Ye, Maoliang and Nikolov, Plamen and Casaburi, Lorenzo and Asher, Sam (2008): One Step at a Time: Do threshold patterns matter in public good provision?
This is the latest version of this item.
Download (1042Kb) | Preview
There is a substantial literature examining coordination in public goods games. We conducted an experiment to explore how varying patterns of thresholds affect the willingness of subjects to contribute to a public good. We had subjects play a multi-period game where each subject was allocated an initial point endowment, told a threshold for the group and had to choose how much to contribute to the common pot. Each period is identical, except for the possibility of having a different threshold, which is always stated before the players make their contributions. We found that while contributions are similar for the increasing and decreasing threshold group types when thresholds were low, a sizeable gap opens up around the average threshold size. We found that for nearly every threshold, it is more profitable to be in an increasing than in a decreasing threshold group type. Early cooperation seems to facilitate the achievement of harder-to-reach thresholds, which require considerable contributions from all members of the group. These findings are also very robust in the regression specifications. Our findings shed light on the role of past cooperative success and threshold patterns on subsequent willingness to cooperate.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||One Step at a Time: Do threshold patterns matter in public good provision?|
|Keywords:||Experimental economics; Public goods decision making|
|Subjects:||G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G14 - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies
D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C92 - Laboratory, Group Behavior
H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H41 - Public Goods
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
|Depositing User:||Plamen Nikolov|
|Date Deposited:||20. Dec 2008 08:17|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 20:33|
Bagnoli, M., Lipman, B., 1989. Provision of public goods: fully implementing the core through private contributions. Review of Economic Studies 56, 583–601.
Bagnoli, M., McKee, M., 1991. Voluntary contribution games: efficient private provision of public goods. Economic Inquiry 29, 351–366.
Bochet, O., Page, T., and Putterman, L. (2006). Communication and punishment in voluntary contribution experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60:11-26.
Carpenter, J. P. (2006). The demand for punishment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 62:522-542.
Croson, R.T.A. and M. B. Marks (1998), ‘Alternative Rebate Rules in the Provision of a Threshold Public Good: An Experimental Investigation’, Journal of Public Economics 67, 195–220.
Croson, R.T.A. and M. B. Marks (1999), ‘The Effect of Incomplete Information in a Threshold Public Goods Experiment’, Public Choice 99, 103–118.
Croson, R.T.A. and M. B. Marks (2000), ‘Step Returns in Threshold Public Goods: A Meta- and Experimental Analysis’, Experimental Economics 2, 239-259.
Egas, M. and Riedl, A. (2005). The economics of altruistic punishment and the demise of cooperation. Discussion Papers 05-065/1, Tinbergen Institute.
Fehr, E. and GÄachter, S. (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review, 90:980-994.
GÄachter, S. and Herrmann, B. (2006). The limits of self-governance in the presence of spite: Experimental evidence from urban and rural russia. Discussion paper no. 2006-13, CeDEx.
Goeree, J., C. Holt and S. Laury (2002). Private costs and public benefits: Unraveling the effects of altruism and noisy behavior. Journal of Public Economics 83(2): 257-278.
Holt, Charles, The Y2K Bibliography of Experimental Economics and Social Science http://www.people.virginia.edu/~cah2k/y2k.htm Ledyard, J. (1995). Public goods: A survey of experimental research. In J. H. Kagel and A.E. Roth (eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics, 111-194, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Masclet, D., Noussair, C., Tucker, S., and Villeval, M.-C. (2003). Monetary and non-monetary punishment in the voluntary contribution mechanism. American Economic Review, 93:366-380.
Olson, M. (1980). The logic of collective action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Ostrom, E., Walker, J. M., and Gardner, R. (1992). Covenants with and without a sword: Self governance is possible. American Political Science Review, 86:404-417.
Palfrey, T., Rosenthal, H., 1984. Participation and the provision of discrete public goods: a strategic analysis. Journal of Public Economics 24, 171–193.
Schulze, William (1995). “GREEN PRICING: Solutions to the Potential Free-Rider Problem.” Discussion Paper, Department of Economics, University of Colorado.
Available Versions of this Item
Do threshold patterns matter in public good provision? (deposited 09. Dec 2008 14:39)
- One Step at a Time: Do threshold patterns matter in public good provision? (deposited 20. Dec 2008 08:17) [Currently Displayed]