Kishi, Akio and Kono, Tatsuhito (2020): Transportation Improvement and Hollowing-out of Urban Commercial Center: Do They Harm Consumer Welfare?
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_99247.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Concentration or dispersion of retail stores is the result of market interactions. If it involves market failures, then the spatial location equilibrium of retail stores is not optimal in terms of social welfare. We investigate two important market failures involving retail store location: “monopolistic competition among retail stores” and “shopping externality caused by multipurpose shopping”. Retail store locations in market equilibrium and those in a social optimum are derived. Next, we show that the degree of hollowing-out of urban centers is not always excessive from the perspective of the social optimum. It is believed that hollowing-out of urban commercial centers harms social welfare. But on the contrary, if the accessibility of suburban areas from residential areas is lower than that of the urban center, we confirm that hollowing-out of urban commercial centers is desirable. In this case, promotion of retail stores’ location in urban center, such as subsidies to locate in the city center or restrictions on location in suburbs, decreases social welfare. Instead, promotion of stores’ location in the suburbs is preferred.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Transportation Improvement and Hollowing-out of Urban Commercial Center: Do They Harm Consumer Welfare? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | monopolistic competition, hollowing-out, suburbanization, shopping externality |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L11 - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure ; Size Distribution of Firms L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R3 - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location > R32 - Other Spatial Production and Pricing Analysis |
Item ID: | 99247 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Tatsuhito Kono |
Date Deposited: | 27 Mar 2020 07:57 |
Last Modified: | 27 Mar 2020 07:57 |
References: | Ago, T. (2008). Central agglomeration of monopolistically competitive firms. Journal of Economic Geography, 8, 811–823. Anderson, S. P.; de Palma, R.; Thisse J.-F. (1992). Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation. The MIT Press. Baldwin, R. E.; Forslid, R.; Martin, P.; Ottaviano, G.; Roert-Nicoud, F. (2003). Economic Geography and Public Policy. Princeton, N. J., Oxford. Beckmann, M. J. (1999). Lectures on Location Theory. Springer. Capozza, D. R.; van Order, R. (1978). A generalized model of spatial competition. American Economic Review, 68, 896-908. Christaller, W. (1933). Die Zentralen Orte in Suddeutschland. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena. (Japanese translation: Christaller’s Location and Development of Cities. Taimeido, Tokyo, 1969). de Palma, A.; Ginsburgh, V.; Papageorgiou, Y. Y.; Thisse, J.-F. (1985). The principle of minimum differentiation holds under sufficient heterogeneity. Econometrica, 53, 767–781. Dixit, A. K.; J. E. Stiglitz (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review, 67, 297-308. Eaton, B. C.; Lipsey, R. G. (1982). An economic theory of central places. The Economic Journal, 92, 56-72. Fujita, M.; Krugman, P.; Venables, A. J. (1999). The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. The MIT Press. Hanson, S. (1980). Spatial diversification and multipurpose travel: implication for choice theory. Geographical Analysis, 12, 245-257. Henkel, J.; Stahl, K.; Walz, U. (2000). Coalition building in a spatial economy. Journal of Urban Economics, 47, 136-163. Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in competition. The Economic Journal, 39, 41-57. Ingene, C. A.; Ghosh, A. (1990). Consumer and Producer Behavior in a Multipurpose Shopping Environment. Geographical Analysis, 22, 70–93. Kishi, A., Kono, T., & Nozoe, Y. (2015). Location of Retail Stores in City Center and Outskirts under Spatial Price Competition: Improvements in Radial and Ring Roads. Review of Regional Studies, 45(2), 173-194. Mulligan, G. F. (1985). Consumer demand and multi-purpose shopping behaviour. Geographical Analysis, 15, 76-81. Mulligan, G. F. (1987). Consumer travel behaviour: Extensions of a multipurpose shopping model. Geographical Analysis, 19, 364-375. O’Sullivan, A. (1993). Urban Economics. Richard, D. Irwin, Inc. Pigou, A. C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare, MacMillan, London. Popkowski Leszczyc, Peter T. L.; Sinha, A.; Timmermans, Harry J. P. (2000). Consumer store choice dynamics: an analysis of the competitive market structure for grocery stores. Journal of Retailing, 76, 323-345. Popkowski Leszczyc, Peter T. L.; Sinha, A.; Sahgal, A. (2004). The effect of multi-purpose shopping on pricing and location strategy for grocery stores. Journal of Retailing, 80, 85-99. Reynolds, J.; Cuthbertson, C. (2003). Retail Strategy: The View from the Bridge. Butterworth–Heinemann, Oxford. Sinha, A. (2000). Understanding supermarket competition using choice maps. Marketing Letters, 11, 21-35. Tabuchi, T. (2009). Self-organizing marketplaces. Journal of Urban Economics, 66, 179-185. Thomson, J. M. (1977). Great Cities and Their Traffic. Gollancz, Peregrine Edition, London. Uschev, P., Sloev, I. and J-F. Thisse (2015). Do We Go Shopping Downtown or in the Burbs? Why not both. Journal of Urban Economics, 85, 1-15. Wolinsky, A. (1983). Retail trade concentration due to consumers’ imperfect information. Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 275-282. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/99247 |