Shafaeddin, Mehdi (2008): The political Economy of WTO with special reference to NAMA Negotiations.
Download (225kB) | Preview
The dissatisfaction of developing countries with the new Trade Round surfaced first in the WTO meeting in Seattle in autumn 1999. The Round was finally launched in Doha in 2001. Nevertheless, since the, the negotiations has faced with difficulties and deadlocks. The author argues that such difficulties are rooted in the economic philosophy behind the design of GATT/WTO rules and in their implementation by developed countries. The interrelated issues of conflict of ideology/interests and imbalances in the power relationship between developing and developed countries are the main cause of the inherent bias in the world trading system against developing countries. Such bias prevailed right from the time of the inception of the Breton Woods System as an alternative to the Keynes’s proposal and the Havana charter. The combination of these factors has been reflected in a number of contradictions, double standards and asymmetries not only in GATT/WTO rules in favour of developed countries and their large corporations. It has also influenced the negotiation of developed countries with developing countries during the so-called “Doha Development Round” The author refers to the particular example of negotiation on NAMA, in some details, to highlight inconsistencies between the objectives/spirit of the agreed text of the Doha Round and subsequent proposals made by developed countries. If these proposals were to be agreed upon they would limit policy space of developing countries necessary for their industrialization. It may, in fact, lock many of them in production and exports of primary commodities and at best, resource-based and assembly operations. He further argues that unless these asymmetries are addressed, there will be a great risk of the collapse of the international trading system with its adverse socio-political consequences for the international community. Drawing on the experience of successful early and late industrializers and the failure of recent across-the-board and universal trade liberalization, he proposes the necessary changes in WTO rules commensurate with industrialization and development.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The political Economy of WTO with special reference to NAMA Negotiations|
|Keywords:||WTO, political economy, Non-agricultural market access, trade, trade policy, developing countries, industrial policy, trade negotiations|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O24 - Trade Policy; Factor Movement Policy; Foreign Exchange Policy
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q17 - Agriculture in International Trade
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General
F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F10 - General
L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L90 - General
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q10 - General
|Depositing User:||Mehdi Shafaeddin|
|Date Deposited:||07. Oct 2008 02:38|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 10:15|
Akyuz, Y. (2005), “The WTO negotiations and Industrial Tariffs: What is at Stake for Developing countries? (Third World Network, Geneva)
Amsden, A. H. (1989), Asia's Next Giant, South Korea and Late Industrialization (New York, Oxford University Press).
Gomery, R. E. and Baumol, W. J. (2000), Global Trade and Conflicting National Interests (Massachusetts, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
Bergsten, C. F. (2001), “ Fifty Years of Trade Policy: the Policy Lessons”, Journal of World Trade Law, 1- 13: p. 8 based on remarks by Treasury Secretary James A. Baker before a conference sponsored by the Institute fro International Economics (14 September 1987).
Barshefsky C.(2007) “Chrles Barshefsky, on Doha”, International Herald Tribune, Managing Globalization “Business Blog”, 31, January 2007.
Boillier S. and Weissman, R , “US gave huge industrial subsidies ,while now proposing WTO ban”, SUNS, 16 July 2007.
Bouet, A.,Mevel,S.and Orden,D.(2007), “”More or less Ambition in the Doha Round: Winners and Losers from Trade Liberalisation with a Development Perspective”, The World Economy:1253-80.
Chang, Ha-Joon (2005) Why Developing Countries Need Tariffs; How WTO NAMA Negotiation could Deny Developing Countries’ Right to Future, South Centre, Geneva.
Cline, R. W. (1983), Trade Policy and Economic Welfare (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
Corden, W. M. (1974), Trade Policy and Economic Welfare (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
Das, B.L. (2005), The Current Negotiations in WTO, Options, Opportunities and Risks for Developing Countries (Geneva, Zed Books and TWN):34 and 36.
Haberler G. (1950), “Some Problems in the Pure Theory of International Trade”, The Economic Journal, 60, 223–406.
Helleiner, G. K.(2005) "Markets, Politics and globalization: Can the Global Economy be Civilized?", 10th Raul Prebisch Lecture, Geneva, UNCTAD.
Ikenson, D(2004), " Zeroing IN: Antidumping's Flawed Methodology under Fire", Centre for Trade Policy Studies, Cato Institute, Trade Bulletin No. 11 Kaldor,N.( 1972): 1240); it was concerned with the expansion of international trade as against “productive power”( economic development).
