Chu, Angus C. (2008): Effects of Blocking Patents on R&D: A Quantitative DGE Analysis.
This is the latest version of this item.
Download (272kB) | Preview
What are the effects of blocking patents on R&D and consumption? This paper develops a quality-ladder growth model with overlapping intellectual property rights and capital accumulation to quantitatively evaluate the effects of blocking patents. The analysis focuses on two policy variables (a) patent breadth that determines the amount of profits created by an invention, and (b) the profit-sharing rule that determines the distribution of profits between current and former inventors along the quality ladder. The model is calibrated to aggregate data of the US economy. Under parameter values that match key features of the US economy and show equilibrium R&D underinvestment, I find that reducing the extent of blocking patents by changing the profit-sharing rule would lead to a significant increase in R&D, consumption and welfare. Also, the paper derives and quantifies a dynamic distortionary effect of patent policy on capital accumulation.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Institution:||University of Michigan|
|Original Title:||Effects of Blocking Patents on R&D: A Quantitative DGE Analysis|
|Keywords:||blocking patents; endogenous growth; patent breadth; R&D|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property Rights
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
|Depositing User:||Angus C. Chu|
|Date Deposited:||18. Sep 2008 09:58|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 09:10|
1. Acemoglu, Daron (2007) “Introduction to Modern Economic Growth” book manuscript.
2. Acemoglu, Daron; and Akcigit, Ufuk (2008) “State Dependent Intellectual Property Rights Policy” NBER Working Paper No. 12775.
3. Aghion, Phillippe; and Howitt, Peter (1992) “A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction” Econometrica, vol. 60, p. 323-351.
4. Arnold, Lutz G. (2006) “The Dynamics of the Jones R&D Growth Model” Review of Economic Dynamics, vol. 9, p. 143-152.
5. Basu, Susanto (1996) “Procyclical Productivity: Increasing Returns or Cyclical Utilization?” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 111, p. 719-751.
6. Basu, Susanto; and Fernald, John G. (1997) “Returns to Scale in U.S. Production: Estimates and Implications” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 105, p. 249-283.
7. Caballero, Ricardo J.; and Jaffe, Adam B. (2002) “How High Are the Giants’ Shoulders: An Empirical Assessment of Knowledge Spillovers and Creative Destruction in a Model of Economic Growth” in A. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg, eds., Patents, Citations and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy, p. 89-152.
8. Chu, Angus C. (2007) “Economic Growth and Patent Policy: Quantifying the Effects of Patent Length on R&D and Consumption” MPRA Working Paper No. 5476.
9. Comin, Diego (2004) “R&D: A Small Contribution to Productivity Growth” Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 9, p. 391-421.
10. Futagami, Koichi; and Iwaisako, Tatsuro (2007) “Dynamic Analysis of Patent Policy in an Endogenous Growth Model” Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 132, p. 306-334.
11. Gallini, Nancy T. (2002) “The Economics of Patents: Lessons from Recent U.S. Patent Reform” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 16, p. 131-154.
12. Gilbert, Richard; and Shapiro, Carl (1990) “Optimal Patent Length and Breadth” RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 21, p. 106-112.
13. Goh, Ai-Ting; and Olivier, Jacques (2002) “Optimal Patent Protection in a Two-Sector Economy” International Economic Review, vol. 43, p. 1191-1214.
14. Green, Jerry R.; and Scotchmer, Suzanne (1995) “On the Division of Profit in Sequential Innovation” RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 26, p. 20-33.
15. Grossman, Gene M.; and Helpman, Elhanan (1991) “Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth” Review of Economic Studies, vol. 58, p. 43-61.
16. Grossman, Gene M.; and Lai, Edwin L.-C. (2004) “International Protection of Intellectual Property” American Economic Review, vol. 94, p. 1635-1653.
17. Guvenen, Fatih (2006) “Reconciling Conflicting Evidence on the Elasticity of Intertemporal Substitution: A Macroeconomic Perspective” Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 53, p. 1451-1472.
18. Hall, Bronwyn H.; Jaffe, Adam B.; and Trajtenberg, Manuel (2002) “The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools” in A.B. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg, eds., Patents, Citations and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy, p. 403-459.
19. Hopenhayn, Hugo; Llobet, Gerard; and Mitchell, Matthew (2006) “Rewarding Sequential Innovators: Prizes, Patents, and Buyouts” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 114, p. 1041-1068.
20. Hunt, Robert M. (1999) “Nonobviousness and the Incentive to Innovate: An Economic Analysis of Intellectual Property Reform” Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Working Paper 99-3.
