M (2003) “Vague language and precise measurement: the case of poverty”. Journal of Economic Methodology 10:41-58.

45) Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

46) Ragin, C. C., and Pennings, P. (Eds.). (2005). Special issue on fuzzy sets and social research. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(4).

47) Russel, Bertrand (1923) “Vagueness”. The Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy, Vol. 1(2) (June): 84-92; also in Collected Papers, vol. 9, pp. 147--154.

48) Seitz, S. T. (1994). Apollo’s oracle: Strategizing for peace. Synthese, 100, 461–495.

49) Seitz, S. T., Hulin, C. L., and Hanisch, K. A. (2001). Simulating withdrawal behaviors in work organizations: An example of a virtual society. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 4, 33–66.

50) Sen AK (1973) On economic inequality. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

51) Sen AK (1981) Poverty and famines: an essay on entitlement and deprivation. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

52) Sen, Amartya (1985) Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

53) Sen AK (1989) “Economic methodology: heterogeneity and relevance”. Social Research 56:299-330.

54) Sen AK (1992) Inequality reexamined. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

55) Sen AK (1997) On Economic Inequality, with a substantial annexe by Foster JE. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

56) Sen AK (1999) Development as freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

57) Smithson, M. (1987). Fuzzy set analysis for behavioral and social sciences. New York: Springer-Verlag.

58) Smithson M. (1988); “Fuzzy Set Theory and the Social Sciences: The Scope for Applications”; Fuzzy Sets and Systems; Vol. 26; 1-21.

59) Smithson, Michael, and Oden, G. C. (1999). Fuzzy set theory and applications in psychology. In D. Dubois and H. Prade (Eds.), International handbook of fuzzy sets and possibility theory, Vol. 5: Applications (pp. 557–585). Amsterdam: Kluwer.

60) Smithson, Michael and Verkuilen, Jay. (2006) Fuzzy set theory: Applications in the social sciences. Sage Publications

61) Steenkamp, J. B. E., & Wedel, M. (1991). A clusterwise regression method for simultaneous fuzzy market structuring and benefit segmentation. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 385–396.

62) Todaro, Michael P. and Smith, Stephen C. (2015) Economic Development. Twelfth Edition. Pearson.

63) Wallsten, T. S., Budescu, D. V., Rappoport, A., Zwick, R., and Forsyth, B. (1986). Measuring the vague meanings of probability terms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 348–365.

64) Zadeh LA (1965) “Fuzzy sets”. Information and Control. Vol. 8:338-353.

65) Zadeh LA (1975) “Fuzzy logic and approximate reasoning”. Syntheses Vol. 30:407-440.

66) Zhenga, Buhong and Zheng, Charles (2015) “Fuzzy ranking of human development: A proposal”. Mathematical Social Sciences, Vol. 78: 39 – 47.

67) Zimmermann H-J. (1993) The German Fuzzy Boom. Les clubs CRIN, La Lettre Vol. 4: 3-4.

68) Zimmermann H-J. (2000) An application-oriented view of modelling uncertainty. European Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 122:190 – 199.

69) Zimmermann H-J. (2010) Fuzzy Set Theory Advanced Review Vol 2 May/June: 317-332.

70) Zwick, R., Budescu, D. V., and Wallsten, T. S. (1988). An empirical study of the integration of linguistic probabilities. In T. Zetenyi (Ed.), Fuzzy sets in psychology (pp. 91–126). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

71) UNDP (2000) Human Development Report 2000. Oxford: OUP.

72) Verma V., and Betti G. (2002) “Longitudinal measures of income poverty and life-style deprivation”, Working Paper 50, Università degli Studi di Padova, Dipartimento di Scienze di Statistiche.

73) Von Furstenberg, George M. and Joseph P. Daniels (1991). “Policy Undertakings by the Seven Summit Countries: Ascertaining the Degree of Compliance”. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 35: 267-308.