How far can developing country commitments go in an immediate post-2012 climate regime?

Zhang, ZhongXiang (2008): How far can developing country commitments go in an immediate post-2012 climate regime? Unpublished.

Abstract

To point out the direction and focus of future international climate negotiations, this paper discusses how far developing country commitments can go in an immediate post-2012 climate regime. The paper argues that developing country commitments are most unlikely to go beyond the defined polices and measures in this timeframe. On this basis, the paper suggests that, rather than attempting the unrealistic goal, international climate negotiations may instead need to initially frame the post-2012 developing country participation in terms of certain policies and policies that I envisioned a decade ago. This conclusion does not change, as Barack Obama becomes the U.S. President and the Democrats have regained control over both U.S. House of Representatives and Senate. However, it should be emphasized that his stance on climate issues and how ambitious U.S. commitments would be under his administration are going to be critical for developing countries to take bold steps themselves and to even agree to reflect those national commitments in a global deal.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Post-Kyoto climate negotiations; Policies and measures; Developing countries
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q48 - Government Policy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate; Natural Disasters; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy

References

Cundy, C. (2006), World Bank Raises Spending, Exceeds Target, on Renewables, Environmental Finance, Vol. 7, No. 10, September, p. 14.

Diringer, E. (2008), The U.S. Election and Prospects for a New Climate Agreement, Pew Center on Global Climate Change, October 22, Available at: http://www.boell.de/downloads/ecology/TCPG_Election_Series_08_E_Diringer_Prospects_for_a_new_climate_agreement.pdf.

EIA (2007), Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 2006, DOE/EIA-0573(2006), U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Washington, DC, November, Available at: http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ggrpt/pdf/0573(2006).pdf.

Global Environment Facility (2008a), Status Report on the Climate Change Funds October 2008 (Report from the Trustee), GEF/LDCF.SCCF.5/Inf.2, Washington, DC, November 7, Available at: http://www.thegef.org/uploadedFiles/Documents/LDCFSCCF_Council_Documents/LDCFSCCF5_November_2008/LDCF.SCCF.5.Inf.2%20Status%20Report%20on%20the%20Climate%20Change%20Funds.pdf.

Global Environment Facility (2008b), Work Program Submitted for GEF Council Approval, GEF/C.34/6, Washington, DC, October 14, Available at: http://www.thegef.org/uploadedFiles/Documents/Council_Documents__(PDF_DOC)/GEF_C34/C.34.6%20Work%20Program%20Cover%20Note(1).pdf.

IEA (2007), Energy Use in the New Millennium - Trends in IEA Countries, International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris.

Pew Center on Global Climate Change (2008), Summary of the Boxer Substitute Amendment to the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act, June 4, Available at: http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/L-WFullSummary.pdf.

Point Carbon (2008), Carbon 2008: Post-2012 Is Now, March 11.

Rose, A. and Z.X. Zhang (2004), Interregional Burden-Sharing of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in the United States, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 477-500.

Stern, N. (2007), Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Available at: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/independent_reviews/stern_review_economics_climate_change/sternreview_index.cfm.

The World Bank (2006), An Investment Framework for Clean Energy and Development: A Progress Report, Background Paper for the Development Committee Meeting on September 18, Washington DC.

UNFCCC (2007), Report on Analysis of Existing and Potential Investment and Financial Flows Relevant to the Development of an Effective and Appropriate International Response to the Climate Change, Dialogue Working Paper No. 8, Prepared for the Fourth Workshop under the Dialogue on Long-Term Cooperative Action to Address Climate Change by Enhancing Implementation of The Convention, August 27-29, Vienna, Available at: http://unfccc.int/files/cooperation_and_support/financial_mechanism/financial_mechanism_gef/application/pdf/dialogue_working_paper_8.pdf.

Zhang, Z.X. (2000), Can China Afford to Commit itself an Emissions Cap? An Economic and Political Analysis, Energy Economics, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 587-614.

Zhang, Z.X. (2008a), Asian Energy and Environmental Policy: Promoting Growth While Preserving the Environment, Energy Policy, Vol. 36, No. 10, pp. 3905-3924.

Zhang, Z.X. (2008b), Multilateral Trade Measures in a Post-2012 Climate Change Regime?: What Can Be Taken from the Montreal Protocol and International Negotiations on Climate and Trade?, Invited Presentation at the International Workshop on Post-2012 Climate and Trade Policies, Organized by the United Nations Environment Programme and the EU-Funded ADAM Project, Geneva, Switzerland, September 8-9.