21. Jaffe, Adam B. (2000) “The U.S. Patent System in Transition: Policy Innovation and the Innovation Process” Research Policy, vol. 29, p. 531-557.
22. Jaffe, Adam B.; and Lerner, Josh (2004) “Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It” Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23. Jones, Charles I. (1995a) “Time Series Tests of Endogenous Growth Models” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 110, p. 495-525.
24. Jones, Charles I. (1995b) “R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 103, p. 759-784.
25. Jones, Charles I. (1999) “Growth: With or Without Scale Effects” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings vol. 89 p. 139-144.
26. Jones, Charles I.; and Williams, John C. (1998) “Measuring the Social Return to R&D” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 113, p. 1119-1135.
27. Jones, Charles I.; and Williams, John C. (2000) “Too Much of a Good Thing? The Economics of Investment in R&D” Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 5, p. 65-85.
28. Judd, Kenneth L. (1985) “On the Performance of Patents” Econometrica, vol. 53, p.567-586.
29. Klemperer, Paul (1990) “How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection Be? RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 21, p. 113-130.
30. Kwan, Yum K.; and Lai, Edwin L.-C. (2003) “Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Endogenous Economic Growth” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 27, p. 853-873.
31. Laitner, John (1982) “Monopoly and Long-Run Capital Accumulation” Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 13, p. 143-157.
32. Laitner, John; and Stolyarov, Dmitriy (2004) “Aggregate Returns to Scale and Embodied Technical Change: Theory and Measurement Using Stock Market Data” Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 51, p. 191-233.
33. Lanjouw, Jean Olson (1998) “Patent Protection in the Shadow of Infringement: Simulation Estimations of Patent Value” Review of Economic Studies, vol. 65, p. 671-710.
34. Li, Chol-Won (2001) “On the Policy Implications of Endogenous Technological Progress” Economic Journal, vol. 111, p. 164-179.
35. Nordhaus, William (1969) “Invention, Growth, and Welfare” Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
36. O’Donoghue, Ted (1998) “A Patentability Requirement for Sequential Innovation” RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 29, p. 654-679.
37. O’Donoghue, Ted; Scotchmer, Suzanne; and Thisse, Jacques-Francois (1998) “Patent Breadth, Patent Life, and the Pace of Technological Progress” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, vol. 7, p. 1-32.
38. O’Donoghue, Ted; and Zweimuller, Josef (2004) “Patents in a Model of Endogenous Growth” Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 9, p. 81-123.
39. Romer, Paul M. (1990) “Endogenous Technological Change” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 98, S71-S102.
40. Scotchmer, Suzanne (2004) “Innovation and Incentives” Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
41. Segerstrom, Paul S. (1998) “Endogenous Growth without Scale Effects” American Economic Review, vol. 88, p. 1290-1310.
42. Shapiro, Carl (2001) “Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting” in A. Jaffe, J. Lerner and S. Stern, eds., Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol. 1, p. 119-150.
43. Steger, Thomas M. (2005) “Non-Scale Models of R&D-based Growth: The Market Solution” Topics in Macroeconomics, vol. 5 (1), Article 3.
44. Tandon, Pankaj (1982) “Optimal Patents with Compulsory Licensing” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 90, p. 470-486.
45. Trimborn, Timo; Koch, Karl-Josef; and Steger, Thomas M. (2008) “Multi-Dimensional Transitional Dynamics: A Simple Numerical Procedure” Macroeconomic Dynamics, vol. 12, p. 301-319.
Available Versions of this Item
Optimal Patent Breadth: Quantifying the Effects of Increasing Patent Breadth. (deposited 09. Jul 2007)
A Generalized Quality-Ladder Growth Model with Patent Breadth: Quantifying the Effects of Blocking Patents on R&D. (deposited 06. Sep 2007)
A Generalized Quality-Ladder Growth Model with Overlapping Intellectual Property Rights: Quantifying the Effects of Blocking Patents on R&D. (deposited 01. Nov 2007)
- Effects of Blocking Patents on R&D: A Quantitative DGE Analysis. (deposited 18. Sep 2008 09:58) [Currently Displayed]
- A Generalized Quality-Ladder Growth Model with Overlapping Intellectual Property Rights: Quantifying the Effects of Blocking Patents on R&D. (deposited 01. Nov 2007)
- A Generalized Quality-Ladder Growth Model with Patent Breadth: Quantifying the Effects of Blocking Patents on R&D. (deposited 06. Sep 2007)