Khor, M. and Yen, G.C. (2005), “The WTO Negotiation on Non-Agricultural Market Access: A Development Perspective” a paper presented to a Workshop on NAMA organized by TWN, Geneva,9 May 2005 :10-12 for details.
Kinman, S. and Lodefalk, M.(2007), “What is at stake in the Doha Round?”, The World Economy, 1305-25. List, F. (1856), The National System of Political Economy, translated by Matile, G. A. (Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott & Co.).
Mooney, P. R. (1999), “Concentration in Corporate Power on the Coming Binano Republic”, Development Dialogue, 1–2.,73-114
Reinert, F. S. (2000), The Other Cannon: The Other Cannon and the History of Economic Policy, Norsk Investor Forum and SVN (Oslo, University of Oslo, Centre for Development and Environment).
Samuelson, P. A. (1938), “Welfare Economies and International Trade”, American Economic Review, 261–66. Reprinted in Stiglitz, J. E. (1966), The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson (Cambridge, M.A., MIT Press).
Samuelson, P. A. (1939), “The gains from International Trade”, Canadian Journal of Economies and Political Science, V, 195–205. Reprinted in Stiglitz, op. cit.
Samuelson P.A. (2004), “Where Ricardo and Mill Rebut and Confirm Arguments of Mainstream Economists supporting Globalization”, Journal of Economic Perspective; 18, 3, Summer:135-46.
Shafaeddin (2005.a), Is Industrial Policy Relevant in the 21st Century (Kuwait, Arab Planning Institute reprinted by TWN): 9-14.
Shafaeddin, M (2005.b). “Towards an Alternative Perspective on Trade and Industrial Policies”, Development and Change, 36.6:1143-1162.
Shafaeddin, M.(2005.c), Trade Policy at the Crossroads; the Recent Experience of Developing Countries, Palgrave, Macmillan.
Shafaeddin (2006.a), “Beware of NAMA’s Slippery Slope to Industrialization”, SUNS, 15 June available at http://www2.unine.ch/webdav/site/irene/shared/documents/SUNS15- Shafaeddin.pdf
Shafaeddin (2006.b), “Does Trade Openness favour or Hinder Industrialization and development”, a paper presented to the technical group meeting of Intergovernmental Group of 24 on International monetary affairs, Geneva, United nations, 16-17 march 2006, available at www.g24.org/msha0306.pdf Singer, H. W. (1989), “Lessons of Post-War Development Experience: 1945-1988”, Discussion Paper, No. 260, Institute of development Studies, Sussex. South Centre (2007), Comments to the Chairman’s Draft NAMA Modalities, Analytical Note, SC/AN/TDP/MA/7 (Geneva, South Centre). South -North Development Monitor (SUNS), 16 August 2007.
Subast, T. (2003) “ What Does the Hechscher-Ohlin Model Contribute to International Trade Theory”? A Critical assessment”, Review of radical political Economics,35,2,148-65
UNCTAD (1985), Trade and development Report, 1984 (United Nations, New York).
UNCTAD (2007), World Investment Report, 2007 (United Nations, New York).
Viner, J. (1953), International Trade and Economic Development (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
Wade, R. (2005), “What Strategies Are Viable for Developing Countries Today? The World Trade Organization and Shrinking of Development Space” in Gallagher K.P(ed). (2005), Putting Development First, the importance of Policy Space in the WTO and IFIs, (London and New York, ZED Books): 80-101, particularly p.89.
R. Wade (2006),”How to Change the WTO and Global Policy on Trade and Investment: Gaining Acceptance of “Open Economy Industrial Policy” by Hoisting Neoliberalism on its Own Petard”; Note for Princeton conference on “Normative and Empirical Evaluation of global Governance”, Feb.16-18, Revised 4 March, p.8.
Wade, (2007), “Does trade liberalization promote economic prosperity”, in Haas,P. and Hirs, J. (2007), Controversies in Globalization, (Congressional Quarterly Press).
Williamson, J.(ed.) (1990) “ Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? (Washington, D.C., Institute of International economics), Chapters 1 and 9What WTO (1998) World Trade Report, 1998 ((Geneva, WTO)
WTO (2006), World Trade Report, 2006 (Geneva, WTO).