Owen, Ann L. (2008): Grades, gender, and encouragement: A regression discontinuity analysis.
Download (117Kb) | Preview
This study employs a regression discontinuity design in order to provide direct evidence on the effects of grades earned in economics principles classes on the decision to major in economics and finds a differential effect for male and female students. Specifically, for female students, receiving an “A” for a final grade in the first economics class is associated with a meaningful increase in the probability of majoring in economics, even after controlling for the numerical grade earned in the class. This suggests that, for female students, the feedback that is embedded in the course letter grade has an encouragement effect on their decision to study economics further. It finds no evidence of a similar effect for male students.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Grades, gender, and encouragement: A regression discontinuity analysis|
|Keywords:||economics majors; grades; gender; regression discontinuity|
|Subjects:||A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economics Education and Teaching of Economics > A22 - Undergraduate
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J24 - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
|Depositing User:||Ann L. Owen|
|Date Deposited:||16. Nov 2008 05:14|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 11:05|
Ballard, Charles and Marianne Johnson, 2005, “Gender, Expectations, and Grades in Introductory Economics at a US University,” Feminist Economics 11(1): 95-122.
Beyer, Sylvia and Kelly Langenfeld, 2000, “Gender Differences in the Recall of Performance Feedback,” ERIC working paper #ED444079.
Chizmar, John F., 2000, “A Discrete-Time Hazard Analysis of the Role of Gender in Persistence in the Economics Major,” Journal of Economic Education Spring: 107-118.
Dweck, Carol S., William Davidson, Sharon Nelson, and Bradley Enna, 1978, “Sex Differences in Learned Helplessness: II. The Contingencies of Evaluative Feedback in the Classroom and III. An experimental Analysis,” Developmental Psychology, 14(3): 268-276.
Dynan, Karen E. and Cecilia E. Rouse, 1997, “The Underrepresentation of Women in Economics: A Study of Undergraduate Economics Students,” Journal of Economic Education 28(4): 350-368.
Horvath, Jane, Barbara Q. Beaudin, and Sheila P. Wright, 1992, “Persisting in the Introductory Economics Course: An Exploration of Gender Differences,” Journal of Economic Education, Spring: 101-108.
Imbens, Guido W. and Thomas Lemieux, 2008, “Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice,” Journal of Econometrics 142: 615-635.
Jensen, Elizabeth J. and Ann L. Owen, 2001, “Pedagogy, Gender, and Interest in Economics,” Journal of Economic Education, Fall: 323-343.
Jensen, Elizabeth J. and Ann L. Owen, 2000, “Why are Women Such Reluctant Economists? Evidence from Liberal Arts Colleges,” American Economic Review 90(2): 466-470.
Nichols, Austin, 2007a, "Causal Inference with Observational Data," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 7(4), pages 507-541.
Nichols, Austin, 2007b. rd: Stata module for regression discontinuity estimation. http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s456888.html.
Nowell, Clifford and Richard M. Alston, 2007, “I Thought I got an A! Overconfidence Across the Economics Curriculum,” Journal of Economic Education, Spring: 131-142.
Rask, Kevin N. and Elizabeth M. Bailey, 2002, “Are Faculty Role Models: Evidence from Major Choice in an Undergraduate Institution,” Journal of Economic Education, 33(2): 99-124.
Steele, Claude, 1997, “A Threat in the Air: How Stereotypes Shape Intellectual Identity and Performance,” American Psychologist 52(6): 613-629.