On Covid-19: new implications of job task requirements and spouse's occupational sorting

Lekfuangfu, Warn N. and Piyapromdee, Suphanit and Porapakkarm, Ponpoje and Wasi, Nada (2020): On Covid-19: new implications of job task requirements and spouse's occupational sorting.

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has disrupted working life in many ways, the negative consequences of which may be distributed unevenly under lockdown regulations. In this paper, we construct a new set of pandemic-related indices from the Occupational Information Network (O*NET) using factor analysis. The indices capture two key dimensions of job task requirements: (i) the extent to which jobs can be adaptable to work from home; and (ii) the degree of infection risk at workplace. The interaction of these two dimensions help identify which groups of workers are more vulnerable to income losses, and which groups of occupations pose more risk to public health. This information is crucial for both designing appropriate supporting programs and finding a strategy to reopen the economy while controlling the spread of the virus. In our application, we map the indices to the labor force survey of a developing country, Thailand, to analyze these new labor market risks. We document differences in job characteristics across income groups, at both individual and household levels. First, low income individuals tend to work in occupations that require less physical interaction (lower risk of infection) but are less adaptable to work from home (higher risk of income/job loss) than high income people. Second, the positive occupational sorting among low-income couples amplifies these differences at the household level. Consequently, low-income families tend to face a disproportionately larger risk of income/job loss from lockdown measures. In addition, the different exposure to infection and income risks between income groups can play an important role in shaping up the timing and optimal strategies to unlock the economy.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Covid-19; labor market; work-from-home; physical proximity; occupational sorting
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D10 - General; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E24 - Employment ; Unemployment ; Wages ; Intergenerational Income Distribution ; Aggregate Human Capital ; Aggregate Labor Productivity; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J12 - Marriage ; Marital Dissolution ; Family Structure ; Domestic Abuse; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J21 - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure

References

Adams-Prassl, A, Boneva, T., Golin, M., and Rauh, C. (2020) Inequality in the Impact of the Coronavirus Shock: Evidence from Real Time Surveys, mimeo

Alon, T. M., Doepke, M., Olmstead-Rumsey, J., and Tertilt, M. (2020). The Impact of COVID-19 on Gender Equality (No. w26947). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Autor, D.H. and Dorn, D. (2013). ‘The growth of low skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market’, American Economic Review, 5(100), 1553–97.

Blinder, A.S. (2009). How many US jobs might be offshorable? World Economics, 2(10), 41–78.

Chiappori, P. A. (2017). Matching with transfers: The economics of love and marriage. Princeton University Press.

Chiappori, P. A., Samphantharak, K., Schulhofer‐Wohl, S., and Townsend, R. M. (2014). Heterogeneity and risk sharing in village economies. Quantitative economics, 5(1), 1-27.

del Rio-Chanona, R. M., Mealy, P., Pichler, A., Lafond, F., & Farmer, D. (2020). Supply and demand shocks in the COVID-19 pandemic: An industry and occupation perspective. CEPR Covid Economics: Vetted and Real-Time Papers, 6.

Dingel, J. and Neiman, B. (2020), How many jobs can be done at home? CEPR Covid Economics: Vetted and Real-Time Papers,1.

Gentilini, U., Almenfi, M., Orton, I, and Dale, P. (2020). Social Protection and Jobs Responses to COVID-19: A Real-Time Review of Country Measures. Live Document. World Bank, Washington, DC

Glover, A., Heathcote, J., Krueger, and D., Rios, V. (2020), Health vs Wealth: On the distributional effects of controlling a pandemic, CEPR Covid Economics: Vetted and Real-Time Papers, 6, 22-64.

Gorsuch, R. L. (1988). Exploratory factor analysis. In Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 231-258). Springer, Boston, MA.

Heckman, J., Pinto, R., & Savelyev, P. (2013). Understanding the mechanisms through which an influential early childhood program boosted adult outcomes. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2052-86.

Hicks, M. J., Faulk, D., & Devaraj, S. (2020). Occupational Exposure to Social Distancing: A Preliminary Analysis using O* NET Data.

Lekfuangfu, N.W., Piyapromdee, S., Porapakkarm, P., Wasi, N. (2020). ‘Sectoral Lockdowns: Labor Supply Analysis in Thailand’, aBRIDGEd article, Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research.

Samphantharak, K., & Townsend, R. M. (2018). Risk and return in village economies. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 10(1), 1-40.